Article

Assessment of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization Program

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Baltimore, Maryland 21244-1850, USA.
Annals of internal medicine (Impact Factor: 16.1). 10/2006; 145(5):342-53. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-5-200609050-00134
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Studies have shown improvement in quality of health care in the United States. However, the factors responsible for this improvement are largely unknown.
To evaluate the effect of the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) Program in 4 clinical settings by using performance data for 41 quality measures during the 7th Scope of Work.
Observational study in which differences in quality measures were compared between baseline and remeasurement periods for providers that received different levels of QIO interventions.
Nursing homes, home health agencies, hospitals, and physician offices in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, and 2 U.S. territories.
Providers receiving focused QIO assistance related to quality measures and providers receiving general informational assistance from QIOs.
5 nursing home quality measures, 11 home health measures, 21 hospital measures, and 4 physician office measures.
For nursing home, home health, and physician office measures, providers recruited specifically by QIOs for receipt of assistance showed greater improvement in performance on 18 of 20 measures than did providers who were not recruited; similar improvement was seen on the other 2 measures. Nursing homes and home health agencies improved more in all measures on which they chose to work with the QIO than in other measures. Nineteen of 21 hospital measures showed improvement; in this setting, QIOs were contracted for improvement initiatives solely at the statewide level. Overall, improvement was seen in 34 of 41 measures from baseline to remeasurement in the 7th Scope of Work.
As in any observational study, selection bias, regression to the mean, and secular trends may have influenced the results.
These findings are consistent with an impact of the QIO Program and QIO technical assistance on the observed improvement. Future evaluations of the QIO Program will attempt to better address the limitations of the design of this study.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Edwin D. Huff, Aug 16, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
310 Views
  • Source
    • "The merging of quality core measures by CMS and JCAHO, which are aligned with the ACC/AHA performance measure, has allowed the streamlining of the process of data collection, and provides a strong incentive to identify gaps and correct them with quality improvement interventions. The relationship of direct involvement by statewide quality improvement organizations with their expertise in data collection and analysis and quality improvement consultation in facilitating quality improvement has been confirmed [147] "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article was originally planned to appear in the October 2007 issue of Critical Care Clinics. The goal of this article is to summarize the indicators, processes, and dimensions of care that are linked to desired clinical outcomes of the most commonly encountered conditions in the acute cardiovascular care setting, and specifically, acute coronary syndromes and congestive heart failure. Additionally, it reinforces the concepts of best cardiovascular care practice and reviews some of the highly successful quality initiatives that have demonstrated a link between hospital process performance and outcomes. Particular attention is focused on the evidence-based treatments and diagnostic evaluation and processes of inpatient cardiovascular care, which lead to desired outcomes meaningful to patients and where available, provide physicians with the strategies and tools to be successful in translating scientific evidence into effective and rewarding care.
    Critical Care Clinics 02/2008; 24(1):201-29, x. DOI:10.1016/j.ccc.2007.09.002 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: More than 1 million adults make the transition from nursing homes to the community every year, often using formal health services including Medicare Part A skilled home health care. Although the need for discharge planning is well described, and the risks associated with care transitions are increasingly recognized, there is very limited information about the process and outcomes as patients move from nursing home to home. This paper reviews pertinent published data and health services research as background information and outlines a research agenda for studying these important transitions.
    Home Health Care Services Quarterly 02/2007; 26(4):121-31. DOI:10.1300/J027v26n04_09
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although recent heart failure (HF) management guidelines recommend delivery of patient education and discharge instructions, little is known about predictors of delivery of these materials or how such materials relate to outpatient disposition postdischarge. This report assesses the degree to which the full set of HF discharge instructions and education comprising the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations process-of-care measure (HF-1) was provided, identifies factors predictive of use of HF-1, and determines if HF-1 predicts postdischarge outcome disposition in a registry and performance improvement (PI) program for patients hospitalized for HF. In the Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients with Heart Failure (ie, OPTIMIZE-HF), of 33,681 patients from 259 US hospitals, 54% received HF-1. Some patient and site characteristics, such as symptoms on admission and performance of coronary angiography, were positively associated with delivery of the full set of HF-1 components, and others, such as African-American or Hispanic race and Midwest site location, were negatively associated with HF-1 delivery. However, delivery of the full set of HF-1 components was significantly more likely in the 46% of patients receiving PI tools (OR 2.23, 95% CI 2.12-2.35; P < .0001). Delivery of the full set of HF-1 components was significantly associated with use of specialty referral programs after discharge (P < .0001). Despite recommendations that complete instructions be given to patients with HF before hospital discharge, both PI tools to facilitate HF-1 and HF-1 itself are underused. Efforts should focus on strengthening processes and structures that will improve consistent delivery of HF-1 to all patients.
    Journal of cardiac failure 04/2007; 13(3):189-98. DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2006.11.008 · 3.07 Impact Factor
Show more

Questions & Answers about this publication

  • Edwin D. Huff added an answer in Perioperative Nursing:
    Working in quality improvement for the operating room, what are some 'meaningful' performance measures you have used, possibly using EMR based data?
    Understanding and improving perioperative care delivery will benefit from measures that are actionable. I am interested in learning more about sample measures. EMR's have much to offer and I am interested in the use of actionable measures.
    Edwin D. Huff · Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
    Timely and appropriate pre-op antibiotic administration has been a major measure in surgical QI done across the country under the Medicare QIO program. Dr. Dale Bratzler was the clinical leader, and has published a lot on the topic. See a link to his work by putting his name in the upper right search box.

    A summary view of some of the measures used can be found
    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6878455_Assessment_of_the_Medicare_quality_improvement_organization_program?ev=prf_pub

    Best of actionable luck!
  • Edwin D. Huff added an answer in Public Health:
    I would like to receive any impression or information about health system evaluation based on primary health care.
    I am part of a group of researchers which is working on cities surrounding of our capital Brasilia. we are evaluating the health system of five satellite cities. My core is primary health care, does anyone have some experience in this field?
    Edwin D. Huff · Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
    Carlos,

    Here are a three examples of published monitoring of health care quality that include outpatient - primary care components, in the United States:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/10953492_Change_in_the_quality_of_care_delivered_to_Medicare_beneficiaries_1998-1999_to_2000-2001?ev=pub_cit

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/6878455_Assessment_of_the_Medicare_quality_improvement_organization_program?ev=prf_pub

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/225303720_2011_National_Healthcare_Quality_Report?ev=prf_pub