Fracture risk in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Department of Haematology Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
British Journal of Haematology (Impact Factor: 4.71). 11/2006; 135(1):62-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2006.06269.x
Source: PubMed


Little information is available on the risk of fractures in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). We identified 1535 patients with MGUS between 1978 and 2003 in North Jutland County, Denmark. The population control group consisted of 15 350 persons selected from the Danish Central Population Registry, matched by age and sex. Data on fractures in the two groups were obtained from the regional Hospital Discharge Registry. In the MGUS cohort, 187 first-time fractures were identified during 9754 person-years of follow-up, corresponding to an incidence rate of 19/1000 person-years. The adjusted relative risk for fractures among MGUS patients compared with population controls was 1.4 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-1.6]. After 5 years of follow-up, the risk difference was 1.8% (95% CI, 0.5-3.0). Six of the 187 MGUS patients with fractures were later diagnosed with malignant transformation. Relative risks for fractures were increased in IgG-type MGUS [1.3 (95% CI,1.1-1.6)], IgM-type MGUS [1.6 (95% CI, 1.1-2.2)] and MGUS with kappa light chain [1.4 (95% CI, 1.1-1.7)]. MGUS patients had an increased risk of fractures, which could not be explained by comorbidity, advanced age, gender or malignant transformation.

Download full-text


Available from: Mette Nørgaard, May 05, 2015
  • Source
    • "In order to exclude cases of asymptomatic multiple myeloma, we excluded patients if their levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM were 30 g/L or higher. Identification and verification of this MGUS cohort has previously been described in detail.7,13 In the period January 2001–February 2011, we identified 791 patients with MGUS using this algorithm. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To estimate the positive predictive value (PPV) and completeness of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) diagnosis coding in a hospital registry within a population-based health-care setting. Through the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR), we identified 627 patients registered with MGUS in two Danish regions during the period January 2001-February 2011. We reviewed the medical records of all patients registered with MGUS at the Department of Hematology, Aalborg University Hospital, and a sample of patients registered at the other three hematological departments in the two regions. We estimated the PPV of the MGUS diagnosis based on this sample of 327 medical records. We also estimated the completeness of the DNPR by linking data from the DNPR and data from a previously validated MGUS cohort of 791 patients identified through the laboratory system covering North Jutland Region. The diagnosis of MGUS was confirmed in 231 patients and assessed as probable in an additional 38 patients, corresponding to a PPV of 82.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 78.1%-86.4%). By contrast, 58 (17.7%) of the patients did not definitively meet the diagnostic criteria for MGUS. When we excluded patients registered with malignant monoclonal gammopathy recorded prior to or within the first year after registration of MGUS in the DNPR, the PPV increased to 88.3% (95% CI 84.5%-92.1%). The DNPR only registered a diagnosis of MGUS in 133 of the 791 MGUS patients identified through the laboratory system, corresponding to a completeness of 16.8% (95% CI 14.1%-19.6%). The PPV of the diagnosis coding for MGUS in the DNPR is high and can be further improved by simple data restriction. However, the low completeness raises concern that MGUS patients registered in the hospital system may be highly selected.
    Clinical Epidemiology 08/2013; 5(1):321-6. DOI:10.2147/CLEP.S50757
  • Source
    • "As mentioned previously, persons with MGUS are at increased risk for fractures, especially involving the vertebral bodies (Melton et al, 2004; Gregersen et al, 2006). Patients in whom fractures are identified should be further evaluated by a bone specialist. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On February 25, 2009, a panel of international experts on plasma cell dyscrasia and skeletal disease met to discuss monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). This non-malignant B-cell disorder is the most common plasma cell dyscrasia and is associated with an increased risk of developing serious B-cell disorders. Individuals with MGUS also have an increased risk of osteoporosis and osteopenia associated with an increased likelihood of developing fractures especially in the vertebral column, peripheral neuropathy and thromboembolic events. The goal of the meeting was to develop a consensus statement regarding the appropriate tests to screen, evaluate and follow-up patients with MGUS. The panel also addressed the identification and treatment of MGUS-related skeletal problems, thromboembolic events and neurological complications. The following consensus statement outlines the conclusions and marks the first time that a consensus statement for the screening and treatment of MGUS has been clearly stated.
    British Journal of Haematology 07/2010; 150(1):28-38. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08207.x · 4.71 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) the increase of bone turnover rate can increase the risk of fracture. Thus, a treatment normalizing this negative balance could be of benefit in these patients. We studied 100 patients affected by MGUS, grouped according to the presence (group A, 50 patients) or absence (group B) of vertebral fractures and/or osteoporosis. Group A was treated with alendronate (70 mg/weekly) plus calcium and cholecalciferol for 18 months, and group B was treated with calcium and cholecalciferol. After 18 months, the mean bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and total femur had increased by 6.1% and 1.5%, respectively, in group A. In the nine patients of this group not taking alendronate, BMD values of the lumbar spine and total femur decreased by 1.6% (P < or = 0.001 ) and 1.3% (P < or = 0.01), respectively. In patients of group B, BMD increased by 1.2% at the lumbar spine and decreased by 1.2% at the total femur. Corresponding figures of those patients in the same group not taking calcium and vitamin D supplementation were -0.1% and -1.2%, respectively. At 18 months we observed significant decreases of serum bone markers: the difference between the groups was -23.2 (P < or = 0.01) for bone alkaline phosphatase, -23.6 for osteocalcin (P < or = 0.01), -35.1 for C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type I (P < or = 0.001), and -0.47 for bone sialoprotein (P = nonsignificant). Treatment with alendronate could lead to a significant reduction in fracture risk in MGUS patients with skeletal fragility.
    Calcified Tissue International 06/2008; 82(6):418-26. DOI:10.1007/s00223-008-9145-2 · 3.27 Impact Factor
Show more