Pyrolytic carbon proximal interphalangeal joint resurfacing arthroplasty

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
The Journal Of Hand Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.66). 07/2006; 31(6):930-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.02.018
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the clinical results of a pyrolytic carbon resurfacing proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis.
A retrospective review of 18 PIPJ arthroplasties in 8 women with severe osteoarthritis performed by a single surgeon was completed with an average follow-up period of 13 months. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), stability, and deformity. Radiographs were reviewed for evidence of loosening, subsidence, fracture, and osseointegration. Six patients, representing 16 joints, answered a questionnaire regarding pain relief, appearance, and overall satisfaction with the arthroplasty. Complications also were recorded.
The average preoperative ROM was 10 degrees to 63 degrees, and the average postoperative ROM was 18 degrees to 71 degrees. Although the average arc of motion was unchanged, 9 joints had an increase in ROM and 9 joints had a decrease in ROM. All joints were stable laterally. Radiographic review indicated 2 joints with loosening at 4 months after surgery. Complications included 8 squeaky joints, 5 joint contractures, and 2 dislocations. Pain was relieved completely in 8 joints, and the pain rating on a visual analog scale was 3.6 out of 10 for the 8 patients who had residual pain. Patients were satisfied completely with the results of 9 joints. Although there was residual deformity in 4 joints, patients believed that 15 of 16 joints had improved in appearance. Five of 6 patients responded that they would have the surgery again. There have been no secondary procedures performed by us.
The insertion of pyrolytic carbon implants for PIPJ arthroplasty is a technically demanding procedure, but it has the potential to achieve pain relief, stability, satisfactory ROM, and correction of the deformity; however, the results in this review were unpredictable and may not be superior to those achieved with other methods of arthroplasty.
Therapeutic, Level IV.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Ascension PyroCarbon proximal interphalangeal (PIP) total joint is used in osteoarthritis of the PIP finger joint. No systematic study of the positioning of this prosthesis and its relation to proximal and middle phalanx morphology has yet been reported. Positioning of the proximal and distal components of the Ascension PyroCarbon PIP total joint was radiographically analysed in 152 human cadaver fingers. Ideal implant position in the axis of the phalanx and with contact of the implant head with bone in both the frontal and sagittal planes was seen in only 33 % of the phalanges. Implant malposition was observed in the remaining 67 % of phalanges. The current design of the Ascension PyroCarbon PIP total joint can lead to malpositioning that we attribute to its incomplete accommodation of the morphology of the proximal and middle phalanx, the surgical challenges the design poses, or both acting together.
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 12/2014; 135(2). DOI:10.1007/s00402-014-2133-2 · 1.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the long-term results of proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint surface replacement arthroplasty for arthritis using the SR PIP implant (Small Bone Innovations, New York, NY). This is a long-term retrospective analysis of results in 39 of 43 joints first reported in 2008. Subjective results were based upon a mailed questionnaire. Active range of motion was measured by a certified hand therapist, and x-rays were obtained to analyze changes occurring since the first study. The average follow-up time was 9.3 years. The average active PIP joint arc of motion in the present cohort of patients went from 64° at the first report (2008) to 56° at this time. Radiographic comparisons revealed no major changes since the first study. Ten of 11 revisions were done for pain due to loosening and were performed at an average of 20 months after the primary procedure. No further revisions were necessary in the interim. Overall, subjective measures of satisfaction and symptomatic and functional improvement remained unchanged. Surface replacement arthroplasty using the SR PIP implant continues to be an option for patients with osteoarthritis of the PIP joint. Long-term subjective and objective outcomes are comparable to those reported using other implants. This and other studies suggest that this procedure is not appropriate for most rheumatoid joints. In the interim between studies, we saw a reduction in the average PIP joint arc of motion, although this change did not reach statistical significance. Our original revision incidence of 26% has not changed. Subjective evaluation and radiologic findings did not change between studies. Therapeutic IV. Copyright © 2015 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    The Journal Of Hand Surgery 01/2015; 40(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.015 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Intra-articular fractures or fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint are difficult clinically because the bone and soft tissue structures are small and intricate. Suboptimal treatment of intra-articular fractures typically leads to functional impairment of the hand. This article reviews the current methods of treatment, together with the senior author's experience in treating difficult proximal interphalangeal joint fractures and dislocations. Besides conservative treatments, surgical treatments include open or closed reduction with traditional Osteosynthesis, such as K-wires, screws or plates. Among recent developments are the percutaneous application of thin cannulated compression screws and novel dynamic external fixators. After a preferred minimally invasive treatment with stable reconstruction of the articular surface, sufficient aftercare is necessary to improve surgical outcomes. © The Author(s) 2014.
    Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 11/2014; 40(1). DOI:10.1177/1753193414559464 · 2.19 Impact Factor