Article

Exploring the comparability of the Sensory Organization Test and the Pediatric Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction for Balance in children.

Ecole de réadaptation, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Canada.
Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics (Impact Factor: 1.42). 02/2006; 26(1-2):23-41. DOI: 10.1300/J006v26n01_04
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The Sensory Organization Test (SOT) and the Pediatric Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction for Balance (PCTSIB) quantify the ability to maintain balance in the presence of sensory conflicts. The purposes were to explore the concurrent validity of these two assessments by comparing the performance of healthy children on the tests and examine the relationship between age and assessment performances thereby exploring the construct validity of the measures.
Sixteen healthy children (9.8 +/- 3.5 yr.).
Children were assessed with both tools during a single session.
Only three conditions of the SOT were related to the corresponding PCTSIB conditions: eyes closed in tandem and single leg stance (SLS), and altered vision in SLS. None of the conditions involving altered support surfaces were related. All SOT conditions and four PCTSIB conditions in SLS, were significantly related to age as well as one condition in tandem.
Although both tests are associated with age, they do not measure sensory organization abilities in the same manner. As such, they each provide different and complementary information about healthy children's ability to maintain balance.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
69 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: L'évolution des soins médicaux auprès de la population ayant une lésion médullaire (LM) s'est traduite par une amélioration du profil fonctionnel des personnes atteintes. Ainsi une proportion importante retrouve une capacité à se tenir debout et à marcher qu'il convient d'évaluer adéquatement. Si quelques outils spécifiques à la population lésée médullaire existent pour évaluer leur ambulation, aucune évaluation de l'équilibre debout n'a été validée auprès de cette clientèle. L'échelle de Berg est un outil recommandé auprès de diverses populations, entre autres celles possédant des pathologies d'origine neurologique; et le score obtenu semble lié au niveau d'autonomie à la marche ainsi qu'aux aides techniques utilisées. L'objectif de ce projet de recherche était donc d'établir la validité concomitante de l'échelle de Berg auprès de la population LM et d'explorer les liens entre le score Berg et l'aide technique utilisée. Pour ce faire, trente-deux sujets BM ASIA D ont été recrutés parmi la clientèle hospitalisée de l'Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal. L'évaluation de l'équilibre debout a été réalisée à l'aide de l'échelle de Berg ainsi que des tests statiques, dynamiques et des limites de stabilité du Balance Master. Le Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI), le Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI), la vitesse de marche sur 10m et le Timed up and go ont été utilisés pour évaluer l'ambulation. Des analyses descriptives et corrélatives ont été effectuées sur les données obtenues. Une corrélation forte (0.714<Rs<0.816; p<0.01) a été observée entre l'échelle de Berg et les diverses évaluations de la marche. Des associations adéquates ont également été obtenues entre l'échelle de Berg et le test des limites de stabilité du Balance Master (-0.752<Rs<-0.463; p<0.01). Les épreuves statiques du Balance Master ont révélé de plus faibles corrélations avec les diverses mesures cliniques (-0.444<Rs<-0.414; p<0.01). Finalement, les épreuves dynamiques antéropostérieures et médiolatérales du Balance Master ont indiqué une relation équivoque avec l'échelle de Berg, n'étant reliées significativement qu'avec certaines épreuves en antéropostérieur (3 et 1s; -0.590<Rs<-0.524; p<0.01). Un effet plafond significatif est visible sur l'échelle de Berg, le WISCI et le SCI-FAI limitant leur utilité pour les personnes ayant une récupération supérieure. Les résultats ont aussi montré un profil différent des personnes tétraplégiques quant à la réussite des différentes épreuves du Berg par comparaison aux sujets paraplégiques. Pour les résultats reliés aux aides techniques, l’analyse des données descriptives révèlent que le score Berg permet généralement de faire la distinction entre les personnes indépendantes d'aides techniques, les utilisateurs de marchettes de béquilles ou de cannes, et ce, particulièrement pour les personnes paraplégiques. Cette étude a permis de documenter la validité concomitante de l'échelle de Berg auprès des personnes LM ayant une lésion incomplète (ASIA D) étant donné les relations élevées démontrées entre les paramètres de la marche et les résultats à certains tests du Balance Master. En somme, la présente étude permet de recommander l'utilisation de l'échelle de Berg pour évaluer l'équilibre debout des personnes LM. The evolution of medical practices for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed their functional profile with the result that a significant proportion recovers their ability to stand and walk. Implementing a validated scale to evaluate these aspects is therefore crucial during rehabilitation. Various walking scales have been developed specific to the SCI population, such as the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) and the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI). However, no known balance evaluation has been recommended for this population. The Berg Balance Scale has been developed and validated for various populations presenting neurological disorders. An association has been shown between the Berg score and the level of independence as well as the walking assistive devices used. The purpose of this project was therefore to validate the Berg Balance Scale for the SCI population and to explore the relationship between the Berg score and the walking assistive devices used. Thirty-two subjects were recruited from the SCI population of the Institut de réadaptation Gingras-Lindsay de Montréal. Walking evaluation was performed using the WISCI, the SCI-FAI, the walking speed on 10m and the Timed Up and Go. The balance evaluation was carried out using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) as well as the static, dynamic and limits-of-stability tests of the Balance Master. Descriptive and correlational analyses were performed on the sample. The results showed a strong correlation between the BBS and all walking evaluations (0.714<Rs<0.816; p<0.01). The BBS was also strongly related to the limits-of-stability test (-0.752<Rs<-0.463; p<0.01). The static tests of the Balance Master were weakly correlated with the various clinical evaluations (-0.444<Rs<-0.414; p<0.01) while the dynamic tests resulted in equivocal associations with BBS, being better for the anteroposterior test (3 and 1s conditions; -0.590<Rs<-0.524; p<0.01). A significant ceiling effect was present ion the BBS, the WISCI and the SCI-FAI scales. The results also showed that paraplegic and tetraplegic subjects differ in their performance in the various items of the BBS. Descriptive analysis reveals that the BBS score can help to discriminate between walker, crutches and cane users and individuals walking independently, especially in the case of people with paraplegia. This study revealed that the BBS is a valid balance evaluation for people with incomplete (ASIA D) spinal cord injury. Its use for evaluating standing balance in the clinical and laboratory setting is therefore recommended.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with hearing impairments have a higher risk for deficits in balance and gross motor skills compared with children who are developing typically. As balance is a fundamental ability for the motor development of children, a valid and reliable assessment to identify weaknesses in balance is crucial. The purpose of this study was to investigate the construct validity of posturography and clinical balance tests in children with hearing impairments and in children who are developing typically. The study involved 53 children with typical development and 23 children with hearing impairments who were between 6 and 12 years of age and without neuromotor or orthopedic disorders. All participants completed 3 posturography tests (modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction of Balance [mCTSIB], unilateral stance, and tandem stance) and 4 clinical balance tests (one-leg stance with eyes open and with eyes closed, balance beam walking, and one-leg hopping). Three conditions of the mCTSIB, unilateral stance, and 2 clinical balance tests were able to distinguish significantly between the 2 groups. Children with hearing impairments showed more difficulties in balance tasks compared with children who were developing typically when 1 or 2 types of sensory information were eliminated or disturbed. The study showed only low to moderate correlations among the different methods of evaluating balance. Clinical balance tests and posturography offer different but complementary information. An assessment protocol for balance consisting of posturography and clinical balance tasks is proposed. Static and dynamic balance abilities could not be differentiated and seem not to be a valid dichotomy.
    Physical Therapy 10/2010; 90(12):1783-94. DOI:10.2522/ptj.20100080 · 3.25 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine reliability, diagnostic values, and minimal detectable change scores, 90% confidence (MDC90) of pediatric clinical tests of vestibular function. Twenty children with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and 23 children with typical development, aged 6 to 12 years, participated. The Head Thrust Test, Emory Clinical Vestibular Chair Test, Bucket Test, Dynamic Visual Acuity, Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, and Sensory Organization Test were completed twice for reliability. Reference standard diagnostic tests were rotary chair and vestibular evoked myogenic potential. Reliability, sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and MDC90 scores were calculated. Reliability ranged from an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.73 to 0.95. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values, using cutoff scores for each test representing the largest area under the curve, ranged from 63% to 100%. The MDC90 for Dynamic Visual Acuity and Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance were 8 optotypes and 16.75 seconds, respectively. Clinical tests can be used accurately to identify children with vestibular hypofunction.
    Pediatric physical therapy: the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association 06/2014; 26(2):180-9. DOI:10.1097/PEP.0000000000000039