Addressing racial and ethnic disparities in health care: using federal data to support local programs to eliminate disparities.

Brigham and Women's Hospital, Division of General Medicine, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120, USA.
Health Services Research (Impact Factor: 2.49). 09/2006; 41(4 Pt 1):1451-68. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00549.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To reduce racial and ethnic disparities in health care, managers, policy makers, and researchers need valid and reliable data on the race and ethnicity of individuals and populations. The federal government is one of the most important sources of such data. In this paper we review the strengths and weaknesses of federal data that pertain to racial and ethnic disparities in health care. We describe recent developments that are likely to influence how these data can be used in the future and discuss how local programs could make use of these data.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The elimination of racial and ethnic disparities in health has become a national priority in the United States (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy people 2010: understanding and improving health, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2000). These disparities have many causes and potential solutions. In the landmark Unequal Treatment report, the Institute of Medicine reviewed and highlighted racial and ethnic disparities in health care as an important factor contributing to disparities in health outcomes (Institute of Medicine, Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002). This report concluded with a strong call for action to eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in the US healthcare system. Since 2003, the federal government has issued an annual National Healthcare Disparities Report to monitor racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in access to care and quality of care. Whereas the initial report released by the federal Department of Health and Human Services generated considerable controversy and debate about the content and interpretation of key findings (Bloche, N Engl J Med 350(15):1568–70, 2004), subsequent reports have become a useful tool for tracking national trends in disparities across a wide array of quality measures. In 2004, this report found that lower quality of care was experienced by African Americans for two-thirds of measures, by Hispanics for one-half of measures, and by American Indians/Alaskan Natives for one-third of measures (Moy et al., Health Aff (Millwood) 24(2):376–87, 2005). In this chapter, five principles are presented to guide policy makers, health care leaders, and healthcare professionals seeking to reduce and ultimately eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in health care. These principles are based on clinical and policy experience, the research literature on healthcare disparities, and findings and recommendations of key reports from the Institute of Medicine (Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2002) and the American College of Physicians (Groman and Ginsburg, Ann Intern Med 141(3):226–32, 2004). The principles have been refined with input from an advisory committee of clinical and academic leaders in minority health care convened by the Minority Health Institute. The principles address aspects of access to care and quality of care that are especially important for minority populations in the United States, including African Americans, Latinos, Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders, and American Indians and Alaska Natives. These principles have become more timely and attainable with passage of the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) that was enacted by Congress and signed by President Obama in March 2010.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer of both men and women in the US. In 2007, an estimated 153,760 men and women received a diagnosis of colon or rectal cancer, and 52,180 individuals died of the disease (Cancer of the Colon and Rectum 2007). Substantial literature documents that both the US incidence of CRC and mortality rates from the disease are not evenly distributed throughout the general population but vary by age, gender, race, ethnicity, educational attainment, income, and geography. Other factors, such as lacking health insurance, have also been associated with increased mortality from CRC.
    12/2008: pages 161-178;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assessing health status is a core function of public health on the state level. This report summarizes the data available in each state for health assessment, a necessary step in achieving public health goals. Using the leading indicators from Healthy People 2010, the authors found that while data generally are available across all states, gaps do exist. Across states, data sometimes are not available for a few specific health objectives and for certain age groups.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jul 24, 2014