Article

Comparison of 4 diets of varying glycemic load on weight loss and cardiovascular risk reduction in overweight and obese young adults - A randomized controlled trial

Human Nutrition Unit, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Archives of Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 13.25). 07/2006; 166(14):1466-75. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.14.1466
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the popularity of low-glycemic index (GI) and high-protein diets, to our knowledge no randomized, controlled trials have systematically compared their relative effects on weight loss and cardiovascular risk.
A total of 129 overweight or obese young adults (body mass index, > or =25 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the square of height in meters]) were assigned to 1 of 4 reduced-fat, high-fiber diets for 12 weeks. Diets 1 and 2 were high carbohydrate (55% of total energy intake), with high and low GIs, respectively; diets 3 and 4 were high protein (25% of total energy intake), with high and low GIs, respectively. The glycemic load was highest in diet 1 and lowest in diet 4. Changes in weight, body composition, and blood chemistry profile were studied.
While all groups lost a similar mean +/- SE percentage of weight (diet 1, -4.2% +/- 0.6%; diet 2, -5.5% +/- 0.5%; diet 3, -6.2% +/- 0.4%; and diet 4, -4.8% +/- 0.7%; P = .09), the proportion of subjects in each group who lost 5% or more of body weight varied significantly by diet (diet 1, 31%; diet 2, 56%; diet 3, 66%; and diet 4, 33%; P = .01). Women on diets 2 and 3 lost approximately 80% more fat mass (-4.5 +/- 0.5 [mean +/- SE] kg and -4.6 +/- 0.5 kg) than those on diet 1 (-2.5 +/- 0.5 kg; P = .007). Mean +/- SE low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol levels declined significantly in the diet 2 group (-6.6 +/- 3.9 mg/dL [-0.17 +/- 0.10 mmol/L]) but increased in the diet 3 group (+10.0 +/- 3.9 mg/dL [+0.26 +/- 0.10 mmol/L]; P = .02). Goals for energy distribution were not achieved exactly: both carbohydrate groups ate less fat, and the diet 2 group ate more fiber.
Both high-protein and low-GI regimens increase body fat loss, but cardiovascular risk reduction is optimized by a high-carbohydrate, low-GI diet.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Peter Petocz, Jul 07, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
138 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The term dietary fibre (indigestible carbohydrates of plant origin) encompasses a range of divergent compounds that differentially affect numerous important gastrointestinal and systemic bodily processes.The main role of the gut is to absorb nutrients following digestion. Complex neurohumoral pathways control gut secretion and motility. Dietary fibres that inhibit intestinal digestive processes result in decreased upper GI transit times, which may affect satiety and satiation.The large intestine houses a varied microflora. Dietary fibre is a major energy source for these bacteria, and therefore markedly affects microfloral diversity/toxicity. Dietary fibres can also affect innate immune responses of the gut mucosa both directly and indirectly.Dietary fibre impacts all processes of the gut, which as a result may impact on cardiovascular/systemic health. As many commonly-used hydrocolloids are viscous, palatable dietary fibres, they have the potential to be used in acceptable foodstuffs that offer a wide range of added health benefits.
    Food Hydrocolloids 03/2011; 25(2):238-250. DOI:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.11.013 · 4.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background/objectives:In men with established cardiovascular disease, the effect of diets with high glycemic index (GI) and glycemic load (GL) is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that diets with higher GI and GL are associated with increased mortality in men with established cardiovascular disease.Subjects/methods:We measured dietary GI and GL using food-frequency questionnaires in 4617 men, 45–79 years old, with a history of cardiovascular disease. The men were followed for cardiovascular mortality (6-year follow-up, 608 cases) and all-cause mortality (8-year follow-up, 1303 cases) using the Swedish cause-of-death and death registers. We used Cox models with age as the timescale and adjusted for body mass index, physical activity, history of hypertension and diabetes, family history of myocardial infarction, aspirin use, cigarette smoking and dietary factors to estimate incidence rate ratios (RRs).Results:Comparing top to bottom quartiles of dietary GI, the RR for cardiovascular mortality was 0.86 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.10, P for linear trend=0.21), and the RR for all-cause mortality was 1.00 (95% CI 0.85–1.19, P for linear trend=0.87). Compared to quartile 1, the RR for men with dietary GL in quartile 4 was 1.02 (95% CI 0.70–1.49, P for linear trend=0.81) for cardiovascular and 1.15 (95% CI 0.89–1.49, P for linear trend=0.20) for all-cause mortality.Conclusions:In this population of men with prior cardiovascular disease, dietary GI and GL were not associated with cardiovascular or all-cause mortality.
    European journal of clinical nutrition 04/2010; 64(4):439. DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2010.11 · 2.95 Impact Factor