Article

Use of anteriorly based pericranial flap in frontal sinus obliteration

Department of Surgery, Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.72). 10/2006; 135(3):413-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.03.041
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In an era of endoscopic sinus surgery, frontal sinus obliteration continues to remain an important treatment option in chronic frontal sinus disease. Numerous avascular obliterative materials including fat, muscle, cancellous bone, and hydroxyapatite have been used in this procedure. In this article, we describe a vascularized anteriorly based pericranial flap to obliterate frontal sinus.
Retrospective chart review of patients referred to tertiary care hospital between 1996 and 2003.
Records of the patients who underwent this procedure were reviewed. Demographics, indications, and immediate and late complications were recorded. A phone questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction with the outcome.
A total of 12 patients underwent frontal sinus obliteration with this technique. Mean follow-up was 40 months. None of the patients developed recurrent frontal sinusitis. All of the patients were pleased with the outcome.
Pericranial flap is a highly vascularized flap that is easily harvested and is an effective and viable modality for obliterating frontal sinus. EBM rating: C-4.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Hadi Seikaly, Dec 27, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: The pericranial flaps' benefits have been described in many otolaryngologic, maxillofacial and plastic surgery literature. The benefits ar e due to the pericranial flaps unique characteristics including good flexibility and mobility, very rich blood supply from several arterial sources and access to sufficient bulk of the flap without any need for distant surgical sites. Using pericranial flaps to repair the local defects of the head and face region in several cases has been reported in this study. Materials and Methods: A follow up study was carried out on 12 patients who had undergone frontal sinus obliteration; auriculoplasty and repair of the orbital walls and scalp's defects. Pericranial flap had been used for all these patients. Demographic specifications, surgical indications, imaging evaluations and early and late complications were recorded as well. The functional and cosmetic results and also the satisfaction level of patients were also assessed.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study evaluates non-standardized subjective patient satisfaction- and clinical outcome variables following frontal sinus obliteration with abdominal fat in endoscopically inaccessible mucoceles. In a retrospective chart review, all patients who underwent frontal sinus obliteration for endoscopically inaccessible mucoceles at the Ludwig Maximilian University in Munich between 1996 and 2006 were identified and the postoperative outcomes were evaluated by a non-standardized patient questionnaire rating the degree of symptoms before and after surgery. Additionally, the postoperative clinical status and MRI-scans were analysed in a subgroup of patients. Nine out of 10 patients were generally satisfied with the obliteration. Most had a significant improvement in their main symptoms and reported a decrease in annual days of missed work and a reduced use of disease-specific drugs. The sense of smell and the intensity of postnasal dripping remained subjectively unchanged. Seventy percent of patients complained about temporary pain at the abdominal donor side. Based on these results, osteoplastic frontal sinus obliteration using abdominal fat seems to be a successful treatment option in patients in whom mucoceles of the frontal sinus are not endoscopically accessible.
    Rhinology 04/2008; 46(1):70-4. · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery: official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons 08/2008; 66(8):1699-707. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2007.11.020 · 1.28 Impact Factor
Show more