Article

Immunohistochemical staining of hMLH1 and hMSH2 reflects microsatellite instability status in ovarian carcinoma.

Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Modern Pathology (Impact Factor: 5.25). 12/2006; 19(11):1414-20. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3800672
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Microsatellite instability is due to defects in the family of DNA repair genes, primarily hMLH1 and hMSH2, which can be detected by immunohistochemical staining. However, it is unclear whether immunohistochemical staining can accurately predict microsatellite instability status. We sought here to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of immunostaining for the expression of the DNA mismatch-repair genes hMLH1 or hMSH2 in predicting microsatellite instability in ovarian carcinoma. Tissue microarrays with specimens from 322 women with primary ovarian carcinoma were stained with antibodies to hMLH1 and hMSH2; cases in which either hMLH1 or hMSH2 were negative were analyzed for microsatellite instability with the five-marker panel recommended by the National Cancer Institute (BAT26, BAT25, D5S346, D2S123, and D17S250). Microsatellite instability was also analyzed in another 19 cases selected at random in which both hMLH1 and hMSH2 were positive. Tumors with instability at two or more of the five NCI markers were considered to have a high level of microsatellite instability; tumors showing instability at only one marker were considered microsatellite instability-low; and tumors in which no markers exhibited microsatellite instability were considered microsatellite stable. We found that negative staining for hMLH1 protein (five cases) or hMSH2 protein (two cases) was associated with high level of microsatellite instability. The sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemical staining for hMLH1 were 62 and 100% and those of hMSH2 alone were 25 and 100%. Combining loss of expression of both hMLH1 and hMSH2 led to sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 87, 100, 100, and 95%. These results suggest that use of a two-molecule panel (hMLH1 and hMSH2) can accurately determine the microsatellite instability status of patients with ovarian cancer.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
40 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ect2, a Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor (RhoGEF), is atypical among RhoGEFs in its predominantly nuclear localization in interphase cells. One current model suggests that Ect2 mislocalization drives cellular transformation by promoting aberrant activation of cytoplasmic Rho family GTPase substrates. However, in ovarian cancers, where Ect2 is both amplified and overexpressed at the mRNA level, we observed that the protein is highly expressed and predominantly nuclear and that nuclear but not cytoplasmic Ect2 increases with advanced disease. Knockdown of Ect2 in ovarian cancer cell lines impaired their anchorage-independent growth without affecting their growth on plastic. Restoration of Ect2 expression rescued the anchorage-independent growth defect, but not if either the DH catalytic domain or the nuclear localization sequences of Ect2 were mutated. These results suggested a novel mechanism whereby Ect2 could drive transformation in ovarian cancer cells by acting as a RhoGEF specifically within the nucleus. Interestingly, Ect2 had an intrinsically distinct GTPase specificity profile in the nucleus versus the cytoplasm. Nuclear Ect2 bound preferentially to Rac1, while cytoplasmic Ect2 bound to RhoA but not Rac. Consistent with nuclear activation of endogenous Rac, Ect2 overexpression was sufficient to recruit Rac effectors to the nucleus, a process that required a functional Ect2 catalytic domain. Furthermore, expression of active nuclearly targeted Rac1 rescued the defect in transformed growth caused by Ect2 knockdown. Our work suggests a novel mechanism of Ect2-driven transformation, identifies subcellular localization as a regulator of GEF specificity, and implicates activation of nuclear Rac1 in cellular transformation.
    Genes & cancer 11/2013; 4(11-12):460-75.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: DNA mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is associated with increased risk of developing several types of cancer and is the most common cause of hereditary ovarian cancer after BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. While there has been extensive investigation of MMR deficiency in colorectal cancer, MMR in ovarian cancer is relatively under-investigated. This review summarises the mechanism of MMR, the ways in which MMR deficiency can promote carcinogenesis in general and then assesses the available studies regarding MMR deficiency in ovarian cancers with specific emphasis on implications for disease incidence and therapy. The incidence of germline MMR gene mutations in ovarian cancer is only 2% but other mechanisms of gene inactivation mean that loss of expression of one of the seven main genes (MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, MLH1, MLH3, PMS1 and PMS2) occurs in up to 29% of cases. Both mutational and expression data suggest that MMR deficiency is more common in non-serous ovarian cancer. Some studies suggest an improved survival for patients with MMR deficiency compared to historical controls but these do not account for the preponderance of non-serous tumours. A number of in vitro studies have suggested that MMR deficiency is a cause of platinum resistance. To date this has not been categorically demonstrated in the clinic. Larger studies that account for stage of presentation and immunohistochemical subtype are required to assess the effect of MMR deficiency on survival and chemosensitivity. Investigation of MMR related synthetic lethality in colorectal cancer has identified Dihydrofolate reductase, DNA polymerase β and DNA polymerase γ and PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 as synthetic lethal to certain MMR defects by causing accumulation of oxidative DNA damage. These synthetic lethal targets require tested and others should be sought within the context of MMR deficient ovarian cancer in an attempt to provide novel therapeutic strategies for these patients.
    Gynecologic Oncology 12/2013; · 3.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: In epithelial ovarian cancer, concordance between results of microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical (IHC) testing has not been demonstrated. This study evaluated the association of MSI-high (MSI-H) status with loss of expression (LoE) of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins on IHC and assessed for potential factors affecting the strength of the association. Methods: Tumor specimens from three population-based studies of epithelial ovarian cancer were stained for MMR proteins through manual or automated methods, and results were interpreted by one of two pathologists. Tumor and germline DNA was extracted and MSI testing performed. Multivariable logistic regression models were fitted to predict loss of IHC expression based on MSI status after adjusting for staining method and reading pathologist. Results: Of 834 cases, 564 (67.6%) were concordant; 41 were classified as MSI-H with LoE and 523 as microsatellite stable (MSS) with no LoE. Of the 270 discordant cases, 83 were MSI-H with no LoE and 187 were MSS with LoE. Both IHC staining method and reading pathologist were strongly associated with discordant results. Conclusions: Lack of concordance in the current study may be related to inconsistencies in IHC testing methods and interpretation. Results support the need for validation studies before routine screening of ovarian tumors is implemented in clinical practice for the purpose of identifying Lynch syndrome.
    Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 03/2014; · 1.44 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from