Lack of improvement of clinical outcomes by a low-cost, hospital-based heart failure management programme

Cardiology Unit, Cardiopulmonary Science Department, S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Udine, Italy.
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Impact Factor: 1.51). 08/2006; 7(8):614-22. DOI: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000237910.34000.58
Source: PubMed


Heart failure (HF) is a major health problem resulting in a high financial burden for the healthcare system. Many previous HF management programmes reduced adverse clinical outcomes and costs, but they usually involved several professional figures as well as huge investments, requiring resources and budgets not often available in our healthcare system. We evaluated the effects of our HF management programme, which included patient education and regular outpatient contact with the HF team, on re-hospitalisation and death, optimising the few resources already available at our hospital.
Two hundred consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department with a diagnosis of HF were randomised to the intervention group (nurse-led education programme, facilitated telephone communication and follow-up visits with an internist at 15 days, 1 and 6 months) or to the usual care group (follow-up by their primary care physician). The primary endpoints were all-cause readmissions and all-cause deaths during the 6-month post-discharge period.
There were 81 all-cause hospital readmissions in the intervention group and 82 in the control group (P = NS). Fourteen patients (14%) in the intervention group and eight patients (8%) in the control group died during the study period (P = NS). Unplanned outpatient visits were less frequent in the intervention group than in the control group (39 [28%] versus 99 [72%], P < 0.001).
The present low-cost HF management programme reduced unplanned outpatient visits but proved ineffective in reducing subsequent readmissions and in improving clinical status. More intense follow-up monitoring and more resources are needed to achieve better results.

Download full-text


Available from: Gaetano Nucifora, Jul 12, 2014
  • Source
    • "Y D Y Y Y N N Y Y DeWalt et al., 2006 [9] Y Y Y Y N N N Y Y Dunagan et al., 2005 [15] Y Y Y Y Y N N Y Y Giordano et al., 2009 [16] Y Y Y Y D N N Y Y Jaarsma et al., 1999 [17] Y D N Y D N N Y D Jaarsma et al., 2000 [18] Y D Y Y D N N Y N Krumholz et al., 2002 [19] Y D Y Y Y N N Y Y Må rtensson et al., 2005 [20] Y D N Y D N N N Y Nuciforca et al., 2006 [21] Y D N Y N N N Y N Ramachandran et al., 2007 [6] Y Y Y Y D N N Y D Riegel et al., 2002 [22] Y D Y Y D N N Y D Shively et al., 2005 [23] Y Y Y Y D N N Y Y Tsuyuki et al., 2004 [24] Y Y N Y D N N Y Y Varma et al., 1999 [25] Y Y N Y D N N Y D Wakefield et al., 2008 [26] Y Y N Y D N N Y Y Y = yes, N = no, D = don't know. (1) Was a method of randomization performed? "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review examined the effectiveness of self-management interventions compared to usual care on mortality, all-cause hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched between 1996 and 2009. Randomized controlled trials were selected evaluating self-management interventions designed for patients with chronic heart failure. Outcomes of interest are mortality, all-cause hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life. Nineteen randomized controlled trials were identified. The effectiveness of heart failure management programs initiating self-management interventions in patients with chronic heart failure indicate a positive effect, although not always significant, on reduction of numbers of all-cause hospital readmitted patients and due to chronic heart failure, decrease in mortality and increasing quality of life. This systematic review found that current available published studies show methodological shortcomings impairing validation of the effectiveness of self-management interventions on mortality, all-cause hospital readmissions, chronic heart failure hospitalization rate and quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure. Further research should determine independent effects of self-management interventions and different combinations of interventions on clinical and patient reported outcomes.
    Patient Education and Counseling 03/2010; 78(3):297-315. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2010.01.016 · 2.20 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A range of behavioural, educational and provider-focused strategies have been tested, individually or in combination, for improving medication adherence. The results of various interventions in different patient groups, including the elderly, have been subjected to systematic reviews and meta-analyses, but because most studies have focused on improving adherence to one drug or drug group, they may have limited applicability to the general elderly population who more commonly use multiple medications for multiple co-morbidities.A systematic review of controlled studies aimed at improving adherence in community-living elderly patients prescribed at least three, or a mean/median of four or more, long-term medications was undertaken. Only studies which included a minimum of 60 patients in each group, followed patients for >or=4 weeks after intervention, and measured adherence to all medications at baseline and at the conclusion of the study were considered for inclusion in the review. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria. All eight studies used verbal and/or written medication information in combination with behavioural strategies with or without provider-focused strategies. Pharmaceutical care was the theoretical framework of the interventions used in the majority of the studies. Only four studies demonstrated a significant improvement in adherence as a result of the interventions. The relative change in adherence in the intervention groups was highly variable, ranging from -13% to +55.5% (mean +11.4%). Regular scheduled patient follow-up along with a multi-compartment dose administration aid was an effective strategy for maintaining adherence in one study, while group education combined with individualized medication cards was successful in another study. Medication review by pharmacists with a focus on regimen simplification was found to be effective in two studies.Overall, as a result of inconsistent methodology and findings across the eight studies, we were unable to draw firm conclusions in favour of any particular intervention. Innovative strategies for enhancing medication adherence in the elderly and reliable measures of adherence are needed. Until further evidence from single-intervention strategies becomes available, combinations of educational and behavioural strategies should be used to improve medication adherence in the elderly.
    Drugs & Aging 01/2008; 25(4):307-24. DOI:10.2165/00002512-200825040-00004 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Heart failure (HF) disease management programs have been tested, frequently via randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and reported in the literature. One of the interventions often included in disease management programs is self-care. Quality of life (QOL) is an individual outcome that may benefit from self-care interventions. Thus, the purposes of this review article are to (1) identify and critique research designed to test self-care interventions to improve QOL in HF patients, (2) identify gaps in the literature, and (3) provide recommendations for future research. A literature search was conducted for the time period of 1995 to 2007. The search terms were HF and QOL with self-care and self-management. Twenty-one articles that included HF self-care, self-management, or self-monitoring as an intervention with QOL as an outcome were identified. Seventeen of the studies were RCTs, and 4 of the studies used longitudinal, pre/post or repeated measures designs. Of the 17 RCTs, 9 studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL in the intervention group as compared with the usual care group. Regarding the studies that used repeated measures designs, all 4 of the studies demonstrated greater improvement in QOL from baseline to follow-up. Findings from RCTs of self-care, as an intervention, on HF patient QOL do not allow one to draw strong conclusions about the benefits of this intervention on QOL outcomes. Several factors may have contributed to these equivocal findings (including methodological and conceptual issues). The future study of self-care and its effect on QOL outcomes in HF patients will benefit from multisite, large sample-size RCTs with self-care as the primary intervention, careful definition of terms, and use of conceptual frameworks. Thus, self-care strategies to improve HF patient QOL need to be further tested, and the most efficacious strategies can subsequently provide the basis for changing clinical practice and improving patients' lives.
    The Journal of cardiovascular nursing 05/2008; 23(3):285-92. DOI:10.1097/ · 2.05 Impact Factor
Show more