National Survey of Psychotherapy Training in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Social Work

Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Archives of General Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 14.48). 09/2006; 63(8):925-34. DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.8.925
Source: PubMed


Approximately 3% of the US population receives psychotherapy each year from psychiatrists, psychologists, or social workers. A modest number of psychotherapies are evidence-based therapy (EBT) in that they have been defined in manuals and found efficacious in at least 2 controlled clinical trials with random assignment that include a control condition of psychotherapy, placebo, pill, or other treatment and samples of sufficient power with well-characterized patients. Few practitioners use EBT.
To determine the amount of EBT taught in accredited training programs in psychiatry, psychology (PhD and PsyD), and social work and to note whether the training was elective or required and presented as a didactic (coursework) or clinical supervision.
A cross-sectional survey of a probability sample of all accredited training programs in psychiatry, psychology, and social work in the United States. Responders included training directors (or their designates) from 221 programs (73 in psychiatry, 63 in PhD clinical psychology, 21 in PsyD psychology, and 64 in master's-level social work). The overall response rate was 73.7%. Main Outcome Measure Requiring both a didactic and clinical supervision in an EBT.
Although programs offered electives in EBT and non-EBT, few required both a didactic and clinical supervision in EBT, and most required training was non-EBT. Psychiatry required coursework and clinical supervision in the largest percentage of EBT (28.1%). Cognitive behavioral therapy was the EBT most frequently offered and required as a didactic in all 3 disciplines. More than 90% of the psychiatry training programs were complying with the new cognitive behavior therapy requirement. The 2 disciplines with the largest number of students and emphasis on clinical training-professional clinical psychology (PsyD) and social work-had the largest percentage of programs (67.3% and 61.7%, respectively) not requiring a didactic and clinical supervision in any EBT.
There is a considerable gap between research evidence for psychotherapy and clinical training. Until the training programs in the major disciplines providing psychotherapy increase training in EBT, the gap between research evidence and clinical practice will remain.

Download full-text


Available from: Helen Verdeli, Feb 01, 2014
1 Follower
61 Reads
  • Source
    • "To chart the state of the art on exposure dissemination more exhaustively, we wished to gain insight into the reasons why mental health professionals do or do not use exposure by including questions on their training and professional attitudes about exposure treatments . In previous studies, for instance, therapists gave deficiency or absence of specialized training as the main reason for not using exposure-based therapies (Külz et al. 2010; Weissman et al. 2006; Becker et al. 2004). In our current survey we hence paid special attention to the type of exposure training therapists had received and the extent to which this was considered satisfactory. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although research has shown exposure therapy to have earned its rank among empirically supported treatments (ESTs) for anxiety disorders, several US-based studies suggest it to be underused in clinical practice. Data on exposure use in Europe is mainly lacking, whereas its state of dissemination in countries such as the Netherlands has remained uncharted. Therefore, this study examined the use of exposure therapy among members of the Dutch Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Therapy (VGCt), as well as explored therapist, educational and contextual variables that could facilitate its dissemination in clinical practice. Respondents (n = 490) were surveyed on clinical interventions used in their treatment for social anxiety disorder, phobia, OCD and panic disorder. Data was collected on the use of (disorder) specific interventions, therapists' attitudes on exposure, treatment experience, current educational status, educational background and workplace characteristics. Analysis of the data showed that most therapists implemented exposure frequently, but that exposure use still warrants improvement, specifically for certain (disorder-specific) interventions that were accordingly underused. Confirming our hypothesis, we found that clinicians who practiced exposure regularly also reported a greater willingness to use the treatment, perceived the method as more credible, and saw fewer barriers for its usage than those who did so less. The use of (disorder-) specific interventions, such as in vivo exposure (therapist as well as self-directed), exposure and response prevention for OCD, and interoceptive exposure for panic disorder, was positively related to level of education. While most were satisfied with the training they had received, therapists did report a need for additional instruction in targeted practical, empirical, and diagnostic skills. Our findings support the conclusion that the dissemination of exposure therapy in the Netherlands progresses well, but that education in certain (disorder-specific) techniques merits augmentation. To bridge the gap between research and clinical practice, future research should therefore focus on new, preferably blended approaches to training clinicians in exposure techniques.
    08/2015; 3(1):26. DOI:10.1186/s40359-015-0083-2
  • Source
    • "Ironically, yet with some notable exceptions , the very institutions actively engaged in EBT research often provide limited opportunities for students to learn EBT (Bertram, Charnin, Kerns, & Long, 2014). An earlier survey found that very few graduate training programs require both didactic and clinical supervision in any EBT: psychiatry (28.1%), psychology (PhD 16.5% and PsyD 11.5%), and social work (9.8%; Weissman et al., 2006). The lack of EBT-specific educational opportunities for students contributes to a significant disparity between the approximately 20% of the population with behavioral health needs (New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, 2003) and the number of available clinicians with EBT competency (Hoge, Huey, & O'Connell, 2004; Mazade & Glover, 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: States and jurisdictions are under increased pressure to demonstrate the use of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) for children’s mental health, increasing the demand for a workforce trained in these practices. Universities are a critical pipeline for this workforce. This article describes the genesis and evolution of a university-based initiative for training in EBTs for children, youth, and families. Given both the need to make training in EBTs available to future providers in a range of disciplines and that mental health providers increasingly find themselves on interdisciplinary teams (despite universitybased training being relatively siloed along disciplinary lines), the initiative has had an interdisciplinary focus. Two tracks are described: (a) Practitioner Track, a course series in which students learn a specific EBT, and (b) Referral Track, a monthly lecture series designed to engage a wider university and community audience. Results of the program evaluation component of this initiative revealed that students can significantly increase their skills and self-efficacy in components of EBT delivery through participation in the active, skill-focused courses. Furthermore, the results of the lecture series evaluation appear to meet an important need for community-based providers and other supportive individuals in transferring useful knowledgeabout best practices. Implications and future directions are discussed.
    Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders 04/2015; DOI:10.1177/1063426615583457 · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Conversely, barriers to implementation include (but are not limited to) time constraints, beliefs about the use of psychosocial interventions in schools, and competing job demands (Forman, Olin, Hoagwood, Crowe, & Sake, 2009). Among the potentially malleable factors impacting EBP implementation, provider training is often highlighted as a promising means to facilitate the uptake of EBPs (e.g., Fixsen, Naoom, Blase, Friedman, & Wallace, 2005; Greenhalgh, Robert, MacFarlane, Bate, & Kyriakidou, 2004), partially because there are too few providers adequately trained in the use of EBPs (Kazdin, 2008; Weissman et al., 2006). Still, given the myriad of implementation barriers in schools, training alone is unlikely to produce consistent and sustained change (cf. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Traditional approaches to school consultation involve a voluntary, collaborative relationship between a consultant and teacher consultee to develop interventions for students with special needs, often over long periods, with ongoing problem solving and performance feedback. However, with the advent of multi-tiered systems of support, school consultation has evolved into a strategy to support the systemic adoption of evidence-based practices (EBPs). With this shift, consultants increasingly fulfill the role of coach, moving beyond traditional collaborative relationships to address the professional development needs of consultees. Consequently, researchers examining school consultation have moved beyond questions of feasibility and acceptability and have entered a new era of implementation science. This special issue of School Mental Health examines contemporary applications of school consultation and coaching in support of EBP implementation. The five original research articles in the special issue advance the literature in this developing field.
    School Mental Health 03/2015; 7(1). DOI:10.1007/s12310-015-9142-3
Show more