Article

Determinants of perinatal mortality and serious neonatal morbidity in the second twin.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and the Perinatal Epidemiology Research Unit, IWK Health Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Obstetrics and Gynecology (Impact Factor: 4.37). 10/2006; 108(3 Pt 1):556-64. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000227747.37184.0a
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify potential determinants of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity among second twins relative to first twins.
A retrospective cohort design was used to study twin deliveries in Nova Scotia from 1988 to 2002. Monoamniotic or conjoined twins and twin pairs with major congenital anomaly or antepartum fetal death of either twin were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite measure of perinatal mortality and neonatal morbidity, including birth asphyxia, respiratory distress, neonatal trauma, and infection. Risk of adverse outcome of second twins relative to first-born co-twins was determined by matched-pair analysis.
Of 1,542 twin pairs, the second twin was at greater risk of composite adverse outcome (relative risk [RR] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-1.9) than the first twin. This excess risk was evident independent of presentation, chorionicity, or infant sex but was associated with planned vaginal delivery, birth weight discordance, and prolonged interdelivery interval. Term second twins were less likely to suffer excess morbidity with elective cesarean (RR 1.0, 95% CI 0.14-7.10) than with planned vaginal delivery (RR 3.0, 95% CI 1.47-6.11). The major contributors to neonatal morbidity in the second twin were birth asphyxia at 37 weeks or later and respiratory distress syndrome at less than 37 weeks.
The second twin is at greater risk of adverse perinatal outcome than the first twin, independent of presentation, chorionicity, or infant sex. Planned vaginal delivery, birth weight discordance, and prolonged interdelivery interval increase this infant risk. Elective cesarean delivery at term may improve perinatal outcome for the second twin. However, the number of cesarean births required to prevent one case of composite adverse outcome, assuming causality, was 33.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
135 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe neonatal and obstetrical prognosis in dichorionic (DC) twins with a birth weight discordance under 20% and evaluate the influence of intrauterine growth restriction on the management.
    Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité 08/2014; · 0.58 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Objective: To evaluate the perinatal outcomes and clinical factors of unsuccessful trials of labor (TOLs) in late preterm and term twin pregnancies. Methods: We enrolled 896 consecutive twin pregnancies delivered between 1999 and 2012 in a single center, which met the following inclusion criteria: a vertex first twin, live twins, and attempted TOLs after 34 weeks. Obstetric characteristics and perinatal outcomes were compared between vaginal delivery and cesarean delivery groups. Results: Successful TOLs were carried out in 81% (726/896). Failed TOLs occurred in 15% (37/247) of late preterm twins and 20% (133/649) of term twins. Comparisons of neonatal outcomes between the groups showed no significant differences in NICU admission, ventilator use, and composite morbidity. On univariable analysis, nulliparity, preeclampsia, induced labor, excessive weight gain, and intertwin weight discordance of >30% showed significant associations with failed TOLs. Multivariable analyses revealed nulliparity (adjusted odds ratio 9.89, 95% confidence interval 4.64-21.1) and preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.30-3.63) as significantly associated with failed TOLs. Conclusion: In late preterm and term twins, trials of labor can be performed successfully without a significant increase in adverse neonatal outcomes. Nulliparity and preeclampsia are clinical factors associated with failed TOLs in twin pregnancies.
    Journal of Perinatal Medicine 04/2014; · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rate of caesarean sections in multiple births has grown sharply worldwide. The reason for this may be the results of large retrospective cohort studies from the 1990s, which displayed an increased risk of mortality and morbidity, especially for the second twin, in the case of vaginal births. Multiple monocentric analyses have not been able to confirm this. As a prospective, multi-centre randomised study, the Twin Birth Study published in 2013, in which 105 clinics in 25 countries took part, showed that, under optimum conditions, there was no difference in neonatal and maternal mortality and morbidity if the birth was planned to be vaginal or via caesarean. Detailed analyses, which would be helpful in choosing the type of birth method and obstetric management in the event of vaginal birth, have not previously been published. Retrospective studies must be referred to for this.
    Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 09/2014; 74(9):838-844. · 0.85 Impact Factor