Article

Ecological Significance of Residual Exposures and Effects from the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill

Harwell Gentile & Associates, LC, Hammock, Florida 32137, USA.
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 07/2009; 2(3):204-46. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.5630020303
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT An ecological significance framework is used to assess the ecological condition of Prince William Sound (PWS), Alaska, USA, in order to address the current management question: 17 y following the Exxon Valdez oil spill (EVOS), are there any remaining and continuing ecologically significant exposures or effects on the PWS ecosystem caused by EVOS? We examined the extensive scientific literature funded by the Exxon Valdez Trustees or by ExxonMobil to assess exposures and effects from EVOS. Criteria to assess ecological significance include whether a change in a valued ecosystem component (VEC) is sufficient to affect the structure, function, and/or health of the system and whether such a change exceeds natural variability. The EVOS occurred on 24 March 1989, releasing over 250,000 barrels of crude oil into PWS. Because PWS is highly dynamic, the residual oil was largely eliminated in the first few years, and now only widely dispersed, highly weathered, or isolated small pockets of residual contamination remain. Many other sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) exist in PWS from past or present human activities or natural oil seeps. Multiple-lines-of-evidence analyses indicate that residual PAHs from EVOS no longer represent an ecologically significant exposure risk to PWS. To assess the ecological significance of any residual effects from EVOS, we examined the literature on more than 20 VECs, including primary producers, filter feeders, fish and bird primary consumers, fish and bird top predators, a bird scavenger, mammalian primary consumers and top predators, biotic communities, ecosystem-level properties of trophodynamics and biogeochemical processes, and landscape-level properties of habitat mosaic and wilderness quality. None of these has any ecologically significant effects that are detectable at present, with the exception of 1 pod of orcas and possibly 1 subpopulation of sea otters; however, in both those cases, PWS-wide populations appear to have fully recovered. Many other stressors continue to affect PWS adversely, including climate and oceanographic variability, increased tourism and shipping, invasive species, the 1964 earthquake, and overexploitation of marine resources, with associated cascading effects on populations of PWS fish and predators. We conclude that the PWS ecosystem has now effectively recovered from EVOS.

Full-text

Available from: Mark A Harwell, Feb 26, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
93 Views
  • Source
    01/2011; National Energy Board of Canada. 259 p. Available: https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/ll-eng/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/90463/621169/700096/704342/A2A8R2_-_NEB_State_of_Knowledge_Review_of_Fate_and_Effect_of_Oil_DFO_COOGER.pdf?nodeid=704343&vernum=0.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Petroleum perhaps is one of the most important substances to the modern society, due to its wide use in the most diverse productive sectors. Besides serving as raw material to the production of plastics and other compounds, it is the fuel source used in the production of electric energy, in industries and in the different transport sectors. However, the ecosystems located in areas of extractions, processing and distribution of petroleum end up being highly susceptible to the direct and indirect impacts of these activities, as well as those located in their transport route. As the large extraction fields are located in coastal areas, these environments are, generally, the most affected, although other ecosystems also suffer influence of the petroleum activities. Oils spills and leakages provoke immediate effects into the environment, easily viewed by the generalized mortality of animals and consequent ecosystems losses, but also provoke more persistent effects, such as alteration of the animals behaviour and permanence of compounds derived from petroleum in the food webs. Accidents with petroleum are unpredictable and the resources needed to minimize their impacts, often, are not liable to an immediate application. Among the strategies developed to recover the impacted environments, there are the mechanical cleaning methods, use of chemical dispersant products and use of bioremediation treatments. Cleaning methods of areas contaminated by petroleum are only considered effective when they prevent the migration of this pollutant to more sensitive ecosystems. Now, the bioremediation has been considered a "green" alternative for treatment of dangerous contaminants since it uses organisms naturally able to reduce, remove and transform the organic and inorganic pollutants. The success of this process depends on it natural biodegradability, bioavailability and optimization of the biological activities related to the pollutant. Among the strategies available to perform the natural bioremediation there are the natural attenuation, bioventilation, biomagnification, biostimlation, landfarming, composting and phytoremediation. In this chapter it will be discussed the concepts related to the impacts caused by petroleum and its derivatives, as well as the ecological consequences of some petroleum accidents and the efficiency of the application of the environmental decontamination techniques, such as bioremediation, since this is an effective strategy, economically viable and that provides a lower environmental impact.
    Oil Spills: Environmental Issues, Prevention and Ecological Impacts, 1 edited by Adam Clifton, 08/2014: chapter Oil Spills: Environmental Consequences and Recovery Strategies: pages 87-119; Nova Science Publishers., ISBN: 978-1-63321-548-1
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on the grid analysis of GIS, with the combination of habitat suitability assessment and human interference analysis, the ecological sensitivity evaluation model was established. Firstly, the endangered water‐birds in Yellow River Delta NNR were prioritized as a database according to IUCN 2007 Red List, and the habitat preference was identified and evaluated through literatures review and field survey. By establishing GIS‐based 200 × 200 m grid system, the existing habitat was evaluated on landscape‐level, and a comprehensive habitat suitability index (CHSI) was developed and calculated by habitat suitability assessment model. Based on CHSI, the habitat suitability was evaluated and graded. Secondly, the typical species cranes was selected from the established database as indicator species and the habitat loss rate of indicator species associated with anthropogenic interference (roads and oil wells) was also analyzed on 200 × 200 m grids by GIS. Finally, on the basis of results from habitat suitability evaluation and human interference analysis, ecological sensitivity analysis was conducted by overlying operation. The results showed that: the ecological sensitivity of study area was quite high on the whole; the overall distribution was high in the coastal region while low in the inland region, ranking in five classes. In the area, extreme sensitivity zone and fair sensitivity zone accounted for about 55.74%, the moderate sensitivity zone was about 16.2%, the sensitivity zone and no sensitivity zone constituted 22.81 and 5.19%, respectively. In addition, compared with existing function zones, related suggestions for adjusting function zones were proposed aiming at enhancing the conservation efficacy of critical habitats.
    CLEAN - Soil Air Water 10/2012; 40(10). DOI:10.1002/clen.201200051 · 1.84 Impact Factor