Pitch, roll, and yaw variations in patient positioning

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics (Impact Factor: 4.18). 12/2006; 66(3):949-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.055
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To use pretreatment megavoltage-computed tomography (MVCT) scans to evaluate positioning variations in pitch, roll, and yaw for patients treated with helical tomotherapy.
Twenty prostate and 15 head-and-neck cancer patients were selected. Pretreatment MVCT scans were performed before every treatment fraction and automatically registered to planning kilovoltage CT (KVCT) scans by bony landmarks. Image registration data were used to adjust patient setups before treatment. Corrections for pitch, roll, and yaw were recorded after bone registration, and data from fractions 1-5 and 16-20 were used to analyze mean rotational corrections.
For prostate patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) for pitch, roll, and yaw corrections were -0.60 +/- 1.42, 0.66 +/- 1.22, and -0.33 +/- 0.83. In head-and-neck patients, the means and standard deviations (in degrees) were -0.24 +/- 1.19, -0.12 +/- 1.53, and 0.25 +/- 1.42 for pitch, roll, and yaw, respectively. No significant difference in rotational variations was observed between Weeks 1 and 4 of treatment. Head-and-neck patients had significantly smaller pitch variation, but significantly larger yaw variation, than prostate patients. No difference was found in roll corrections between the two groups. Overall, 96.6% of the rotational corrections were less than 4 degrees.
The initial rotational setup errors for prostate and head-and-neck patients were all small in magnitude, statistically significant, but did not vary considerably during the course of radiotherapy. The data are relevant to couch hardware design for correcting rotational setup variations. There should be no theoretical difference between these data and data collected using cone beam KVCT on conventional linacs.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Large fraction radiation therapy offers a shorter course of treatment and radiobiological advantages for prostate cancer treatment. The CyberKnife is an attractive technology for delivering large fraction doses based on the ability to deliver highly conformal radiation therapy to moving targets. In addition to intra-fractional translational motion (left-right, superior-inferior, and anterior-posterior), prostate rotation (pitch, roll, and yaw) can increase geographical miss risk. We describe our experience with six-dimensional (6D) intra-fraction prostate motion correction using CyberKnife stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Eighty-eight patients were treated by SBRT alone or with supplemental external radiation therapy. Trans-perineal placement of four gold fiducials within the prostate accommodated X-ray guided prostate localization and beam adjustment. Fiducial separation and non-overlapping positioning permitted the orthogonal imaging required for 6D tracking. Fiducial placement accuracy was assessed using the CyberKnife fiducial extraction algorithm. Acute toxicities were assessed using Common Toxicity Criteria v3. There were no Grade 3, or higher, complications and acute morbidity was minimal. Ninety-eight percent of patients completed treatment employing 6D prostate motion tracking with intra-fractional beam correction. Suboptimal fiducial placement limited treatment to 3D tracking in two patients. Our experience may guide others in performing 6D correction of prostate motion with CyberKnife SBRT.
    Frontiers in Oncology 12/2011; 1:48. DOI:10.3389/fonc.2011.00048
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of our study is to find the potential best options for the registration selection parameters when performing automatic registration between kilovoltage computed tomography (KVCT) and megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) images in helical tomotherapy. We compared nine different combinations of automatic registration parameters, including technique and resolution in automatic registration control and tomoimage filtering in scan image control. In the phantom study, we compared the translational and the rotational adjustments between the original position (lateral 0 cm; longitudinal 0 cm; vertical 0 cm) and the manually moved position (lateral 1 cm; longitudinal 1 cm; vertical 1 cm). In the patient study, we compared translational (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) and rotational (pitch, roll, yaw) adjustments between the KVCT and the MVCT images for different anatomic treatment sites. The ranges of translational and rotational displacements in the phantom study were 14.87 ± 0.12 ∼ 15.70 ± 0.04 mm and 0° ∼ 1.03 ± 0.58°, respectively. In cranial cases, the ranges of translational and rotational root-mean-square values were 4.3 ± 0.4 mm ∼ 5.3 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.3 ± 0.3° ∼ 0.7 ± 0.4°, respectively. In the extra cranial cases, the ranges of translational and rotational root-mean-square values were 14.1 ± 3.6 mm − 16.1 ± 2.5 mm, and 0.5 ± 0.3° ∼ 1.0 ± 0.5°, respectively. We found that the combination of “full image - super fine” could minimize the mechanical deviations in the cranial case, and that both the combinations of “bone tissue - super fine” and “full image - super fine” were the best options in extra cranial cases.
    Journal- Korean Physical Society 06/2012; 60(11). DOI:10.3938/jkps.60.1961 · 0.43 Impact Factor
  • Source