Article

Clinical differences among patients treated for mental health problems in general medical and specialty mental health settings in the National Comoribidity Survey Replication (NCS-R)

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
General Hospital Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.9). 09/2006; 28(5):387-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.05.001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT General medical (GM) treatments for mental health disorders are less likely than specialty mental health (SMH) treatments to be adequate. We explored whether differences in the clinical characteristics of patients treated in each sector (GM-only or SMH-only) or in both sectors (GM+SMH) may help to explain this finding.
We analyzed data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), a nationally representative household survey of 5692 English-speaking adult household residents that was carried out in 2001-2003. The NCS-R used a fully structured diagnostic interview to assess DSM-IV disorders, including mood, anxiety, impulse control and substance use disorders. We classified disorders in terms of a three-category severity gradient (serious, moderate and mild) based on information about clinically significant distress and role impairment. We collected self-report data on chronic physical conditions, sociodemographics and type of treatment received for emotional and substance use problems in the 12 months before the interview.
Patients who received GM+SMH treatment had more severe mental disorders and a higher prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders than patients who received treatment in only one of the two sectors. Patients seen in the GM-only and GM+SMH sectors had more chronic physical conditions than patients seen in the SMH-only sector.
Patient characteristics may partially explain the lower intensity and adequacy of GM treatment.

0 Followers
 · 
58 Views
  • Source
    • "U, uniform DIF; N, non-uniform DIF. 1 Differences between groups are evaluated using χ 2 test statistics with 1 degree of freedom. 2 Cells were left empty if no relevant DIF was found. patients [3]. Alternatively, patients who mainly suffer from the somatic symptoms included in the IDS-SR may be more likely to end up in primary care than those who suffer from the full range of IDS-SR symptoms [40]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective To investigate the impact of differences in depressive symptom reporting across clinical groups (healthcare setting, chronic illness, depression diagnosis and anxiety diagnosis) on clinical interpretability and comparability of depression scores. Methods Participants from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (n = 2981) completed the self-report Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-SR). Differences in depressive symptom reporting between distinct clinical subpopulations were assessed using a Differential Item Functioning (DIF) analysis. The effects of DIF on symptom level were evaluated by examining whether DIF-adjustment had clinically relevant effects. Results Significant DIF was detected across all tested clinical subpopulation groupings. Clinically relevant DIF was found on the symptom level for 13 IDS-SR items. However, impact of DIF on the aggregate level ranged from small to negligible: adjustment for DIF only led to salient changes in aggregate scores for 0.2-12.7% of individuals across tested sources of DIF. Conclusion Differences in endorsement patterns of depressive symptoms were observed across clinical populations, challenging the assumptions regarding the measurement properties of self-reported depression. However, effects of DIF on the aggregate level of IDS-SR total scores were found to be minimal and not clinically important. The IDS-SR thus seems robust against DIF across clinical populations.
    Journal of Psychosomatic Research 08/2014; 78(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.014 · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Only two predisposing factors impacted healthcare service utilization: female gender and legal problems in the past 12 months. Concerning gender, several studies have found much higher healthcare service utilization for MHR among females than males [6,10-12,14,16,24,48,77,78]. A possible explanation is that females suffer more frequently from anxiety disorders, mood disorders and psychological distress [79]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study has a dual purpose: 1) identify determinants of healthcare service utilization for mental health reasons (MHR) in a Canadian (Montreal) catchment area; 2) determine the patterns of recourse to healthcare professionals in terms of frequency of visits and type of professionals consulted, and as it relates to the most prevalent mental disorders (MD) and psychological distress. Data was collected from a random sample of 1,823 individuals interviewed after a two-year follow-up period. A regression analysis was performed to identify variables associated with service utilization and complementary analyses were carried out to better understand participants' patterns of healthcare service utilization in relation to the most prevalent MD. Among 243 individuals diagnosed with a MD in the 12 months preceding an interview, 113 (46.5%) reported having used healthcare services for MHR. Determinants of service utilization were emotional and legal problems, number of MD, higher personal income, lower quality of life, inability of individuals to influence events occurring in their neighborhood, female gender and, marginally, lack of alcohol dependence in the past 12 months. Emotional problems were the most significant determinant of healthcare service utilization. Frequent visits with healthcare professionals were more likely associated with major depression and number of MD with or without dependence to alcohol or drugs. People suffering from major depression, psychological distress and social phobia were more likely to consult different professionals, while individuals with panic disorders relied on their family physician only. Concerning social phobia, panic disorders and psychological distress, more frequent visits with professionals did not translate into involvement of a higher number of professionals or vice-versa. This study demonstrates the impact of emotional problems, neighborhood characteristics and legal problems in healthcare service utilization for MHR. Interventions based on inter-professional collaboration could be prioritized to increase the ability of healthcare services to take care especially of individuals suffering from social phobia, panic disorders and psychological distress. Others actions that could be prioritized are training of family physicians in the treatment of MD, use of psychiatric consultants, internet outreach, and reimbursement of psychological consultations for individuals with low income.
    BMC Health Services Research 04/2014; 14(1):161. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-14-161 · 1.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Finally, depressed older adults have been shown to seek care most often from a primary care provider rather than from a mental health specialist (Uebelacker et al., 2006). For this reason, integrated models of care have been developed in which the physician and mental health specialist together deliver pharmacological and psychological treatments within primary care settings (Bartels et al., 2004; Bruce et al., 2004; Unützer et al., 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this experiment was to examine the efficacy of life review based on autobiographical retrieval practice for treating depression in older adults. Thirty-seven clinically depressed older adults aged 64-83, who were also receiving pharmacological treatment, were randomly assigned to life review therapy or to a placebo condition with supportive therapy. Results indicated decreased depression for both conditions, with no significant differences between the two therapies. There was some indication of greater gain in production of specific memories among those in life review therapy. Patients who produced higher numbers of specific memories decreased their depression scores at a faster rate.
    Psicothema 05/2012; 24(2):224-9. · 0.96 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview

Download
0 Downloads
Available from