Long-Term Effects of 6-Week Whole-Body Vibration on Balance Recovery and Activities of Daily Living in the Postacute Phase of Stroke A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Sint Maartenskliniek Research, Development & Education, P.O. Box 9011, 6500 GM, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stroke (Impact Factor: 6.02). 10/2006; 37(9):2331-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000236494.62957.f3
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The long-term effects of 6-weeks whole-body vibration, as a novel method of somatosensory stimulation, on postural control and activities of daily living were compared with those of 6 weeks of exercise therapy on music of the same intensity in the postacute phase of stroke.
Fifty-three patients with moderate to severe functional disabilities were randomized within 6 weeks poststroke and within 3 days after admission to a rehabilitation center to either whole-body vibration or exercise therapy on music in addition to a regular inpatient rehabilitation program. The whole-body vibration group received 4x45-second stimulation on the Galileo 900 (30-Hz frontal plane oscillations of 3-mm amplitude) for 5 days per week during 6 weeks. The exercise therapy on music group received the same amount of exercise therapy on music. Outcome variables included the Berg Balance Scale, Trunk Control Test, Rivermead Mobility Index, Barthel Index, Functional Ambulation Categories, Motricity Index, and somatosensory threshold at 0, 6, and 12 weeks follow up.
At baseline, both groups were comparable in terms of prognostic factors and outcome measures. Both at 6 and 12 weeks follow up, no clinically relevant or statistical differences in outcome were observed between the groups. No side effects were reported.
Daily sessions of whole-body vibration during 6 weeks are not more effective in terms of recovery of balance and activities of daily living than the same amount of exercise therapy on music in the postacute phase of stroke.

Download full-text


Available from: Ronald Meijer, Aug 09, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    • "Ten studies utilized devices to measure balance which included force platform posturography and other COP-related measurements (Jacobson et al., 1997; Eils and Rosenbaum, 2001; van Nes et al., 2004; Risberg et al., 2007; Westlake and Culham, 2007; Ebersbach et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2009; Missaoui and Thoumie, 2009; Röijezon et al., 2009; Eils et al., 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Numerous reports advocate that training of the proprioceptive sense is a viable behavioral therapy for improving impaired motor function. However, there is little agreement of what constitutes proprioceptive training and how effective it is. We therefore conducted a comprehensive, systematic review of the available literature in order to provide clarity to the notion of training the proprioceptive system. Four major scientific databases were searched. The following criteria were subsequently applied: (1) A quantified pre- and post-treatment measure of proprioceptive function. (2) An intervention or training program believed to influence or enhance proprioceptive function. (3) Contained at least one form of treatment or outcome measure that is indicative of somatosensory function. From a total of 1284 articles, 51 studies fulfilled all criteria and were selected for further review. Overall, proprioceptive training resulted in an average improvement of 52% across all outcome measures. Applying muscle vibration above 30 Hz for longer durations (i.e., min vs. s) induced outcome improvements of up to 60%. Joint position and target reaching training consistently enhanced joint position sense (up to 109%) showing an average improvement of 48%. Cortical stroke was the most studied disease entity but no clear evidence indicated that proprioceptive training is differentially beneficial across the reported diseases. There is converging evidence that proprioceptive training can yield meaningful improvements in somatosensory and sensorimotor function. However, there is a clear need for further work. Those forms of training utilizing both passive and active movements with and without visual feedback tended to be most beneficial. There is also initial evidence suggesting that proprioceptive training induces cortical reorganization, reinforcing the notion that proprioceptive training is a viable method for improving sensorimotor function.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 01/2014; 8:1075. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.01075 · 2.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Whole Body Vibration (WBV) is a relatively unexplored therapeutic modality, only having been used previously for strength, conditioning and neuromuscular training purposes. While whole-body-vibration recently has been shown to improve strength and balance in clinical population with stroke, fibromyalgia, and Parkinson's disease [5] [6] [7], it has yet to be applied as a treatment method for controlling pain and improving mobility disorders. The purpose of this study was to describe a case of type II diabetic peripheral small fiber neuropathy with whole body vibration therapy after a failed trial of conventional drugs and interventional pain management. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the study was to describe a case of type II diabetic peripheral small fiber neuropathic pain treated with whole body vibration therapy after a failed trial of conventional drugs and interventional pain management. A 64-year-old male had chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain in his both feet for about 2 years. The patient tried multiple pain medications and various interventional pain treatments without significant pain relief. After 4 weeks of vibration treatment, which targeted the feet the patient's pain level and gait patterns significantly improved. These findings illustrate the importance of considering whole body vibration as a complimentary treatment in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.
    Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 04/2013; 17(2):235-8. DOI:10.1016/j.jbmt.2012.08.007
  • Source
    • "standing on a nonvibrating WBV unit [17] [18]. With this method,subjects easily figure out when they are or are not receiving WBV even if they listen to a tape-recorded sound of a vibrating WBV unit [19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Though popular, there is little agreement on what whole-body vibration (WBV) parameters will optimize performance. This study aimed to clarify the effects of age, sex, hertz and time on four physical function indicators in community-dwelling older adults (N = 32). Participants were exposed to 2 min WBV per session at either 2 Hz or 26 Hz and outcome measures were recorded at 2, 20 and 40 min post-WBV. Timed get up-and-go and chair sit-and-reach performances improved post-WBV for both sexes, were significantly different between 2 Hz and 26 Hz treatments (P ≤ 0.05) and showed statistically significant interactions between age and gender (P ≤ 0.01). Counter movement jump and timed one-legged stance performances showed a similar but non-significant response to 2 Hz and 26 Hz treatments, though male subjects showed a distinct trended response. Age and gender should be statistically controlled and both 2 Hz and 26 Hz exert a treatment effect.
    Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research 09/2011; 2011:747094. DOI:10.1155/2011/747094
Show more