Time of day effects on the incidence of anesthetic adverse events

Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States
Quality and Safety in Health Care (Impact Factor: 2.16). 08/2006; 15(4):258-63. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.017566
Source: PubMed


We hypothesized that time of day of surgery would influence the incidence of anesthetic adverse events (AEs).
Clinical observations reported in a quality improvement database were categorized into different AEs that reflected (1) error, (2) harm, and (3) other AEs (error or harm could not be determined) and were analyzed for effects related to start hour of care.
As expected, there were differences in the rate of AEs depending on start hour of care. Compared with a reference start hour of 7 am, other AEs were more frequent for cases starting during the 3 pm and 4 pm hours (p < 0.0001). Post hoc inspection of data revealed that the predicted probability increased from a low of 1.0% at 9 am to a high of 4.2% at 4 pm. The two most common event types (pain management and postoperative nausea and vomiting) may be primary determinants of these effects.
Our results indicate that clinical outcomes may be different for patients anesthetized at the end of the work day compared with the beginning of the day. Although this may result from patient related factors, medical care delivery factors such as case load, fatigue, and care transitions may also be influencing the rate of anesthetic AEs for cases that start in the late afternoon.

Download full-text


Available from: Jonathan Mark, Jul 25, 2014
  • Source
    • "In terms of timing as a risk factor, radiotherapy incidents were more common in afternoons compared to mornings. In anaesthesiology , afternoon surgeries resulted in more adverse events and this could be attributable to factors such as fatigue and circadian rhythm lows or dips [23] [24]. Such precipitants may be responsible for the higher rate of afternoon radiotherapy incidents and perhaps , breaks and shift changes may be more valuable after midday when the risk of incidents is higher. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To ascertain the rate, type, significance, trends and the potential risk factors associated with radiotherapy incidents in a large academic department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for all radiotherapy activities from July 2001 to January 2011 were reviewed from radiotherapy incident reporting forms. Patient and treatment data were obtained from the radiotherapy record and verification database (MOSAIQ) and the patient database (HOSPRO). Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine variables associated with radiotherapy incidents. RESULTS: In that time, 65,376 courses of radiotherapy were delivered with a reported incident rate of 2.64 per 100 courses. The rate of incidents per course increased (1.96 per 100 courses to 3.52 per 100 courses, p<0.001) whereas the proportion of reported incidents resulting in >5% deviation in dose (10.50 to 2.75%, p<0.001) had decreased after the introduction of an online electronic reporting system. The following variables were associated with an increased rate of incidents: afternoon treatment time, paediatric patients, males, inpatients, palliative plans, head-and-neck, skin, sarcoma and haematological malignancies. In general, complex plans were associated with higher incidence rates. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy incidents were infrequent and most did not result in significant dose deviation. A number of risk factors were identified and these could be used to highlight high-risk cases in the future. Introduction of an online electronic reporting system resulted in a significant increase in the number of incidents being reported.
    Radiotherapy and Oncology 08/2014; 112(2). DOI:10.1016/j.radonc.2014.07.011 · 4.36 Impact Factor

  • AORN journal 12/2006; 84(6):1063-1068. DOI:10.1016/S0001-2092(06)64004-0
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thousands of international aeromedical evacuations are conducted every year. An increasing number of travelers are elderly or have chronic illnesses, and there is more travel to regions where road trauma and infectious diseases are endemic but dependable medical care is not available. This review explains the indications for aeromedical evacuation, as well as the logistics, safety considerations, and principles of in-flight care for sick or injured patients.
    New England Journal of Medicine 02/2007; 356(3):262-70. DOI:10.1056/NEJMra063651 · 55.87 Impact Factor
Show more