Article

MIL-96, a porous aluminum trimesate 3D structure constructed from a hexagonal network of 18-membered rings and mu(3)-oxo-centered trinuclear units

Institut Lavoisier (UMR CNRS 8180), Institut Universitaire de France, Porous Solids Group, Tectospin, Université de Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, 45, avenue des Etats-Unis, 78035 Versailles, France.
Journal of the American Chemical Society (Impact Factor: 11.44). 09/2006; 128(31):10223-30. DOI: 10.1021/ja0621086
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A new aluminum trimesate Al12O(OH)18(H2O)3(Al2(OH)4)[btc]6.24H2O, denominated MIL-96, was synthesized under mild hydrothermal conditions (210 degrees C, 24 h) in the presence of 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid (trimesic acid or H3btc) in water. Hexagonal crystals, allowing a single-crystal XRD analysis, are grown from a mixture of trimethyl 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylate (Me3btc), HF, and TEOS. The MIL-96 structure exhibits a three-dimensional (3D) framework containing isolated trinuclear mu3-oxo-bridged aluminum clusters and infinite chains of AlO4(OH)2 and AlO2(OH)4 octahedra forming a honeycomb lattice based on 18-membered rings. The two types of aluminum groups are connected to each other through the trimesate species, which induce corrugated chains of aluminum octahedra, linked via mu2-hydroxo bonds with the specific -cis-cis-trans- sequence. The 3D framework of MIL-96 reveals three types of cages. Two of them, centered at the special positions 0 0 0 and 2/3 1/3 1/4, have estimated pore volumes of 417 and 635 A3, respectively, and encapsulate free water molecules. The third one has a smaller pore volume and contains disordered aluminum octahedral species (Al(OH)6). The solid-state NMR characterization is consistent with crystal structure and elemental and thermal analyses. The four aluminum crystallographic sites are resolved by means of 27Al 3QMAS technique. This product is able to sorb both carbon dioxide and methane at room temperature (4.4 mmol.g(-1) for CO2 and 1.95 mmol.g(-1) for CH4 at 10 bar) and hydrogen at 77 K (1.91 wt % under 3 bar).

0 Bookmarks
 · 
127 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Structural characterization of metalorganic frameworks (MOFs) is crucial, since an understanding of the relationship between the macroscopic properties of these industrially relevant materials and their molecular-level structures allows for the development of new applications and improvements in current performance. In many MOFs, the incorporated metal centers dictate the short- and long-range structure and porosity of the material. Here we demonstrate that solid-state NMR (SSNMR) spectroscopy targeting NMR-active metal centers at natural abundance, in concert with ab initio density functional theory (DFT) calculations and X-ray diffraction (XRD), is a powerful tool for elucidating the molecular-level structure of MOFs. Zr-91 SSNMR experiments on MIL-140A are paired with DFT calculations and geometry optimizations in order to detect inaccuracies in the reported powder XRD crystal structure. In-115 and La-139 SSNMR experiments on sets of related MOFs at two different magnetic fields illustrate the sensitivity of the In-115/La-139 electric field gradient tensors to subtle differences in coordination, bond length distribution, and ligand geometry about the metal center. Ti-47/49 SSNMR experiments reflect the presence or absence of guest solvent in MIL-125(Ti), and when combined with DFT calculations, these SSNMR experiments permit the study of local hydroxyl group configurations within the MOF channels. Zn-67 SSNMR experiments and DFT calculations are also used to explore the geometry near Zn within a set of four MOFs as well as local disordering caused by distributions of different linkers around the metal. SSNMR spectroscopy of metal centers offers an impressive addition to the arsenal of techniques for MOF characterization and is particularly useful in cases where XRD information may be ambiguous, incomplete, or unavailable.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 10/2014; 118(41):23728-23744. DOI:10.1021/jp5063868 · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Systematic investigation of the reactions of the system AlCl3 center dot 6H2O/pyridine-2,4,6-tricarboxylic acid (H3PTC)/pyridine in water yielded two new compounds, both containing the dimeric {AlPTC(mu-OH)(H2O)}(2)(2-) unit. With long reaction times, the framework compound [Al(mu-OH){AlPTC(mu-OH)(H2O)}(2)]center dot 2H(2)O (CAU-16, compound 1) is obtained, the first example of a framework compound with a metalorganic cluster linker, and bearing the MIL-53 network. Although the compound does not breathe, as other MIL-53 compounds do, it has a maximum uptake of CO2 of 1.76(2) mmol g(1) at 196 K. With shorter reaction times, the molecular compound {Al(HPTC)(mu-OH)(H2O)}(2) (2) was prepared, leading to the proposal of a crystallization scheme for the Al3+-pyridine-2,4,6,-tricarboxylic acid system. To determine whether further framework compounds bearing hybrid metal cluster linkers could be prepared, systematic high-throughput investigations of pyridine-2,4,6-tricarboxylic acid in water with Ga3+ and In3+ were undertaken. These yielded two chain-type compounds, GaPTC(H2O)(2) (3) and InPTC(H2O)(2) (4), with different coordination chemistries. Optimized syntheses for compounds 1, 2, and 4 are reported.
    Crystal Growth & Design 10/2014; 14(10):5310-5317. DOI:10.1021/cg501189n · 4.56 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: By using the ionic liquid 1-butyl-2,3-dimethylimidazolium bromide ([Bmmim]Br) as solvent and reactant, a magnesium(II) metal complex, namely, [Bmmim][Mg3(oba)3(obaH)] (1) (obaH2 = 4,4′-oxybis(benzoic acid)) has been synthesized ionothermally, which represents the first Mg(II)-oba metal-organic framework. Single-crystal X-ray analysis indicated that the structure of 1 featured a three-dimensionally anionic framework of [Mg3(oba)3(obaH)]nn−. Photoluminescence measurements revealed that 1 exhibited strong emission at 387 nm ascribed to ligand-to-metal charge transfer.
    Inorganic Chemistry Communications 10/2012; 24:166-169. DOI:10.1016/j.inoche.2012.06.024 · 2.06 Impact Factor