Effects of probiotic or prebiotic supplemented milk formulas on fecal microbiota composition of infants.

Ultrastructure Laboratory, Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology (INTA),University of Chile, J.P. Alessandri 5540, Santiago, Chile.
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Impact Factor: 1.36). 01/2006; 15(3):368-76.
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The aim of the study was to evaluate whether supplementation of milk-formulas with prebiotic fructo-oligosaccharides or a probiotic, Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (La1), could modulate the composition of the fecal microbiota of formula-fed infants, compared to breastfed (BF) infants. Ninety infants close to 4 months of age were randomized into one of three groups to be blindly assigned to receive for 13 weeks: a) an infant formula (Control), b) the same formula with fructo-oligosaccharides (Prebio), or c) with La1 (Probio). At the end of this period, all infants received the control formula for 2 additional weeks. Twenty-six infants, breastfed throughout the study, were recruited to form group BF. Fecal samples were obtained upon enrolment and after 7 and 15 weeks. Bacterial populations were assessed with classical culture techniques and fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Seventy-six infants completed the study. On enrolment, higher counts of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus and lower counts of enterobacteria were observed in BF compared to the formula-fed infants; these differences tended to disappear at weeks 7 and 15. No major differences for Clostridium, Bacteroides or Enterococcus were observed between the groups or along the follow up. Probio increased fecal Lactobacillus counts (p<0.001); 88% of the infants in this group excreted live La1 in their stools at week 7 but only 17% at week 15. Increased Bifidobacterium counts were observed at week 7 in the 3 formula groups, similar to BF infants. These results confirm the presence of higher counts of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli in the microbiota of BF infants compared to formula-fed infants before dietary diversification, and that La1 survives in the infant digestive tract.

Download full-text


Available from: Guillermo Osvaldo Figueroa, Jul 02, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is little or no information available on the impact of funding by the food industry on trial outcomes and methodological quality of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics research in infants. The objective of this study was to compare the methodological quality, outcomes of food industry sponsored trials versus non industry sponsored trials, with regards to supplementation of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics in infant formula. A comprehensive search was conducted to identify published and unpublished randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Cochrane methodology was used to assess the risk of bias of included RCTs in the following domains: 1) sequence generation; 2) allocation concealment; 3) blinding; 4) incomplete outcome data; 5) selective outcome reporting; and 6) other bias. Clinical outcomes and authors' conclusions were reported in frequencies and percentages. The association between source of funding, risk of bias, clinical outcomes and conclusions were assessed using Pearson's Chi-square test and the Fisher's exact test. A p-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. Sixty seven completed and 3 on-going RCTs were included. Forty (59.7%) were funded by food industry, 11 (16.4%) by non-industry entities and 16 (23.9%) did not specify source of funding. Several risk of bias domains, especially sequence generation, allocation concealment and blinding, were not adequately reported. There was no significant association between the source of funding and sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and selective reporting, majority of reported clinical outcomes or authors' conclusions. On the other hand, source of funding was significantly associated with the domains of incomplete outcome data, free of other bias domains as well as reported antibiotic use and conclusions on weight gain. In RCTs on infants fed infant formula containing probiotics, prebiotics or synbiotics, the source of funding did not influence the majority of outcomes in favour of the sponsors' products. More non-industry funded research is needed to further assess the impact of funding on methodological quality, reported clinical outcomes and authors' conclusions.
    BMC Medical Research Methodology 11/2013; 13(1):137. DOI:10.1186/1471-2288-13-137 · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The bifidogenic effect of inulin and oligofructose is now well established in various studies, not only in adult participants but also in other age groups. This bifidogenic shift in the composition of the colonic microbiota is likely the basis for the impact of these prebiotic compounds on various parameters of colonic function. Mainly from animal and in vitro studies and also from some human trials, there are indications, for instance, that inulin-type fructans may reduce the production of potentially toxic metabolites and may induce important immune-mediated effects. This review discusses how these changes in the composition and activity of the colonic microbiota may affect gut health in healthy people, including in those who may experience some form of gastrointestinal discomfort.
    European journal of clinical nutrition 09/2009; 63(11):1277-89. DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2009.64 · 2.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the use of prebiotics (oligosac- charides) in child health, their applications and possible mechanisms of action. Data source: The articles for this review were electroni- cally selected from the Biblioteca Regional de Medicina (Bireme) virtual library database, which includes Lilacs, Medline and SciELO databases. Search included articles on the subject from 1998 to 2008 comprising children up to 12 years old. Data synthesis: The prebiotic oligosaccharides in food products provided beneficial effects that included increase in total number of bifidobacteria, reduction in the number of pathogenic intestinal microorganisms; improvement of excrement consistency and in the frequency of evacuations These effects suggest their recommendation for constipated children. Beneficial results were verified in several studies concerning the reduction of allergies development, res- piratory infections, fever, irritability, flatulence, diarrhea, regurgitation, vomits, colic, cry and use of antibiotics, with improvement of fermentation characteristics of fatty acids and fecal pH. Nevertheless, the number of studies found indicates the need for further investigation. Studies on cal- cium absorption were contradictory. Concerning tolerance, it is impossible to verify the safety of these products due to the use of diverse quantities of supplement for children from different age ranges and clinical characteristics Conclusions: Although prebiotics seem promising and provide beneficial effects in certain situations, they deserve further investigation to evaluate their actual ef-