Hemodynamics of high-performance bileaflet valves: Comparison to simulated clinical Doppler measurements

Clinic for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Medical Faculty RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
The Journal of heart valve disease (Impact Factor: 0.75). 08/2006; 15(4):549-56.
Source: PubMed


The newly designed, so-called 'high performance' bileaflet heart valve prostheses are suggested to be especially beneficial in small sizes. Herein, valvular energy loss and transvalvular gradients were evaluated using an in-vitro pulsatile flow model for aortic prostheses (St. Jude Medical Regent and On-X, sizes 19-23 mm). Gradients were compared with simulated clinically derived Doppler gradients to determine the extent of pressure recovery.
Valves were analyzed using a pulsatile circulatory mock loop simulator at heart rates of 70 and 110 bpm, and at cardiac outputs of 2, 4, 5, and 7 l/min, respectively (FDA requirements). Measurements consisted of computed calculation of energy loss and determination of mean pressure gradient by pressure transducers. A Doppler probe was mounted into the device for simultaneous measurement of Doppler gradient according to the Bernoulli equation.
The systolic energy loss of the SJM Regent valve averaged 5.0 +/- 4.6% (range: 0.2 to 14.9%) of the effective forward energy, while that for the On-X valve was 6.5% (range: 0.7-22.8%). Total energy loss was 9.9% (range: 4.8-22.1%) for the SJM Regent valve, and 12.7% (range: 6.5-27.7%) for the On-X valve. The average extent of pressure recovery was 64% for both valve types.
All tested valves were characterized by excellent hemodynamic performance, with overall low systolic and total energy losses, but results were slightly favorable for the SJM Regent valve. Valve performance was concluded to be much better than expected by clinical routine Doppler measurements, which significantly overestimates transvalvular gradients; this effect was explained by pressure recovery. Nevertheless, Doppler gradient remains a valuable follow up technique for patients with heart valve prostheses.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: (ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, Volume 25, October 2008)
    Echocardiography 11/2008; 25(9):1016-8. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8175.2008.00770.x · 1.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Four different bileaflet mechanical prostheses are currently utilized for valve replacement in the United States. We reviewed the different designs, hemodynamic features, and long-term outcomes of each of these prostheses. Bileaflet mechanical valves provide excellent long-term durability and overall superb hemodynamic performance. Subtle design modifications have maximized the effective orifice area per given valve size, which minimizes outflow gradients in smaller sizes. These newer-generation valves require a lower level of anticoagulation compared with older models. Compared with bioprosthetic valves, freedom from structural valve deterioration and reoperation is significantly better with bileaflet mechanical valves. However, hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications related to anticoagulation remain a major limitation. Bileaflet mechanical valves are a valuable option for patients undergoing valve replacement surgery. All of the bileaflet designs provide good hemodynamic performance with long-term durability. However, some designs may provide better hemodynamic profiles in smaller valve sizes. Furthermore, newer models may have a more favorable thromboembolic profile. Nonetheless, the risk of anticoagulant-related complications with mechanical valves must be weighed against the risks of structural deterioration and reoperation of bioprostheses. Ultimately, the choice of prosthesis should be made after careful discussion with the patient, referring cardiologist, and cardiac surgeon.
    Current opinion in cardiology 04/2009; 24(2):136-41. DOI:10.1097/HCO.0b013e328324e698 · 2.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Blood damage and thrombosis are major complications that are commonly seen in patients with implanted mechanical heart valves. For this in vitro study, we isolated the closing phase of a bileaflet mechanical heart valve to study near valve fluid velocities and stresses. By manipulating the valve housing, we gained optical access to a previously inaccessible region of the flow. Laser Doppler velocimetry and particle image velocimetry were used to characterize the flow regime and help to identify the key design characteristics responsible for high shear and rotational flow. Impact of the closing mechanical leaflet with its rigid housing produced the highest fluid stresses observed during the cardiac cycle. Mean velocities as high as 2.4 m/s were observed at the initial valve impact. The velocities measured at the leaflet tip resulted in sustained shear rates in the range of 1500-3500 s(-1), with peak values on the order of 11,000-23,000 s(-1). Using velocity maps, we identified regurgitation zones near the valve tip and through the central orifice of the valve. Entrained flow from the transvalvular jets and flow shed off the leaflet tip during closure combined to generate a dominant vortex posterior to both leaflets after each valve closing cycle. The strength of the peripheral vortex peaked within 2 ms of the initial impact of the leaflet with the housing and rapidly dissipated thereafter, whereas the vortex near the central orifice continued to grow during the rebound phase of the valve. Rebound of the leaflets played a secondary role in sustaining closure-induced vortices.
    Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 09/2011; 133(9):094507. DOI:10.1115/1.4005167 · 1.78 Impact Factor