Differential activation of nerve fibers with magnetic stimulation in humans

Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
BMC Neuroscience (Impact Factor: 2.67). 02/2006; 7(1):58. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-58
Source: PubMed


Earlier observations in our lab had indicated that large, time-varying magnetic fields could elicit action potentials that travel in only one direction in at least some of the myelinated axons in peripheral nerves. The objective of this study was to collect quantitative evidence for magnetically induced unidirectional action potentials in peripheral nerves of human subjects. A magnetic coil was maneuvered to a location on the upper arm where physical effects consistent with the creation of unidirectional action potentials were observed. Electromyographic (EMG) and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings were then made from a total of 20 subjects during stimulation with the magnetic coil.
The relative amplitudes of the EMG and SEP signals changed oppositely when the current direction in the magnetic coil was reversed. This effect was consistent with current direction in the coil relative to the arm for all subjects.
A differential evocation of motor and sensory fibers was demonstrated and indicates that it may be possible to induce unidirectional action potentials in myelinated peripheral nerve fibers with magnetic stimulation.


Available from: Kenneth W. Horch
  • Source
    • "Thus, care should be taken at the onset of future rPMS studies for testing the combination of coil orientation and current direction that will best respond to the objectives of the intervention. Researchers should be aware of the fact that different combinations may be required to induce either stronger muscle contractions [68] or better-tolerated sensations when stimulating injured musculoskeletal structures [55] [75]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS over spinal root, nerve or muscle belly) is a promising technology in physiopathology research. As compared to electrical stimulation, rPMS is deemed to activate deep conductive structures and produce strong muscle contractions and massive proprioceptive afferents with minimal cutaneous recruitment. RPMS may thus act differently on neural plasticity involved in pain reduction and motor recovery in musculoskeletal or neurological conditions. However, literature is very scant and still controversial concerning afferents recruited by rPMS, thus no consensus is reached yet for its clinical use. Study aim: This review dealt with stimulation parameters reported in any scientific research that applied rPMS as an intervention to improve somatosensory or motor disorders with a view of proposing recommendations for future applications. Also, controversy on afferents recruitment was discussed. Results: The literature search resulted in 24 studies. Literature is scant on the topic but our review presents the rationale and the experimental data that may underlie the selection of parameters in future studies using rPMS as an intervention. Although controversy remains, the review presents that the specific recruitment of sensory afferents by magnetic stimulation may offer advantages and disadvantages depending on the pathology. Conclusions: The review proposed recommendations to improve rPMS application in clinical research. However, the development of guidelines still requires methodological and clinical studies enrolling larger samples and with randomized sham-controlled designs.
    Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology 09/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.neucli.2015.08.002 · 1.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A typical example of practical realization of such resonant dynamics is a post-traumatic adjustment of excitation in nerves with impaired excitability. It was shown that impaired excitation may be restored by applying additional functional electrical stimulation using implantable [7] or body surface stimulation electrodes [8-10]. This method has been confirmed as an effective tool for restoration of movement of paralyzed muscles in individuals with a variety of neurological impairments [11]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT: We introduce a novel approach of stabilizing the dynamics of excitation waves by spatially extended sub-threshold periodic forcing. Entrainment of unstable primary waves has been studied numerically for different amplitudes and frequencies of additional sub-threshold stimuli. We determined entrainment regimes under which excitation blocks were transformed into consistent 1:1 responses. These responses were spatially homogeneous and synchronized in the entire excitable medium. Compared to primary pulses, pulses entrained by secondary stimulations were stable at considerably shorter periods which decreased at higher amplitudes and greater number of secondary stimuli. Our results suggest a practical methodology for stabilization of excitation in reaction-diffusion media such as nerve tissue with regions of reduced excitability.
    Nonlinear Biomedical Physics 09/2011; 5(1):8. DOI:10.1186/1753-4631-5-8
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to determine the applicability of magnetic stimulation and magnetic motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in motor asymmetry studies by obtaining quantitative and qualitative measures of efferent activity during low intensity magnetic stimulation of the dominant and non-dominant lower extremities. Magnetic stimulation of the tibial nerve in the popliteal fossa was performed in 10 healthy male right-handed and right-footed young adults. Responses were recorded from the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscles of the right and left lower extremities. Response characteristics (duration, onset latency, amplitude) were analyzed in relation to the functional dominance of the limbs and in relation to the direction of the current in the magnetic coil by use of the Wilcoxon pair sequence test. The CCW direction of coil current was related to reduced amplitudes of recorded MEPs. Greater amplitudes of evoked potentials were recorded in the non-dominant extremity, both in the CW and CCW coil current directions, with the statistical significance of this effect (p=0.005). No differences in duration of response were found in the CW current direction, while in CCW the time of the left-side response was prolonged (p=0.01). In the non-dominant extremity longer onset latencies were recorded in both current directions, but only for the CW direction the side asymmetries showed a statistical significance of p=0.005. In the dominant extremity the stimulation correlated with stronger paresthesias, especially using the CCW direction of coil current. The results indicate that low intensity magnetic stimulation may be useful in quantitative and qualitative research into the motor asymmetry.
    Neuroscience Letters 06/2009; 459(2):74-8. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.05.006 · 2.03 Impact Factor
Show more