ABSTRACT Many human conceptions are genetically abnormal and end in miscarriage, which is the commonest complication of pregnancy. Recurrent miscarriage, the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies, affects 1% of couples trying to conceive. It is associated with psychological morbidity, and has often proven to be frustrating for both patient and clinician. A third of women attending specialist clinics are clinically depressed, and one in five have levels of anxiety that are similar to those in psychiatric outpatient populations. Many conventional beliefs about the cause and treatment of women with recurrent miscarriage have not withstood scrutiny, but progress has been made. Research has emphasised the importance of recurrent miscarriage in the range of reproductive failure linking subfertility and late pregnancy complications and has allowed us to reject practice based on anecdotal evidence in favour of evidence-based management.
- SourceAvailable from: Zuhal Aydan Saglam[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Cytogenetic investigations are of descriptive importance at spontane-ous abortus for most couples. The conventional cytogenetic analysis of a couple was performed, who were referred to our Department of Medical Genetics for two recurrent abortions and an intrauterine mort fetale at reproductive history. The clinical characteristics of a woman with normal karyotype (46,XX) and a man with 45,XY,rob(13;14) are presented under the light of recent literature.Journal of medical cases 05/2014;
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Background: Recurrent miscarriage (RM) is a frequent obstetric problem. Its’ pathophysiology is poorly understood. Infections, genetic, endocrine, anatomic and immunologic problems have been suggested as causes for RM. Objective: To evaluate the frequency of chromosomal abnormalities and 3 common thrombophilic mutations in couples with RM. Methods: A retrospective data collection was performed for the results of the cytogenetic analysis of the couples and Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) C677T, Factor V Leiden (FVL) G1691A and Prothrombin (PTm) G20210A mutations of the mother in 142 couples suffering from RM. Results: Prevalence of FVL, MTHFR, and PTm gene mutations were similar between cases shaving 2 or ≥3 abortions (P=0.528; P=0.233; P=0.375). In patients with FVL, MTHFR and PTm gene mutations, the OR’s of having ≥3 abortions when compared to having 2 abortions were 1.515 (95% CI: 0.414-5.552), 0.573 (95% CI: 0.228-1.441), and 2.848 (95% CI: 0.355-22.871). All cases with PTm mutation had ≥3 abortions and all abortions occurred between 6-8 gestational weeks. Conclusion: Chromosomal abnormalities and thrombophilic mutations (especially PTm) seem to have an important role in RM. Additional larger studies involving investigation of more genes that may have a role in pregnancy are needed to assess this association.African Health Sciences 03/2014; 14(1):216. · 0.66 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and distribution of cytogenetically abnormal miscarriages in couples with spontaneous abortions (SA) or recurrent miscarriages (RM). Karyotyping of specimens from 164 abortuses with SA and 86 abortuses with RM was successfully performed according to the standard cytogenetic methods using G-banding technique. Among the total 164 cases of SA group, 81 (49.4%) were euploid and the rest (83, 50.6%) showed chromosomal abnormalities. In RM(≥2) and RM(≥3) group, 31 (36.0%)/27 (34.6%) cases were euploid and 55 (64.0%)/51(65.4%) cases were abnormal, respectively. A statistically significant difference was found in the rate of cytogenetic abnormality between SA and RM groups (P<0.05). In all groups, women with advanced maternal age (≥35 years) had a higher rate of chromosome anomalies compared with women younger than age 35 (normal:abnormal = 32.4%:67.6% for ≥35 years and 53.8%:46.2% for <35 years in SA; 19.2%:80.8%/21.7%:78.3% for ≥35 years and 43.3%:56.7%/40.0%:60.0% for <35 years in RM(≥2) and RM(≥3), respectively; P<0.05). In SA group, an increase of normal karyotypes was noted with increased gestational age (<10 week, 38.0%; 10-15 week, 53.5%; 16-20 week, 65.7%). In RM group, most of cases were in <10 week and the frequency of trisomies with chromosomes 1 to 10 were increased compared with that of SA. There was a statistically significant difference in the frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities between SA and RM groups. Our results will provide useful information for diagnosis and genetic counseling of patients with SA or RM.Obstetrics & gynecology science. 11/2014; 57(6):518-525.
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 601
Raj Rai, Lesley Regan
Many human conceptions are genetically abnormal and end in miscarriage, which is the commonest complication of
pregnancy. Recurrent miscarriage, the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies, aff ects 1% of couples trying to
conceive. It is associated with psychological morbidity, and has often proven to be frustrating for both patient and
clinician. A third of women attending specialist clinics are clinically depressed, and one in fi ve have levels of anxiety
that are similar to those in psychiatric outpatient populations. Many conventional beliefs about the cause and
treatment of women with recurrent miscarriage have not withstood scrutiny, but progress has been made. Research
has emphasised the importance of recurrent miscarriage in the range of reproductive failure linking subfertility and
late pregnancy complications and has allowed us to reject practice based on anecdotal evidence in favour of evidence-
Miscarriage, the commonest complication of pregnancy,
is the spontaneous loss of a pregnancy before the fetus
has reached viability. The term therefore includes all
pregnancy losses from the time of conception until
24 weeks of gestation. Although 15% of clinically
recognised pregnancies miscarry, total reproductive losses
are closer to 50% (fi gure 1).1–3 There are two types of
miscarriage: sporadic and
miscarriage aff ects about 1% of couples.4 By contrast, at
least 25% and probably as many as 50% of all women
experience one or more sporadic miscarriages, usually
due to random fetal chromosomal abnormalities,4–6 the
risk of which rises with increasing maternal age.7
Recurrent miscarriage, defi ned as three or more
consecutive pregnancy losses, is part of a range of
reproductive disorders sharing a common underlying
cause (fi gure 2).4–6 Many clinicians defi ne recurrent
miscarriage as two or more losses; this increases the
scale of the problem from 1% to 5% of all couples trying
to conceive.8 Evidence suggests that defects in the depth
and quality of implantation lead to adverse outcomes in
all three trimesters of pregnancy. However, several
features suggest that recurrent miscarriage is a distinct
clinical entity: (1) a woman’s risk of miscarriage is
directly related to the outcomes of previous preg-
nancies,9–12 (2) the observed incidence of recurrent mis-
carriage (1%) is much higher than that expected by
chance alone (0·34%),13 (3) unlike sporadic miscarriage,
recur rent miscarriage tends to occur even if the fetus
has a normal chromosome complement,4,14 and (4) recur-
rent miscarriage tends to aff ect women with specifi c
reproductive characteristics15–18 (table 1).
Reproductive behaviour in our society has changed;
many women now choose to delay childbearing.
According to UK census data the number of babies born
to mothers aged 35 years or more doubled between 1985
and 2001—from 8% to 16% of total births. Although no
comparable fi gures are available for miscarriages, it is
logical to conclude that the rate of miscarriage has also
increased. A large prospective register linkage study has
shown that maternal age at conception is a strong,
independent risk factor for miscarriage,12 due to an
increase in chromosomally abnormal conceptions
(fi gure 3).4,19 The risk of fetal loss increases steeply after
the age of 35 years, rising from 9% at 20–24 years to 75%
at 45 years and older (table 2).12 The chance of a successful
pregnancy in women aged 40 years or more is poor, with
risks of miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, or stillbirth
becoming much higher than in women in their 30s.12
Reproductive history is an independent predictor of
future pregnancy outcome. Primigravidae and women
with a history of livebirths have a lower risk of miscarriage
in their next pregnancy than women whose most recent
pregnancy ended in miscarriage.10 However, women who
have had previous livebirths are not precluded from
recurrent miscarriage.16,17 Both
prospective10,12 studies have shown that the risk of a
further miscarriage increases after each successive
pregnancy loss, reaching 45% after three consecutive
pregnancy losses. The increased risk is partly explained
by the fact that women who miscarry tend to embark on
subsequent pregnancies at progressively later ages.
Most investigations into the eff ects of environmental
exposure on pregnancy have concentrated on the rate of
sporadic miscarriage rather than recurrent miscarriage.
The results are confl icting—biased by diffi culties in
controlling for confounding factors and the lack of accurate
Lancet 2006; 368: 601–11
Department of Obstetrics and
Gynaecology, St Mary’s
Campus, Imperial College
London, Mint Wing, South
Wharf Road, London W2 1PG,
UK (R Rai MD, Prof L Regan MD)
Prof Lesley Regan
Search strategy and selection criteria
We searched the Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2006), MEDLINE
(1990– March 2006), and EMBASE (1990–March 2006) with
the search terms: “miscarriage”, “recurrent miscarriage”,
“abortion” or “recurrent abortion”, alone and in combination
with “epidemiology”, “diagnosis”, “treatment”,
“immunology”, “reproductive immunology”, “assisted
conception”, “IVF”, “progesterone”, “aspirin”, “heparin”,
“steroids”, “IVIG”, and “intravenous immunoglobulin”. We
searched the reference lists of articles identifi ed by this search
for further studies. Only articles published in English were
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006
data on exposure or toxin dose. However, some
environmental factors have been shown to aff ect pregnancy
outcomes. Cigarette smoking has an adverse eff ect on
trophoblast function and is associated with a dose-
dependent increased risk of miscarriage.20 Cocaine use
confers an independent risk of pregnancy loss.21 Alcohol
has adverse eff ects on fertility and fetal development: even
moderate consumption of 3–5 units per week has been
shown to heighten the risk of miscarriage.22 Caff eine
consumption is also associated with a dose-dependent risk
of miscarriage, which increases when intake exceeds
300 mg (three cups) of coff ee daily.23 Some types of
occupational exposure, such as working with visual display
units, do not seem to intensify the risk of miscarriage,24 but
the evidence for adverse eff ects of anaesthetic gases on
surgical workers is contradictory.25 The likelihood of
miscarriage might also rise if either non-steroidal anti-
infl ammatory drugs or some antidepressant drugs are
used during the periconceptual period.26,27 In the UK,
obesity now aff ects 20% of the female population, and
evidence suggests that obesity is a risk factor for infertility,28
miscarriage,16,29 and late pregnancy complications.30
Causes of recurrent miscarriage
Historically, recurrent miscarriage has been attributed to
either genetic, structural, infective, endocrine, immune,
or unexplained causes. Thrombophilic disorders are now
thought to play a part in the cause of recurrent pregnancy
loss, which widens the scope of investigations and
management options for recurrent miscarriage.
Fetal aneuploidy is the most important cause of
miscarriage before ten weeks’ gestation.31 At least 50–60%
of all miscarriages are associated with cytogenetic
abnormalities, the most frequent being trisomy, followed
by polyploidy and monosomy X.4,5,32,33 Most human
aneuploidies arise from errors in the fi rst meiotic division
of the oocyte, which is initiated prenatally and is not
complete until ovulation. An increased rate of sperm
chromosome abnormalities has also been reported in
couples with recurrent miscarriage,34 but only 7% of fetal
trisomies have been shown to arise from paternal meiotic
errors.35 Despite the recognised association between
advancing maternal age and fetal aneuploidy, little is
known about the underlying mechanisms. One hypothesis
is that women have a limited oocyte pool, and that
increasing age results in a relative scarcity of oocytes at
optimum stages of maturation.36 Thus women who have
lost at least one trisomic fetus have been reported to have
a diminished ovarian reserve and to enter the menopause
at an earlier age than those with no such history.37,38 Some
women with recurrent miscarriage might be more prone
to heterotrisomy—ie, recurrence of a diff erent trisomy
after a trisomic pregnancy.39 One screening study of
couples with recurrent miscarriage undergoing in-vitro
fertilisation showed that they had more abnormal embryos
than an age-matched control group with no history of
In about 4% of couples with recurrent miscarriage one
partner carries either a balanced reciprocal translocation,
in which there is an exchange of two terminal segments
from diff erent chromosomes, or a Robertsonian trans-
location, in which there is centric fusion of two acrocentric
chromosomes.16 Carriers of a balanced reciprocal trans-
location are phenotypically normal, but 50–70% of their
gametes and hence embryos are unbalanced, because of
abnormal segregation at meiosis. The reproductive risk
conferred by chromosome rearrangements is dependent
Number reaching stage
Figure 1: Number of conceptions expected to reach each stage of pregnancy1
1st trimester2nd trimester3rd trimester
Figure 2: Range of adverse pregnancy outcomes
IUGR=intrauterine growth restriction.
Number of women
Conception delays/fertility investigations
Late miscarriage (second trimester)
Stillbirth or neonatal death
Abortion for fetal abnormality
Pregnancy complicated by prematurity or fetal
Table 1: Reproductive characteristics associated with poor pregnancy
prognosis and recurrent miscarriage15
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 603
on the type of rearrangement and whether it is carried by
the woman or her male partner.41 The livebirth rate in
couples with a structural chromosome abnormality who
conceive spontaneously is higher (50–65%)42 than that
currently achieved after in-vitro fertilisation and
preimplantation genetic screening, which is 29% per
oocyte retrieval and 38% per embryo transfer.43
Transcervical embryoscopy has shown that aneuploid
embryos have disordered growth and development (such
as anencephaly and facial and limb dysplasia), and that
similar abnormalities are found in up to 18% of euploid
pregnancies ending in miscarriage.44
The frequency of congenital uterine abnormalities
(uterine septae and bicornuate uterus) in the general
population is unknown, but in women with recurrent
miscarriage it has been reported to be between 1·8% and
37·6%.45–47 This wide range refl ects diff erences in diagnostic
criteria and the imaging techniques used. A retrospective
review of patients with uncorrected abnormalities suggests
that they undergo high rates of miscarriage and preterm
delivery.45 However, the benefi ts of surgical correction
(open or hysteroscopic) on pregnancy outcome have not
yet been assessed by a randomised trial.
Uterine fi broids are present in up to 30% of women, but
their eff ect on reproductive outcome is controversial.48
Most studies report that implantation failure after in-vitro
fertilisation is linked to either intramural or submucosal
fi broids, but this fi nding could indicate publication bias.
The mechanism or mechanisms by which fi broids could
cause early pregnancy loss are unclear. Traditionally,
researchers have postulated that uterine fi broids have a
mechanical or space-occupying eff ect that impedes
embryonic implantation. The expression of HOX10, a gene
that controls diff erentiation and is involved in implantation,
has now been shown to be lower in uteri with fi broids than
in those without.49
A diagnosis of cervical incompetence, based on a
history of late miscarriage preceded by spontaneous
rupture of membranes or painless cervical dilatation, is
frequently cited as a cause of midtrimester recurrent
miscarriage.16,50 However, no objective tests can reliably
identify women with cervical weakness in the non-
pregnant state. A Cochrane review identifi ed no
conclusive evidence that prophylactic cervical cerclage
reduces the risk of recurrent midtrimester miscarriage.51
Therefore, the value of serial ultrasound assessments of
cervical shortening and the insertion of a rescue cerclage
for prevention of late miscarriage and preterm delivery
are questionable.52,53 In our experience, the success of
cerclage is determined by detailed clinical history,
treatment of coexistent thrombophilic disorders and
prophylactic antibiotics. More important is the skill and
experience of the surgeon, and their ability to bury the
suture material under the vaginal mucosa to keep
vaginal discharge to a minimum.54 Abdominal cerclage
has been advocated for selected women with previous
failed vaginal cerclage. However, a systematic review
comparing the two techniques concluded that although
abdominal cerclage might reduce perinatal death, it is
associated with a higher risk of serious operative
Infective causes of recurrent miscarriage remain
speculative. For any infective agent to be implicated, it
must be capable of persisting in the genital tract undetected
and must cause few maternal symptoms. Because
toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, herpes, and
listeria infections do not meet these criteria, routine
screening for these diseases has now been abandoned.56
The evidence for bacterial vaginosis as a cause of early
miscarriage secondary to endometritis is inconsistent,57,58
but the presence of bacterial vaginosis during the fi rst
trimester of pregnancy has been repeatedly reported as a
risk factor for late miscarriage and early preterm birth.59
One randomised controlled trial in a low-risk obstetric
population showed that the risk of late miscarriage and
preterm birth is reduced by screening women for bacterial
vaginosis in early pregnancy and treating with oral
clindamycin.60 However, investigators in no less than eight
randomised trials concluded that there is no benefi t in
screening and treating all pregnant women for bacterial
vaginosis to prevent preterm birth. By contrast, the
Cochrane review suggested that detection and treatment of
bacterial vaginosis early in pregnancy might prevent
preterm delivery in women with a history of preterm
Figure 3: Proportion of miscarriages due to fetal aneuploidy by maternal age
Age (years) Total number of pregnanciesMiscarriage rate
Table 2: Miscarriage rates stratifi ed by maternal age at conception11
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006
Endocrine disturbances have been postulated to cause
recurrent miscarriage, but few reports withstand scrutiny.
Well controlled diabetes is not a risk factor for recurrent
miscarriage.62,63 A meta-analysis reported an association
between the presence of thyroid autoantibodies, a history
of one or two miscarriages, and the outcome of the next
pregnancy.64 However, no association is found if analysis
is restricted to those with recurrent miscarriage.64,65
Prolactin has a role in both ovulation and endometrial
maturation. Hyperprolactinaemia is reported to cause
recurrent miscarriage, and treatment with bromocriptene,
which suppresses prolactin secretion by the anterior
pituitary, signifi cantly reduces the rate of miscarriage.66
Lack of expression of endometrial prolactin during the
luteal phase of the menstrual cycle has also been associated
with recurrent miscarriage.67
Possible links between polycystic ovaries, the various
endocrinopathies associated with polycystic ovarian
syndrome, and recurrent miscarriage have been
investigated for the past three decades. The prevalence of
polycystic ovaries is signifi cantly higher in women with
recurrent miscarriage (40%) than in women with an
uncomplicated reproductive history (22%).68 However,
ovarian morphology per se is not predictive of the outcome
of future pregnancies without treatment.68 A placebo-
controlled randomised controlled trial reported that
suppression of high endogenous luteinising hormone
does not improve the rate of livebirths.69
Attention is now focused on the connection between
polycystic ovarian syndrome, insulin resistance, and
pregnancy loss. Insulin resistance is common in women
with recurrent miscarriage, and has been associated with
an increased rate of miscarriage.70,71 The mechanism might
include impairment of the fi brinolytic response, which is
important in the tissue remodelling that accompanies
embryonic implantation.72 Plasma concentrations of fi brin
are aff ected by the 4G/5G polymorphism in the
plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI1) gene promoter.
Homozygosity for the 4G/4G polymorphism, which is
associated with hypofi brinolysis, is recorded signifi cantly
more often in women with polycystic ovaries and a history
of recurrent miscarriage than in women with normal
ovarian morphology.73 The fact that there is an insulin
response element in the promoter region of the PAI-1 gene
lends support to the hypothesis that hyperinsulinaemia is
associated with impairment of fi brinoylyis, which in turn
is associated with miscarriage.
From a traditional immunological perspective, survival
of the semiallogenic fetus is dependent on suppression
of the maternal immune response. However, although
lymphocyte function changes during pregnancy, no
generalised suppression of the maternal immune
response has been recorded. Indeed, randomised
therapeutic studies have refuted the usefulness of the
concept of immunising a mother (eg, with paternal
white blood cells) to prevent rejection of her genetically
dissimilar fetus.74,75 The contemporary understanding of
interaction between the maternal immune system and
fetal antigens.76 Interest centres on the link between
natural killer cells and reproductive failure. Natural
killer cells are lymphocytes, and are part of the innate
immune system. Peripheral blood and the uterine
mucosa each contain natural killer cells, but the cells
have important phenotypic and functional diff erences
in each location.77
The temporal and spatial distribution of natural killer
cells in the uterine mucosa suggests they contribute to
control of trophoblast invasion. Women with recurrent
miscarriage have more natural killer cells in their uterine
mucosa than controls and those with the highest levels
have a correspondingly high rate of miscarriage in
subsequent pregnancies without treatment.78–80 No
association between the levels of natural killer cells in
peripheral blood and in the uterine mucosa has been
recorded, and levels of natural killer cells in peripheral
blood are not predictive of pregnancy outcome in women
with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. Therefore, the
value of testing women with recurrent miscarriage for
levels of natural killer cells in peripheral blood is therefore
Natural killer cells in uterine mucosa contribute to the
cytokine response at the maternal-fetal interface. This
cytokine response is generally characterised either as a
T-helper-1 (Th-1) type (with production of interleukin 2,
interferon, and tumour necrosis factor α [TNFα]) or a
T-helper-2 (Th-2) type (with interleukins 4, 6, and 10).
Normal pregnancy might be the result of a Th-2 type
cytokine response, in which blocking antibodies mask fetal
trophoblast antigens from immunological recognition by a
maternal Th-1 cell-mediated cytotoxic response.82 By
contrast, women with recurrent miscarriage tend to
produce a predominantly Th-1 type response both in the
period of embryonic implantation and during pregnancy.83–86
These fi ndings support the view that disturbances of the
immune tolerance of the fetus could contribute to recurrent
miscarriage. We need to investigate (1) the subgroup of
women with recurrent miscarriage who produce a
dominant Th-1 cytokine profi le at the maternal-fetal
interface during pregnancy and (2) immunomodulatory
interventions designed to promote Th-2 dominance.
Some studies show high levels of various autoantibodies
in women with recurrent miscarriage,87,88 but this
association has not been conclusively proved. Prospective
data on pregnancy outcomes for women with or without
autoantibodies are also confl icting—but most studies
suggest there is no association.65,89–92 One placebo-controlled
randomised study showed that the use of steroids to
suppress autoantibody titres does not improve the livebirth
rate, and moreover can increase the risk of preterm
posits a cooperative
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 605
Antiphospholipid syndrome is the most important
treatable cause of recurrent miscarriage. Anti phospho-
lipid antibodies are a family of about 20 anti bodies that
are directed against phospholipid binding plasma
proteins. They include lupus anticoagulant and anti-
cardiolipin antibodies. Antiphospholipid syndrome was
originally defi ned as the association between anti-
phospholipid antibodies and either recurrent mis-
carriage, thrombosis, or thrombocytopenia.94 The clinical
criteria now used to diagnose antiphospholipid syn-
drome are shown in the panel.95 The prevalence of
antiphospholipid syndrome in women with recurrent
miscarriage is 15%;96,97 women with the syndrome have a
miscarriage rate of 90% in subsequent untreated
pregnancies.98 Various treatments—including aspirin,
steroids, intravenous immunoglobulin and heparin—
have been used in attempts to improve the pregnancy
outcome of women with antiphospholipid syndrome.
However, a meta-analysis shows that only a combination
of heparin and aspirin can signifi cantly improve the
livebirth rate in women with recurrent miscarriage and
antiphospholipid syndrome (fi gure 4).99 This treatment
enhances pregnancy outcome by 54%, to achieve a
livebirth rate of over 70% in women with the
syndrome.100,101 Although one trial did not show a benefi t
in adding heparin to aspirin,102 it included several
women with low positive titres for anticardiolipin
antibodies, who were randomly assigned to treatment
at a late stage when pregnancy outcome was more likely
to be successful. Furthermore, nearly 25% of participants
in this study switched treatment groups. Traditionally,
pregnancy loss associated with antiphospholipid
antibodies has been ascribed to thrombosis and
infarction of the uteroplacental vasculature.103–105
However these fi ndings are neither universal nor
specifi c to antiphospholipid syndrome,106,107 and have
been challenged by advances in our understanding of
early pregnancy development and the biology of
antiphospholipid antibodies. In-vitro studies show that
antiphospholipid antibodies interfere with the signal
transduction mechanisms controlling endometrial cell
decidualisation;108 promote trophoblast apoptosis;109
decrease trophoblast fusion;109–112 and impair trophoblast
invasion.107,113 The eff ects of antiphospholipid antibodies
on trophoblast function are reversed in vitro by low-
Pregnancy is a hypercoaguable state.117,118 The evolutionary
advantage of such a change in haemostasis is to
counteract the inherent instability associated with
haemochorial placentation, which is unique to human
beings. The fi rst studies of the prevalence of coagulation
abnormalities in women with a history of adverse
pregnancy outcome appeared in the mid-1990s.119,120
Three common thrombophilic mutations were identifi ed:
Factor V (Leiden) G1691A; factor II (prothrombin)
G20210A and methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase
C677T. Since then, many publications have reported that
individual coagulation defects are either as frequent or
more frequent in women with recurrent miscarriage
than they are in controls.
Data on the frequency of genetic thrombophilia are
compromised by the small size of individual studies,
stratifi cation bias and poor matching of cases and
controls due to racial heterogeneity. Nonetheless, two
meta-analyses have confi rmed an association between
recurrent miscarriage and gene mutations in Factor
V Leiden and prothrombin.121,122 There are few prospective
data on the outcome of untreated pregnancies in women
with genetic thrombophilic defects. The largest
published study of 19 women with unexplained fi rst
trimester recurrent miscarriage, who were heterozygous
for the Factor V Leiden mutation, showed that they had
a signifi cantly lower rate of livebirth (37·5%) than a
control group of 100 women with recurrent miscarriage,
who had the normal Factor V genotype (69·5%; odds
ratio 3·75, 95% CI 1·3–10·9).123 However, women with
the Factor V Leiden mutation were not precluded from
having an uncomplicated
Additional comorbid disorders probably diff erentiate
between these outcomes, and multiple risk factors
increase the likelihood of adverse pregnancy outcomes
in carriers of weakly prothrombotic genotypes.124 Indeed
one European cohort study identifi ed a 14-fold increased
Panel: Criteria for diagnosis of antiphospholipid
● Three or more consecutive unexplained miscarriages
before 10th week of gestation
● One or more unexplained deaths of a morphologically
normal fetus at 10 weeks’ gestation or older
● One or more premature births of a morphologically
normal fetus at 34 weeks’ gestation or younger associated
with severe pre-eclampsia or placental insuffi ciency
0 1·01·0 2·0 3·04·0
vs aspirin or placebo
Aspirin vs placebo
or usual care
Figure 4: Meta-analysis of treatments for pregnancy loss associated with
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006
risk of stillbirth in patients with combined thrombophilic
Since individual genetic thrombophilic defects have
little value in predicting pregnancy outcome, so-called
global markers of haemostatic function are used to
assess women with recurrent miscarriage. These tests
have shown that women with recurrent miscarriage are
in a prothrombotic state outside of pregnancy.125–128
Research suggests that the prothrombotic state not only
results in an exaggerated haemostatic response during
pregnancy, leading to thrombosis of the uteroplacental
vasculature and subsequent fetal loss,119,129,130 but also
confers a risk of ischaemic heart disease in later life.131
In-vitro studies in mice suggest that thrombosis is
not the only mechanism for reproductive failure in
women with thrombophilic defects. Murine trophoblast
cells express many glycoproteins that promote (tissue
factor) and inhibit (thrombomodulin) coagulation.
Isermann and colleagues132 reported that fetal loss in
thrombomodulin-defi cient embryos is caused by tissue-
factor-initiated activation of the blood coagulation
cascade at the fetomaternal interface. The blood
coagulation cascade leads to excess generation of
thrombin, which then (a) signals through protease-
activated receptors to promote trophoblast apoptosis
and (b) stimulates production of fi brinogen split
products which also accelerate apoptosis of the
In about two-thirds of fi rst trimester miscarriages
there is histological evidence of premature onset of
maternal blood fl ow into the intervillous space
throughout the placenta.133,134 This blood fl ow leads to a
state of oxidative stress which is associated with
trophoblast apoptosis. This fi nding is independent of
the fetal karyotype.135–137 Some cases of recurrent
miscarriage are associated with defi ciencies in either
glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase or nitric oxide
synthase, which are enzymes involved in the metabolism
of reactive oxygen species.138–140
Management options and therapeutic
The treatment of couples with recurrent miscarriage has
traditionally been based on anecdotal evidence, personal
bias, and the results of small uncontrolled studies.141 As our
knowledge of early pregnancy development increases, it is
incumbent on us to embrace evidence-based practice. Data
on which to base such practice is being generated by newly
established clinics, dedicated to recurrent miscarriage,
which are able to recruit patients to clinical trials of
suffi cient power to establish how well a treatment works in
a trial setting. These clinics aim to identify an underlying
cause of recurrent miscarriage, to conduct prospective
randomised controlled trials of suffi cient power to
determine the best possible treatment regimens, and to
avoid use of treatments with no proven benefi t. Our
investigative protocol for assessing couples with recurrent
miscarriage is shown in table 3. When assessing the
eff ectiveness of any intervention, it is important to
recognise that at least 35% of couples with a history of
three consecutive miscarriages have lost pregnancies
purely by chance alone, secondary to sporadic fetal
aneuploidy. Such couples have a 75% chance of a successful
pregnancy next time with no therapeutic intervention
responses, such as anxiety, depression, denial, anger,
marital disruption, and a sense of loss and inadequacy.
Various psychosocial factors infl uence the immune
system, and it has been proposed that a so-called
miscarriage.142 Certainly, stress induces miscarriage in
mice,143 and raised levels of CD8+ T cells, TNFα and
tryptase-positive mast cells have been reported in the
endometriums of women with sporadic miscarriage and
can induce pronounced emotional
is involved in
Parental peripheral blood karyotype
Early follicular-phase follicule stimulating hormone
Pelvic ultrasound scan
Antiphospholipid antibodies (lupus anticoagulant+IgG and IgM anticardiolipin antibodies)
4% of couples have an abnormal karyotype. Make a referral for genetic counselling
Assessment of ovarian reserve
To determine uterine anatomy and ovarian morphology
15% of women have antiphospholipid syndrome. Treatment with aspirin+heparin signifi cantly
improves livebirth rate
Associated with recurrent miscarriage. Thromboprophylaxis reported to improve outcome
Associated with recurrent miscarriage. Thromboprophylaxis reported to improve outcome
Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene mutations
Global assessment of haemostasis activated protein C resistance and thromboelastography
Table 3: Protocol for investigation of recurrent miscarriage
Level of evidence References
Intervention of benefi t
Aspirin+heparin for antiphospholipid syndrome
Metformin for women with insulin resistance
Heparin for women with thrombophilic defects
Intervention of no benefi t
Progesterone supplementation after positive pregnancy test
Aspirin for “unexplained” reccurent miscarriage
Embryo aneuploidy screening
Table 4: Evidence level for given intervention in management of recurrent miscarriage
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 607
a high stress score.139 Moreover, a signifi cant association
between baseline depressive symptoms and subsequent
miscarriage has been identifi ed.144,145 Several non-
randomised studies have reported that psychological
support in early pregnancy decreases the miscarriage rate
in women with so-called unexplained mis carriage.146–148
Progesterone is secreted mainly by the corpus luteum,
which is formed in the ovary after rupture of an ovarian
follicle at the time of ovulation. Because progesterone
induces secretory changes in the endometrium which
are essential for implantation of the embryo, it has been
suggested that some cases of miscarriage might be due
to inadequate secretion of progesterone, either in the
postovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle or in early
pregnancy. Hence progestational agents have been used,
beginning in the early fi rst trimester of pregnancy, in an
attempt to prevent miscarriage. Two meta-analyses of the
use of progesterone showed that it did not reduce the
miscarriage rate for women with sporadic miscarriage.149,150
However, a subgroup analysis of women with recurrent
miscarriage suggests that progesterone use in the fi rst
trimester might be of benefi t.150,151 This could be explained
by progesterone’s immunomodulatory actions in shifting
the proinfl ammatory Th-1 cytokine response to a more
favourable Th-2 response.152
Insulin-sensitising agents, such as metformin, have
been reported to reduce hyperinsulinaemia, reverse the
endocrinopathy of polycystic ovarian syndrome, and
normalise endocrine, metabolic, and reproductive
function. Small retrospective studies show that use of
metformin during pregnancy is associated with a
reduction in the miscarriage rate in women with
polycystic ovarian syndrome.153,154 However, the eff ect of
metformin remains to be tested in a large, prospective,
placebo-controlled study of a well defi ned cohort of
women with recurrent miscarriage.
Aspirin off ers a thromboprophylactic eff ect by inhibiting
platelet aggregation. But two studies have reported that
aspirin does not improve the livebirth rate in women
with unexplained recurrent miscarriage.155,156 Although
the use of aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-
infl ammatory agents prior to conception has been
associated with a high miscarriage rate,26,157 these studies
were method ologically weak—one investigated fewer
than 20 pregnancies.153 Both a case-controlled study158 and
a meta-analysis159 have reported a two-fold to three-fold
increased risk of fetal gastroschisis in mothers taking
aspirin during the fi rst trimester of pregnancy, further
emphasising the dangers of empirical therapy for women
with recurrent miscarriage. Aspirin has not yet been
demonstrated to be benefi cial for women in whom a
thrombophilic defect has been identi fi ed as the cause of
their pregnancy failures.
Heparin, and the structurally related heparin sulphate,
are typically classed as thromboprophylactic agents, but
have other properties which act at the fetomaternal
interface. Heparin can bind to antiphospholipid
antibodies and can also antagonise the action of the Th-
1 cytokine interferon gamma, thereby protecting the
trophoblast and maternal vascular endothelium from
damage in early pregnancy. Later in pregnancy, when
the intervillous circulation has been established, heparin
helps to ameliorate the risk of placental fi brin deposition,
thrombosis, and infarction. A prospective placebo-
controlled study would be needed to establish the
effi cacy of heparin in the treatment of women with
recurrent miscarriage of unknown cause.160
Some women with recurrent miscarriage are being given
intravenous immunoglobulin, anti-TNFα drugs, and
glucocorticoids to dampen a so-called excessive immune
response. These interventions are not based on evidence,
and furthermore could potentially cause morbidity.161
Intravenous immunoglobulin is a pooled-blood product
and is associated with anaphylactic response, fever,
fl ushing, muscle pains, nausea, and headache.162 Anti-
TNFα agents have been linked with the development of
lymphoma, granulomatous diseases such as tuberculosis,
demyelinating disease, congestive cardiac failure, and
syndromes similar to systemic lupus erythematosus.163
Although TNFα is viewed mainly as a cytokine, and as a
trigger for a maternal immune response to fetal antigens,
it has other roles in antiapoptotic signalling pathways
and regulation of cell proliferation. Studies in TNFα
knock-out mice also suggest that TNFα might aff ect
embryo development and help to prevent structural
abnormalities (which might not become apparent until
later infant life).164 Glucocorticoids during pregnancy are
associated with a risk of preterm delivery secondary to
rupture of membranes and the development of pre-
eclampsia and gestational diabetes.93
Embryo aneuploidy screening
Aneuploidy is the most common cause of miscarriage.
In-vitro fertilisation allows preimplantation embryos to
be screened for aneuploidy, using fl uorescent in-situ
hybridisation. Although the embryo aneuploidy rate is
higher in women with recurrent miscarriage than in age-
matched controls,40 aneuploidy screening and the
replacement of chromosomally normal embryos does
not improve the rate of livebirths.165 Moreover, women
with recurrent miscarriage aged less than 37 years only
had a 26% livebirth rate after in-vitro fertilisation and
aneuploidy screening. By contrast, after spontaneous
conception the livebirth rate is 75%.17,18,147
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006
Maternal age at conception and previous reproductive
history are strong and independent risk factors for
miscarriage. The chance of a successful pregancy in a
woman aged 40 years or more is poor. The demonstration
that some women with recurrent miscarriage are in a
prothrombotic state outside of pregnancy has
emphasised the role of haemostatic pathways in early
pregnancy development and the value of anticoagulant
treatment in the management of recurrent miscarriage.
Advances in reproductive immunology, endocrinology,
and genetics have enabled a more multidisciplinary
approach to studying and treating couples with
recurrent miscarriage. The high chance of a successful
pregnancy in couples with no identifi able cause for
recurrent miscarriage coupled with the paucity of data
from randomised trials mean that clinicians should
resist the use of empirical treatments which might
deliver no benefi t or might even cause harm. Instead,
patients with recurrent miscarriage should be recruited
to adequately powered placebo-controlled studies,
especially as the value of psychological support in
improving pregnancy outcome has been shown in
Confl ict of interest statement
We declare that we have no confl ict of interest.
1 Kline, J. Conception to birth—epidemiology of prenatal development.
Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford, Oxford
University Press. 1989.
2 Wilcox AJ, Weinberg CR, O’Connor JF, et al. Incidence of early loss
of pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 189–94.
3 Chard T. Frequency of implantation and early pregnancy loss in
natural cycles. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 5: 179–89.
4 Stirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1990; 336: 673–75.
5 Stephenson MD, Awartani KA, Robinson WP. Cytogenetic analysis
of miscarriages from couples with recurrent miscarriage: a case-
control study. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 446–51.
6 Greenwold N, Jauniaux E. Collection of villous tissue under
ultrasound guidance to improve the cytogenetic study of early
pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 452–56.
7 Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical causes of miscarriage.
Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 14: 839–54.
8 Hogge WA, Byrnes AL, Lanasa MC, Surti U. The clinical use of
karyotyping spontaneous abortions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189:
9 Risch HA, Weiss NS, Clarke EA, Miller AB. Risk factors for
spontaneous abortion and its recurrence. Am J Epidemiol 1988; 128:
10 Regan L, Braude PR, Trembath PL. Infl uence of past reproductive
performance on risk of spontaneous abortion. BMJ 1989; 299:
11 Knudsen UB, Hansen V, Juul S, Secher NJ. Prognosis of a new
pregnancy following previous spontaneous abortions.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 39: 31–36.
12 Nybo Andersen AM, Wohlfahrt J, Christens P, Olsen J, Melbye M.
Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study.
BMJ 2000; 320: 1708–12.
13 Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. BMJ 1991; 302: 543–44
14 Sullivan AE, Silver RM, LaCoursiere DY, Porter TF, Branch DW.
Recurrent fetal aneuploidy and recurrent miscarriage. Obstet Gynecol
2004; 104: 784–88.
15 Strobino B, Fox HE, Kline J, et al. Characteristics of women with
recurrent spontaneous abortions and women with favourable
reproductive histories. Am J Public Health 1986; 76: 986–91
16 Cliff ord K, Rai R, Watson H, Regan L. An informative protocol for
the investigation of recurrent miscarriage: preliminary experience
of 500 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1328–32.
17 Brigham SA, Conlon C, Farquharson RG. A longitudinal study of
pregnancy outcome following idiopathic recurrent miscarriage.
Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2868–71.
18 Jivraj S, Anstie B, Cheong YC, Fairlie FM, Laird S, Li TC. Obstetric
and neonatal outcome in women with a history of recurrent
miscarriage: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 102–06
19 Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal age-specifi c rates of numerical
chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy.
Hum Genet 1985; 70: 11–17.
20 Lindbohm ML, Sallmen M, Taskinen H. Eff ects of exposure to
environmental tobacco smoke on reproductive health.
Scand J Work Environ Health 2002; 28 (suppl 2): 84–96.
21 Ness RB, Grisso JA, Hirshinger N, et al. Cocaine and tobacco use
and the risk of spontaneous abortion. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:
22 Kesmodel U, Wisborg K, Olsen SF, et al. Moderate alcohol intake
in pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion. Alcohol Alcohol
2002; 37: 435–44.
23 Rasch V. Cigarette, alcohol and caff eine consumption: Risk factors for
spontaneous abortion. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 182–88.
24 Marcus M, McChesney R, Golden A, Landrigan P. Video display
terminals and miscarriage. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2000; 55: 84–88.
25 McGregor DG. Occupational exposure to trace concentrations of
waste anaesthetic gases. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 273–77.
26 Nielsen GL, Sorensen HT, Larsen H, Pedersen L. Risk of adverse
birth outcome and miscarriage in pregnant users of non-steroidal
anti-infl ammatory drugs: population based observational study
and case-control study. BMJ 2001; 322: 266–70.
27 Hemels M, Einarson A, Koren G, Lanctot K, Einarson T.
Antidepressant use during pregnancy and the rates of spontaneous
abortions: a meta analysis. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 803–09.
28 Wang JX, Davies MJ, Norman RJ. Polycystic ovarian syndrome and
the risk of spontaneous abortion following assisted reproductive
technology treatment. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 2606–09.
29 Lashen H, Fear K, Sturdee DW. Obesity is associated with
increased risk of fi rst trimester and recurrent miscarriage:
matched case-control study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1644–46.
30 Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and
pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London.
Int J Obes 2001; 25: 1175–82.
31 Jacobs PA, Hassold TJ. Chromosome abnormalities: origin and
etiology in abortions and live births. In: Vogal F and Sperling K,
eds. Human genetics. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1987: 233–44.
32 Kalousek DK, Pantzar T, Tsai M, Paradice B. Early spontaneous
abortion: morphologic and karyotypic fi ndings in 3912 cases.
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser 1993; 29: 53–61.
33 Fritz B, Hallermann C, Olert J, et al. Cytogenetic analyses of
culture failures by comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH)–
Re-evaluation of chromosome aberration rates in early
spontaneous abortions. Eur J Hum Genet 2001; 9: 539–47.
34 Giorlandino C, Calugi G, Iaconianni L, Santoro ML, Lippa A.
Spermatazoa with chromosomal abnormalities may result in a
higher rate of recurrent abortion. Fertil Steril 1998; 70: 576–77.
35 Robinson WP, Bernasconi F, Lau A, McFadden DE. Frequency of
meiotic trisomy depends on involved chromosome and mode of
ascertainment. Am J Med Genet 1999; 84: 34–42.
36 Warburton D. The eff ect of maternal age on the frequency
of trisomy: change in meiosis or in utero selection?
Prog Clin Biol Res 1989; 311: 165–81.
37 Freeman SB, Yang Q, Allran K, Taft LF, Sherman SL. Women with
a reduced ovarian complement may have an increased risk for a
child with Down syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 66: 1680–83.
38 Kline J, Kinney A, Levin B, Warburton D. Trisomic pregnancy and
earlier age at menopause. Am J Hum Genet 2000; 67: 395–404.
39 Warburton D, Dallaire L, Thangavelu M, Ross L, Levin B, Kline J.
Trisomy recurrence: a reconsideration based on North American
data. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 75: 376–85.
40 Rubio C, Simon C, Vidal F, et al. Chromosomal abnormalities and
embryo development in recurrent miscarriage couples.
Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 182–88.
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 609
41 Munne S, Escudero T, Sandalinas M, Sable D, Cohen J. Gamete
segregation in female carriers of Robertsonian translocations.
Cytogenet Cell Genet 2000; 90: 303–08.
42 Carp H, Feldman B, Oelsner G, Schiff E. Parental karyotype and
subsequent live births in recurrent miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:
43 Braude P, Pickering S, Flinter F, Ogilvie CM. Preimplantation genetic
diagnosis. Nat Rev Genet 2002; 3: 941–53.
44 Phillipp T, Phillipp K, Reiner A, Beer F, Kalousek DK. Embryoscopic
and cytogenetic analysis of 233 missed abortions: factors involved in
the pathogenesis of developmental defects of early failed
pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 1724–32.
45 Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P.
Clinical implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic
treatment results. Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7: 161–74.
46 Woelfer B, Salim R, Banerjee S, Elson J, Regan L, Jurkovic D.
Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies
detected by three-dimensional ultrasound screening. Obstet Gynecol
2001; 98: 1099–103.
47 Salim R, Regan L, Woelfer B, Backos M, Jurkovic D. A comparative
study of the morphology of congenital uterine anomalies in
women with and without a history of recurrent fi rst trimester
miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003; 18: 162–66.
48 Hart R, Khalaf Y, Yeong CT, Seed P, Taylor A, Braude P.
A prospective controlled study of the eff ect of intramural uterine
fi broids on the outcome of assisted conception. Hum Reprod 2001;
49 Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Uterine leiomyomas aff ect endometrial
HOXA10 expression. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2006; 13 (suppl 2):
50 Drakeley AJ, Quenby S, Farquharson RG. Mid-trimester loss—
appraisal of a screening approach. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1975–80.
51 Drakeley AJ, Roberts D, Alfi revic Z. Cervical stitch (cerclage) for
preventing pregnancy loss in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2003; 1: CD003253.
52 Althusius SM, Dekker GA, van Geign HP, Bekedam DJ, Hummel P.
Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial
(CIPRACT): study design and preliminary results.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 823–29.
53 Rust OA, Atlas RO, Jones KJ, Benham BN, Balducci J.
A randomized trial of cerclage versus no cerclage among patients
with ultrasonographically detected second trimester preterm
dilatation of the internal os. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:
54 Heeps A, Crouch N, Backos M, et al. Successful prevention of
second trimester pregnancy loss using high cervical cerclage.
J Soc Gyn Invest 2006; 13 (suppl 2): 812 (abstr).
55 Zaveri V, Aghajafari F, Amankwah K, Hannah M. Abdominal
versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a
systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 868–72.
56 Regan L, Jivraj S. Infection and pregnancy loss. In: MacLean A,
Regan L, Carrington D (eds). Infection and pregnancy. London:
RCOG Press, 2001: 291–304.
57 Camp JM, Rai R, Ison C, Regan L, Taylor-Robinson D. Association
of bacterial vaginosis with a history of second trimester miscarriage.
Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1575–78.
58 Ralph SG, Rutherford AJ, Wilson JD. Infl uence of bacterial vaginosis
on conception and miscarriage in the fi rst trimester: cohort study.
BMJ 1999; 319: 220–23.
59 Hay PE, Lamont RF, Taylor-Robinson D, Morgan DJ, Ison C,
Pearson J. Abnormal bacterial colonisation of the genital tract and
subsequent preterm delivery and late miscarriage. BMJ 1994; 308:
60 Ugwumade A, Manyonda I, Reid F, Hay P. Eff ect of early oral
clindamycin on late miscarriage and preterm delivery in
asymptomatic women with abnormal vaginal fl ora and bacterial
vaginosis. Lancet 2003; 361: 983–98.
61 Brocklehurst P, Hanna M, McDonald H. Interventions for treating
bacterial vaginosis in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;
62 Mills JL, Simpson JL, Driscoll SG, et al. Incidence of spontaneous
abortion among normal women and insulin-dependent diabetic
women whose pregnancies were identifi ed within 21 days of
conception. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 1617–23.
63 Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Combs CA, Khoury J, Siddiqi TA.
Glycemic thresholds for spontaneous abortion and congenital
malformations in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84: 515–20.
64 Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. Thyroid autoimmunity and
miscarriage. Eur J Endocrinol 2004; 150: 751–55.
65 Rushworth FH, Backos M, Rai R, Chilcott IT, Baxter N, Regan L.
Prospective pregnancy outcome in untreated recurrent miscarriers
with thyroid autoantibodies. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 1637–39.
66 Hirahara F, Andoh N, Sawai K, Hirabuki T, Uemura T,
Minaguchi H. Hyperprolactinemic recurrent miscarriage and
results of randomized bromocriptine treatment trials. Fertil Steril
1998; 70: 246–252.
67 Garzia E, Borgato S, Cozzi V, et al. Lack of expression of
endometrial prolactin in early pregnancy failure: pilot study.
Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1911–16.
68 Rai R, Backos M, Rushworth F, Regan L. Polycystic ovaries and
recurrent miscarriage—a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 612–15.
69 Cliff ord K, Rai R, Watson H, Franks S, Regan L. Does suppressing
luteinising hormone secretion reduce the miscarriage rate? Results
of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 1996; 312: 1508–11.
70 Craig LB, Ke RW, Kutteh WH. Increased prevalence of insulin
resistance in women with a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.
Fertil Steril 2002; 78: 487–90.
71 Glueck CJ, Awadalla SG, Phillips H, Cameron D, Wang P,
Fontaine RN. Polycystic ovary syndrome, infertility, familial
thrombophilia, familial hypofi brinolysis, recurrent loss of in vitro
fertilized embryos, and miscarriage. Fertil Steril 2000; 74: 394–97.
72 Dale PO, Tanbo T, Haug E, Abyholm T. The impact of insulin
resistance on the outcome of ovulation induction with low-dose
follicle stimulating hormone in women with polycystic ovary
syndrome. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 567–70.
73 Carrington B, Rai R, Regan L. Polycystic ovaries, insulin resistance,
hypofi brinolysis and recurrent miscarriage. J Soc Gynecol Investig
2005; 12: 20 (abstr).
74 Scott JR. Immunotherapy for recurrent miscarriage.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 1: CD000112.
75 Ober C, Karrison T, Odem RR, et al. Mononuclear-cell immunisation
in prevention of recurrent miscarriages: a randomised trial. Lancet
1999; 354: 365–69.
76 Moff ett-King A. Natural killer cells and pregnancy. Nat Rev Immunol
2002; 2: 656–63.
77 Koopman LA, Kopcow HD, Rybalov B, et al. Human decidual
natural killer cells are a unique NK cell subset with
immunomodulatory potential. J Exp Med 2003; 198: 1201–12.
78 Cliff ord K, Flanagan AM, Regan L. Endometrial CD56+ natural
killer cells in women with recurrent miscarriage:
a histomorphometric study. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2727–30.
79 Quenby S, Bates M, Doig T, et al. Pre-implantation endometrial
leukocytes in women with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 1999;
80 Lachapelle MH, Miron P, Hemmings R, Roy DC. Endometrial T, B,
and NK cells in patients with recurrent spontaneous abortion. Altered
profi le and pregnancy outcome. J Immunol. 1996; 156: 4027–34.
81 Moff ett A, Regan L, Braude P. Natural killer cells, miscarriage, and
infertility. BMJ 2004; 329: 1283–85.
82 Wegmann TG, Lin H, Guilbert L, Mosmann TR. Bidirectional
cytokine interactions in the maternal-fetal relationship: is successful
pregnancy a TH2 phenomenon? Immunol Today 1993; 14: 353–56.
83 Reinhard G, Noll A, Schlebusch H, Mallmann P, Ruecker AV.
Shifts in the TH1/TH2 balance during human pregnancy correlate
with apoptotic changes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1998; 245:
84 Von Wolff M, Thaler CJ, Strowitzki T, Broome J, Stolz W,
Tabibzadeh S. Regulated expression of cytokines in human
endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle: dysregulation in
habitual abortion. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6: 627–34.
85 Lim KJ, Odukoya OA, Ajjan RA, Li TC, Weetman AP, Cooke ID.
The role of T-helper cytokines in human reproduction. Fertil Steril
2000; 73: 136–42.
86 Raghupathy R, Makhseed M, Azizieh F, Omu A, Gupta M, Farhat R.
Cytokine production by maternal lymphocytes during normal
human pregnancy and in unexplained recurrent spontaneous
abortion. Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 713–18.
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006
87 Kaider AS, Kaider BD, Janowicz PB, Roussev RG.
Immunodiagnostic evaluation in women with reproductive
failure. Am J Reprod Immunol. 1999; 42: 335–46.
88 Kutteh WH, Yetman DL, Carr AC, Beck LA, Scott RT Jr. Increased
prevalence of antithyroid antibodies identifi ed in women with
recurrent pregnancy loss but not in women undergoing assisted
reproduction. Fertil Steril 1999; 71: 843–48.
89 Esplin MS, Branch DW, Silver R, Stagnaro-Green A. Thyroid
autoantibodies are not associated with recurrent pregnancy loss.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 179: 1583–86.
90 Kutteh WH, Schoolcraft WB, Scott RT Jr. Antithyroid antibodies
do not aff ect pregnancy outcome in women undergoing assisted
reproduction. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2886–90.
91 Malinowski A, Szpakowski M, Wilczynski J, Oszukowski P,
Puchala B, Wlodarczyk B. Antinuclear antibodies in women with
recurrent pregnancy wastage and their prognostic value for
immunotherapy. Zentralbl Gynakol 1994; 116: 631–35.
92 Harger JH, Rabin BS, Marchese SG. The prognostic value of
antinuclear antibodies in women with recurrent pregnancy losses:
a prospective controlled study. Obstet Gynecol 1989; 73: 419–24.
93 Laskin CA, Bombardier C, Hannah ME, et al. Prednisone and
aspirin in women with autoantibodies and unexplained recurrent
fetal loss. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 148–53.
94 Harris EN. Syndrome of the black swan. Br J Rheumatol 1987; 26:
95 Wilson WA, Gharavi AE, Piette JC. International classifi cation
criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: synopsis of a post-
conference workshop held at the Ninth International (Tours) aPL
Symposium. Lupus 2001; 10: 457–60.
96 Rai RS, Regan L, Cliff ord K, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies
and beta 2-glycoprotein-I in 500 women with recurrent
miscarriage: results of a comprehensive screening approach.
Hum Reprod 1995; 10: 2001–05.
97 Creagh MD, Malia RG, Cooper SM, Smith AR, Duncan SL,
Greaves M. Screening for lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin
antibodies in women with fetal loss. J Clin Pathol 1991; 44: 45–47.
98 Rai RS, Cliff ord K, Cohen H, Regan L. High prospective fetal loss
rate in untreated pregnancies of women with recurrent
miscarriage and antiphospholipid antibodies. Hum Reprod 1995;
99 Empson M, Lassere M, Craig JC, Scott JR. Recurrent pregnancy
loss with antiphospholipid antibody: a systematic review of
therapeutic trials. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 135–44.
100 Kutteh WH. Antiphospholipid antibody-associated recurrent
pregnancy loss: treatment with heparin and low-dose aspirin is
superior to low-dose aspirin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174:
101 Rai R, Cohen H, Dave M, Regan L. Randomised controlled trial of
aspirin and aspirin plus heparin in pregnant women with
recurrent miscarriage associated with phospholipid antibodies
(or antiphospholipid antibodies). BMJ 1997; 314: 253–57.
102 Farquharson R, Quenby S, Greaves M. Antiphospholipid
syndrome in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial of
treatment. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 100: 408–13.
103 De Wolf F, Carreras LO, Moerman P, Vermylen J, Van Assche A,
Renaer M. Decidual vasculopathy and extensive placental
infarction in a patient with repeated thromboembolic accidents,
recurrent fetal loss, and a lupus anticoagulant.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982; 142: 829–34.
104 Sebire NJ, Backos M, Goldin RD, Regan L. Placental massive
perivillous fi brin deposition associated with antiphospholipid
antibody syndrome. BJOG 2002; 109: 570–73.
105 Out HJ, Kooijman CD, Bruinse HW, Derksen RH.
Histopathological fi ndings in placentae from patients with intra-
uterine fetal death and anti-phospholipid antibodies.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 41: 179–86.
106 Van Horn JT, Craven C, Ward K, Branch DW, Silver RM.
Histologic features of placentas and abortion specimens from
women with antiphospholipid and antiphospholipid-like
syndromes. Placenta 2004; 25: 642–48.
107 Sebire NJ, Backos M, El Gaddal S, Goldin RD, Regan L. Placental
pathology, antiphospholipid antibodies, and pregnancy outcome
in recurrent miscarriage patients. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:
108 Mak IY, Brosens JJ, Christian M, et al. Regulated expression of
signal transducer and activator of transcription, Stat5, and its
enhancement of PRL expression in human endometrial stromal
cells in vitro. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 2581–88.
109 Bose P, Black S, Kadyrov M, et al. Heparin and aspirin attenuate
placental apoptosis in vitro: implications for early pregnancy failure.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 23–30.
110 Lyden TW, Vogt E, Ng AK, Johnson PM, Rote NS. Monoclonal
antiphospholipid antibody reactivity against human placental
trophoblast. J Reprod Immunol 1992; 22: 1–14.
111 Di Simone N, Castellani R, Caliandro D, Caruso A. Antiphospholid
antibodies regulate the expression of trophoblast cell adhesion
molecules. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 805–11.
112 Di Simone N, De Carolis S, Lanzone A, Ronsisvalle E, Giannice R,
Caruso A. In vitro eff ect of antiphospholipid antibody-containing
sera on basal and gonadotrophin releasing hormone-dependent
human chorionic gonadotrophin release by cultured trophoblast
cells. Placenta 1995; 16: 75–83.
113 Bose P, Black S, Kadyrov M, et al. Adverse eff ects of lupus
anticoagulant positive blood sera on placental viability can be
prevented by heparin in vitro. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 2125–31.
114 Quenby S, Mountfi eld S, Cartwright JE, Whitley GS, Vince G.
Eff ects of low-molecular-weight and unfractionated heparin on
trophoblast function. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 104: 354–61.
115 Di Simone N, Caliandro D, Castellani R, Ferrazzani S, De Carolis S,
Caruso A. Low-molecular weight heparin restores in-vitro trophoblast
invasiveness and diff erentiation in presence of immunoglobulin G
fractions obtained from patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.
Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 489–95.
116 Di Simone N, Ferrazzani S, Castellani R, De Carolis S, Mancuso S,
Caruso A. Heparin and low-dose aspirin restore placental human
chorionic gonadotrophin secretion abolished by antiphospholipid
antibody-containing sera. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 2061–65.
117 Stirling Y, Woolf L, North WR, Seghatchian MJ, Meade TW.
Haemostasis in normal pregnancy. Thromb Haemost 1984; 52: 176–82.
118 Hellgren M. Hemostasis during pregnancy and puerperium.
Haemostasis 1996; 26 (suppl 4): 244–47.
119 Preston FE, Rosendaal FR, Walker ID, et al. Increased fetal loss in
women with heritable thrombophilia. Lancet 1996; 348: 913–16.
120 Sanson BJ, Friederich PW, Simioni P, et al. The risk of abortion and
stillbirth in antithrombin-, protein C-, and protein S-defi cient
women. Thromb Haemost 1996; 75: 387–88.
121 Kovalevsky G, Gracia CR, Berlin JA, Sammel MD, Barnhart KT.
Evaluation of the association between hereditary thrombophilias
and recurrent pregnancy loss: a meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med
2004; 164: 558–63.
122 Rey E, Kahn SR, David M, Shrier I. Thrombophilic disorders and
fetal loss: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2003; 361: 901–08.
123 Rai R, Backos M, Elgaddal S, Shlebak A, Regan L. Factor V Leiden
and recurrent miscarriage—Prospective outcome of untreated
pregnancies. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 402–05.
124 Jivraj S, Rai R, Underwood J, Regan L. Genetic thrombophilic
mutations among couples with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod
2006: 21: 1161–65.
125 Carp H, Dardik R, Lubetsky A, et al. Prevalence of circulating
procoagulant microparticles in women with recurrent miscarriage:
a case-controlled study. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 191–95.
126 Laude I, Rongieres-Bertrand C, Boyer-Neumann C, et al. Circulating
procoagulant microparticles in women with unexplained pregnancy
loss: a new insight. Thromb Haemost 2001; 85: 18–21.
127 Rai R, Tuddenham E, Backos M, et al. Thromboelastography, whole-
blood haemostasis and recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2003;
128 Vincent T, Rai R, Regan L, Cohen H. Increased thrombin generation
in women with recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1998; 352: 116.
129 Rai R, Shlebak A, Cohen H, et al. Factor V Leiden and acquired
activated protein C resistance among 1000 women with recurrent
miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 961–65.
130 Dizon-Townson DS, Meline L, Nelson LM, Varner M, Ward K. Fetal
carriers of the factor V Leiden mutation are prone to miscarriage
and placental infarction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 402–05.
131 Smith GC, Pell JP, Walsh D. Spontaneous loss of early pregnancy
and risk of ischaemic heart disease in later life: retrospective cohort
study. BMJ 2003; 326: 423–24.
www.thelancet.com Vol 368 August 12, 2006 611
132 Isermann B, Sood R, Pawlinski R, et al. The thrombomodulin-
protein C system is essential for the maintenance of pregnancy.
Nat Med 2003; 9: 331–37.
133 Hempstock J, Jauniaux E, Greenwold N, Burton GJ. The
contribution of placental oxidative stress to early pregnancy failure.
Hum Pathol 2003; 34: 1265–75.
134 Jauniaux E, Greenwold N, Hempstock J, Burton GJ. Comparison of
ultrasonographic and Doppler mapping of the intervillous
circulation in normal and abnormal early pregnancies. Fertil Steril
2003; 79: 100–06.
135 Hustin J, Jauniaux E, Schaaps JP. Histological study of the materno-
embryonic interface in spontaneous abortion. Placenta 1990; 11:
136 Sebire NJ, Fox H, Backos M, Rai R, Paterson C, Regan L. Defective
endovascular trophoblast invasion in primary antiphospholipid
antibody syndrome-associated early pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod
2002; 17: 1067–71.
137 Greenwold N, Jauniaux E, Gulbis B, Hempstock J, Gervy C,
Burton GJ. Relationship among maternal serum endocrinology,
placental karyotype, and intervillous circulation in early pregnancy
failure. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 1373–79.
138 Jenkins C, Wilson R, Roberts J, Miller H, McKillop JH, Walker JJ.
Antioxidants: their role in pregnancy and miscarriage.
Antioxid Redox Signal 2000; 2: 623–28.
139 Nicol CJ, Zielenski J, Tsui LC, Wells PG. An embryoprotective role
for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in developmental oxidative
stress and chemical teratogenesis. FASEB J 2000; 14: 111–27.
140 Tempfer C, Unfried G, Zeillinger R, Hefl er L, Nagele F, Huber JC.
Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism in women
with idiopathic recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:
141 Rai R, Cliff ord K, Regan L. The modern preventative treatment of
recurrent miscarriage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 106–110.
142 Kaplan HB. Social psychology of the immune system: a conceptual
framework and review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1991; 33:
143 Arck PC, Rose M, Hertwig K, Hagen E, Hildebrandt M, Klapp BF.
Stress and immune mediators in miscarriage. Hum Reprod 2001;
144 Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Furukawa TA, Nakano Y, Hori S, Aoki K,
Kitamura T. Depression as a potential causal factor in subsequent
miscarriage in recurrent spontaneous aborters. Hum Reprod 2002;
145 Craig M, Tata P, Regan L. Psychiatric morbidity amongst women
with recurrent miscarriage. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 23:
146 Stray-Pedersen B, Stray-Pedersen S. Etiologic factors and
subsequent reproductive performance in 195 couples with a prior
history of habitual abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1984; 148: 140–46.
147 Cliff ord K, Rai R, Regan L. Future pregnancy outcome in
unexplained recurrent fi rst trimester miscarriage. Hum Reprod
1997; 12: 387–89.
148 Liddell HS, Pattison NS, Zanderigo A. Recurrent
miscarriage—outcome after supportive care in early pregnancy.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 31: 320–22.
149 Goldstein P, Berrier J, Rosen S, Sacks HS, Chalmers TC. A meta-
analysis of randomized control trials of progestational agents in
pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989; 96: 265–74.
150 Oates-Whitehead RM, Haas DM, Carrier JA. Progestogen for
preventing miscarriage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 4:
151 Daya S. Effi cacy of progesterone support for pregnancy in women
with recurrent miscarriage. A meta-analysis of controlled trials.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 275–80.
152 Ragusa A, de Carolis C, dal Lago A, et al. Progesterone supplement
in pregnancy: an immunologic therapy? Lupus 2004; 13: 639–42.
153 Jakubowicz DJ, Iuorno MJ, Jakubowicz S, Roberts KA, Nestler JE.
Eff ects of metformin on early pregnancy loss in the polycystic ovary
syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 524–29.
154 Glueck CJ, Wang P, Goldenberg N, Sieve-Smith L. Pregnancy
outcomes among women with polycystic ovary syndrome treated
with metformin. Hum Reprod 2002; 17: 2858–64.
155 Tulppala M, Marttunen M, Soderstrom-Anttila V, et al. Low-dose
aspirin in prevention of miscarriage in women with unexplained
or autoimmune related recurrent miscarriage: eff ect on prostacyclin
and thromboxane A2 production. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 1567–72.
156 Rai R, Backos M, Baxter N, Chilcott I, Regan L. Recurrent
miscarriage—an aspirin a day? Hum Reprod 2000; 15: 2220–23.
157 Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R. Exposure to non-steroidal anti-infl ammatory
drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based
cohort study. BMJ 2003; 327: 368.
158 Werler MM, Sheehan JE, Mitchell AA. Maternal medication use and
risks of gastroschisis and small intestinal atresia. Am J Epidemiol
2002; 155: 26–31.
159 Kozer E, Nifkar S, Costei A, Boskovic R, Nulman I, Koren G.
Aspirin consumption during the fi rst trimester of pregnancy and
congenital abnormalities: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;
160 DiNisio M, Peters L, Middledorp S. Anticoagulants for the
treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss in women without
antiphospholipid syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 2:
161 Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive
Medicine. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and recurrent
spontaneous pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 2004; 82 (suppl 1): 199–200.
162 Sherer Y, Levy Y, Langevitz P, Rauova L, Fabrizzi F, Shoenfeld Y.
Adverse eff ects of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in 56
patients with autoimmune diseases. Pharmacology 2001; 62:
163 Fleischmann RM, Iqbal I, Stern RL. Considerations with the use of
biological therapy in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.
Expert Opin Drug Saf 2004; 3: 391–403.
164 Toder V, Fein A, Carp H, Torchinsky A. TNF-alpha in pregnancy
loss and embryo maldevelopment: a mediator of detrimental
stimuli or a protector of the fetoplacental unit? J Assist Reprod Genet
2003; 20: 73–81.
165 Platteau P, Staesson C, Michaels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I,
Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy
screening in patients with recurrent miscarriages. Fertil Steril 2005;