Article

Swindells S, DiRienzo AG, Wilkin T, et al. Regimen simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone as maintenance antiretroviral therapy after sustained virologic suppression

Cornell University, Итак, New York, United States
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 08/2006; 296(7):806-14. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.7.806
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The long-term adverse effects, expense, and difficulty of adherence to antiretroviral regimens have led to studies of simpler maintenance therapies. Maintenance therapy with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir alone is a possible option because of low pill burden, once-daily dosing, safety, and unique resistance profile.
To assess whether simplified maintenance therapy with atazanavir-ritonavir alone after virologic suppression increases the risk of virologic failure (2 consecutive human immunodeficiency virus type 1 [HIV-1] RNA measurements of > or =200 copies/mL).
Single-group, open-label, multicenter, 24-week pilot study of 36 HIV-infected adults with virologic suppression for 48 weeks or longer receiving their first protease inhibitor (PI)-based regimen. The study was conducted between September 1, 2004, and April 18, 2006, at 12 participating AIDS clinical trial units in the United States.
Participants switched PIs to atazanavir-ritonavir at entry and discontinued nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) after 6 weeks.
Virologic failure within 24 weeks of discontinuing NRTIs. Other measures included HIV-1 drug resistance, plasma atazanavir concentrations, adverse events, CD4 cell counts, plasma lipid levels, and HIV-1 RNA levels in seminal plasma.
Thirty-six participants enrolled and 2 discontinued before simplification to atazanavir-ritonavir alone. Thirty-four patients were included in the analysis of the primary end point after 24 weeks: 1 withdrew voluntarily, and 33 continued the regimen. Virologic success (absence of failure) through 24 weeks of simplified therapy occurred in 91% (31 of 34 patients; lower 90% confidence interval limit = 85%). Three participants experienced virologic failure 12, 14, and 20 weeks after simplification, with plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of 4730, 1285, and 28 397 copies/mL, respectively. Resistance testing at failure did not identify PI resistance mutations. Plasma atazanavir concentrations at failure were low or below detection in 2 of 3 participants experiencing failure. There were no treatment discontinuations for adverse events after simplification; no significant changes in CD4 cell counts or plasma lipid levels; and no detectable HIV-1 RNA in seminal plasma from all 8 participants tested.
These preliminary data suggest that simplified maintenance therapy with atazanavir-ritonavir alone may be efficacious for maintaining virologic suppression in carefully selected patients with HIV infection. These findings require confirmation in larger, randomized trials of this strategy.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00084019.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Catherine Godfrey, Dec 12, 2013
0 Followers
 · 
96 Views
  • Source
    • "The efficacy of such treatments was limited by frequent adverse events and a significant interference of treatment in patients' lives (Moyle & Gazzard, 1999). In the present decade, strategies such as once-daily regimens have been developed to diminish the negative impact of treatment on quality of life and the appearance of less complex and toxic antiretroviral drugs has improved the management of HIV infection considerably (Negredo et al., 2004; Swindells et al., 2006). The effects of the benefits of these regimens on adherence have been uneven, however (Hammer et al., 2006), possibly because research has usually been carried out in already adherent patients with chronically suppressed viral loads (Negredo et al., 2004; Portsmouth et al., 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this study was to assess adherence of HIV-1-infected patients who started treatment in the pre-HAART era and to determine variables associated with better adherence, including relevant attitudes and beliefs. This is a cross-sectional study enrolling patients who had received antiretroviral therapy for >or=10 years. Adherence was evaluated through self-reporting and plasma drug concentrations. Treatment variables, attitudes and beliefs were collected during structured interviews. The results show that for 87 patients the median (interquartile range) time on therapy was 13 (10-19) years; 80 were on therapy at the time of analysis. Adherence was >or=95% in 54 patients (67.5%), 90-94% in 22 (27.5%) and <90% in 4 (5%). Drug concentrations were below the lower limit of detection in five patients. Younger age (p=0.014), female gender (p=0.005), current substance abuse (p=0.004) and hepatitis C virus co-infection (p<0.001) were related to lower adherence. Adherence did not differ in relation to different drug families or once- or twice-daily regimens. Patients with adherence <95% were more likely to have interrupted treatment without doctor's recommendation (p=0.009). Adherent patients exhibited a higher perception of risk of developing the illness and of benefits of therapy, higher self-efficacy and intention to adhere and were more influenced by events that motivate medication intake. To conclude, adherence was >90% in most patients on antiretroviral therapy for >or=10 years. Adherence was more related to beliefs about health and illness than to the characteristics of medication or level of knowledge about treatment. Care adherence interventions should include assessment of health beliefs.
    AIDS Care 08/2008; 20(7):796-805. DOI:10.1080/09540120701694022 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Guidelines for the use of antiretrovirals for HIV-1 infection recommend combining at least three agents. Toxicities, cost, and the complexity of such regimens warrant the search for other options. Boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy is one of the appealing options being investigated. Herein we review uncontrolled and controlled clinical trials evaluating boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in several clinical settings: maintenance therapy, induction-maintenance strategies, and first-line treatment. Boosted lopinavir monotherapy has been largely investigated in maintenance and induction-maintenance strategies, showing its ability to maintain viral suppression in the majority of participants. The major concern is the higher proportion of patients experiencing transient episodes of low-level viremia (HIV-RNA 50-500 copies/ml) when compared to classical triple regimens. No protease inhibitor-associated resistance mutation was detected in patients who failed on boosted lopinavir monotherapy. Three uncontrolled maintenance strategy studies with boosted atazanavir monotherapy showed conflicting results. Thus, the reassuring results obtained with lopinavir might not be extended to the whole protease inhibitor class, warranting further studies with new generation protease inhibitors such as darunavir. Finally, one controlled trial comparing first-line boosted lopinavir monotherapy to a standard triple combination showed that the latter outperformed the boosted protease inhibitor monotherapy in this clinical setting. In summary, a boosted protease inhibitor single-agent strategy can maintain continuous plasma HIV-RNA suppression in a large proportion of patients already suppressed on a standard triple combination. The more frequent occurrence of low-level viremia, however, does not allow the widespread use of such a strategy outside of clinical studies at this time.
    AIDS reviews 01/2008; 10(1):4-14. · 4.02 Impact Factor
Show more