Impact of acute chest syndrome on lung function of children with sickle cell disease

Departments of Child Health, Health and Life Sciences, and Haematological Medicine, King's College London School of Medicine at Guy's, King's College, and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, United Kingdom.
Journal of Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 3.74). 08/2006; 149(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.12.059
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To test the hypothesis that children with sickle cell disease (SCD) who experienced an acute chest syndrome (ACS) hospitalization episode would have worse lung function than children with SCD without ACS episodes.
Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)); forced vital capacity (FVC); FEV(1)/FVC ratio; peak expiratory flow (PEF); forced expiratory flow at 25% (FEF(25)), 50% (FEF(50)), and 75% (FEF(75)) of FVC; airway resistance (Raw); and lung volumes were compared in 20 children with ACS and 20 aged-matched children without ACS (median age, 11 years; range, 6 to 16 years). Fourteen age-matched pairs were assessed before and after bronchodilator use.
The mean Raw (P = .03), TLC (P = .01), and RV (P = .003) were significantly higher in the group with ACS than in the group without ACS. There were no significant differences in the changes in lung function test results in response to bronchodilator administration between the 2 groups, but the children with ACS had a lower FEF(25) (P = .04) and FEF(75) (P = .03) pre-bronchodilator use and a lower mean FEV(1)/FVC ratio (P = .03) and FEF(75) (P = .03) post-bronchodilator use.
Children with SCD who experienced an ACS hospitalization episode had significant differences in lung function compared with those who did not experience ACS episodes. Our results are compatible with the hypothesis that ACS episodes predispose children to increased airway obstruction.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although some of the most severe complications of Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) tend to be acute and severe (e.g. acute chest syndrome, stroke etc.), the chronic ones can be equally debilitating. Prominent among them is the effect that the disease has on lung growth and function. For many years the traditional teaching has been that SCD is associated with the development of a restrictive lung defect. However, there is increasing evidence that this is not a universal finding and that at least during childhood and adolescence, the majority of the patients have a normal or obstructive pattern of lung function. The following article reviews the current knowledge on the effects of SCD on lung growth and function. Special emphasis is given to the controversies among the published articles in the literature and discusses possible causes for these discrepancies.
    Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 10/2013; 15(1). DOI:10.1016/j.prrv.2013.10.002 · 2.22 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The pulmonary complications of sickle cell disease (SCD) are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality (MacLean et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 178:1055–1059, 2008; Klings et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:1264–1269, 2006; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 2009). Despite this recognition, predictive markers of lung dysfunction progression remain elusive (Klings et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:1264–1269, 2006; Platt et al. N Engl J Med 330:1639–1644, 1994; Caboot et al. Curr Opin Pediatr 20:279–287, 2008; Field et al. Am J Hematol 83:574–576, 2008; Shirlo et al. Peadiatr Respir Review 12:78–82, 2011). This study was designed describe the longitudinal progression and identify specific markers that influence bronchial disease in SCD. Methods A retrospective, chart review of 89 patients with SCD was conducted. All patients underwent spirometry in conjunction with body plethysmography as part of routine care. Eleven lung function variables were assessed, five of which were selected to establish patterns of normal, obstructive, restrictive, or mixed obstructive-restrictive physiology (Klings et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:1264–1269, 2006; Field et al. Am J Hematol 83:574–576, 2008). Results In the unadjusted model, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)% of predicted trended downward with age, while total lung capacity (TLC)% of predicted showed a bimodal distribution and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity corrected for hemoglobin (DLCOcor)% of predicted remained stable. Adjusting for acute chest syndrome (ACS) episodes, medication status, and growth velocity (GV), the final model demonstrated that the downward trend between FEV1% of predicted with age was further influenced by the latter two factors. Conclusions Initial decline in FEV1% of predicted is associated with worsening pulmonary dysfunction over time. Independent of ACS episodes, the factors most influential on the progression of FEV1% predicted include the introduction of medications as well as the promotion of adequate prepubertal growth. Efforts to ensure normal prepubertal GV and treatment with bronchodilators, such as short-acting beta2 agonists and inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), should be considered at an early age to delay progression of pulmonary dysfunction.
    Beiträge zur Klinik der Tuberkulose 06/2014; 192(3). DOI:10.1007/s00408-014-9572-y · 2.17 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hypoxemia is common in SCD and likely exacerbates SCD vasculopathy. Pulse oximeter correlation with arterial oxygen tension in patients with SCD may at times be poor and arterial blood gas confirmation is required in hypoxic patients. Supplemental oxygen should be administered for the correction of hypoxemia, which if untreated creates a risk of multi-organ failure. Transfusion and hydroxyurea can improve oxygen delivery to tissues and organs. The role of supplemental oxygen therapy in preventing or reversing SCD vasculopathy is controversial. Nitric oxide therapy for VOC pain has not fulfilled promise to date. On the other hand, lung distension (CPAP, incentive spirometry, PEP therapy) are promising treatments requiring further study.
    Paediatric Respiratory Reviews 12/2013; 15(1). DOI:10.1016/j.prrv.2013.12.004 · 2.22 Impact Factor