Article

Gizzard shad put a freeze on winter mortality of age-0 yellow perch but not white perch.

Department of Natural Resources, Cornell Biological Field Station, Cornell University, Bridgeport, New York 13030, USA.
Ecological Applications (Impact Factor: 3.82). 09/2006; 16(4):1487-501. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1487:GSPAFO]2.0.CO;2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Four decades of observations on the limnology and fishes of Oneida Lake, New York, USA, provided an opportunity to investigate causes of mortality during winter, a period of resource scarcity for most juvenile fishes, in age-0 yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and age-0 white perch (Morone americana). This time series contains several environmental (e.g., winter severity) and biological (e.g., predator abundance) signals that can be used to disentangle multiple effects on overwinter mortality of these fishes. A multiple regression analysis indicated that age-0 yellow perch winter mortality was inversely related to fish length in autumn and to the abundance of alternative prey (gizzard shad [Dorosoma cepedianum] and white perch). However, no length-selective predation of yellow perch by one of the main predators, adult walleye (Sander vitreus), was detected. In contrast, white perch mortality was directly associated with total predator biomass and abundance of white perch in autumn, and inversely related to yellow perch abundance as a potential buffer species, but not to the abundance of gizzard shad. Winter severity was not a significant predictor of mortality for either perch species. Predicted winter starvation mortality, from a model described in the literature, was much lower than observed mortality for yellow perch. Similar models for white perch were correlated with observed mortality. These results collectively suggest that predation is the main mechanism shaping winter mortality of yellow perch, while both predation and starvation may be important for white perch. This analysis also revealed that gizzard shad buffer winter mortality of yellow perch. Although winter duration determines the northern limit of fish distributions, in mid-latitude Oneida Lake and for these species, predator-prey interactions seem to exert a greater influence on winter mortality than starvation.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
163 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Walleye Sander vitreus and yellow perch Perca flavescens are well-studied, ecologically important fish species that co-occur in a wide range of systems and experience complex interactions; on the one hand, they are physiologically and ecologically similar and therefore may respond analogously to environmental variation, while on the other hand they interact antagonistically as competitors, predators, and prey. In Saginaw Bay, Lake Huron, walleyes and yellow perch have supported a combination of commercial and recreational fisheries and have been exposed to a series of ecosystem-level stressors and management actions that may have impacted these populations via multiple pathways. We used dynamic factor analysis and correlation analysis of walleye and yellow perch annual fall trawl catch data to elucidate the overall trends in walleye and yellow perch populations in Saginaw Bay. The results suggest that walleyes and yellow perch trend differently; while the relative abundance of age-0–2 walleyes generally increased and their mean length decreased from 1980 to 2008, the trends in yellow perch abundance and length differed among the young-of-year, yearling, and age-2 age-classes. Moreover, interannual negative associations between yellow perch relative abundance and mean size are suggestive of compensatory, density-dependent control on growth, while similar evidence is lacking for walleyes. Correlation analyses indicate that walleye year-class strength is set by the fall of age 0, while the age at which recruitment is set for yellow perch is less clear and may not occur until the fall of age 1. Thus, we suggest that future studies evaluating environmental determinants of year-class strength in Saginaw Bay evaluate age-0 walleyes and age-1 yellow perch. Finally, while age-0 yellow perch and age-0 walleyes appear to respond similarly to annual environmental conditions, the recent increase in walleye abundance and decrease in the mean size of age-0 yellow perch may have contributed to the reduced abundance of adult yellow perch via walleye predation and overwinter mortality.Received July 15, 2010; accepted February 18, 2011
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 07/2011; 140(4):1078-1092. · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding the environmental factors that regulate fish recruitment is essential for effective management of fisheries. Generally, first-year survival, and therefore recruitment, is inherently less consistent in systems with high intra- and interannual variability. Irrigation reservoirs display sporadic patterns of annual drawdown, which can pose a substantial challenge to recruitment of fishes. We developed species-specific models using an 18-year data set compiled from state and federal agencies to investigate variables that regulate the recruitment of walleye Sander vitreus and white bass Morone chrysops in irrigation reservoirs in south-west Nebraska, USA. The candidate model set for walleye included only abiotic variables (water-level elevation, minimum daily air temperature during winter prior to hatching, annual precipitation, spring warming rate and May reservoir discharge), and the candidate model set for white bass included primarily biotic variables (catch per unit effort (CPUE) of black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus, CPUE of age-0 walleye, CPUE of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus and CPUE of age-3 and older white bass), each of which had a greater relative importance than the single abiotic variable (minimum daily air temperature during winter after hatching). Our findings improve the understanding of the recruitment of fishes in irrigation reservoirs and the relative roles of abiotic and biotic factors.
    Ecology of Fresh Water Fish 01/2013; 22(1). · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fisheries managers often stock prey fish to increase abundance and growth of predatory sport fishes. One species commonly used in the U.S. Midwest is gizzard shad Dorosoma cepedianum; gizzard shad have been used to increase growth and condition of walleye Sander vitreus in many Midwestern systems. Additionally, with warming climates and stocking, gizzard shad are experiencing a natural range expansion. While this expansion may be beneficial for top predators like walleye, mixed results exist on the effects of gizzard shad on other recreationally important fishes in these systems. Our objectives were to determine if annual growth, relative abundance, and condition of yellow perch, Perca flavescens and walleye populations changed following the introduction of gizzard shad. Adult, pre-spawn gizzard shad were introduced in 2008 and 2009 at densities higher than those which resulted in self-sustaining populations in other South Dakota reservoirs. Yellow perch and walleye population dynamics were estimated during 2007 (pre-shad), 2008–2009 (shad present) and 2010 (post-shad) in two glacial lakes stocked with adult gizzard shad and a reference lake (not stocked with shad). Our results suggest that at the densities documented in this study and in the time frame assessed, gizzard shad did not negatively impact yellow perch as total length at age was similar, condition remained high and zooplankton resources were likely not limiting. Walleye did consume gizzard shad when available and shad appeared to have a neutral or positive effect on walleye growth, relative abundance and condition in these systems during this study. The addition of shad may be a viable option to improve walleye populations without negatively impacting sympatric yellow perch populations under the conditions tested in this study. However, the introduction of a non-indigenous species should be done with caution, especially a potential competitor like gizzard shad.
    Fisheries Research 02/2014; 150:49–59. · 1.70 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
67 Downloads
Available from
May 22, 2014