Article

Ruling out the need for antibiotics - Are we sending the right message?

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Ángeles, California, United States
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.25). 09/2006; 160(9):945-52. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.945
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the relationships among physician-parent communication practices, physicians' perceptions of parental expectations for antibiotic treatment, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral upper respiratory tract infections.
Cross-sectional study of pediatric encounters motivated by cold symptoms between October 1, 2000, and June 30, 2001. Each encounter was videotaped. Physicians completed a postvisit survey that measured whether they perceived the parent as expecting antibiotics. Coded communication variables were merged with survey variables. Multivariate analyses identified key predictors of parent-physician communication practices, physician perceptions of parents' expectations for antibiotics, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral conditions.
Twenty-seven pediatric practices in Los Angeles, Calif.
Thirty-eight pediatricians and 522 consecutively approached parents of children with cold symptoms.
Physicians' perceptions of parental expectations for antibiotics, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, and parental questioning of nonantibiotic treatments.
Physicians were 20.2% more likely to perceive parents as expecting antibiotics when they questioned the physician's treatment plan (P = .004; 95% confidence interval, 6.3%-34.0%). When physicians perceived parents as expecting antibiotics, they were 31.7% more likely to inappropriately prescribe them (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 16.0%-47.3%). Parents were 24.0% more likely to question the treatment plan when the physician ruled out the need for antibiotics (P = .004; 95% confidence interval, 7.7%-40.3%).
Parental questioning of the treatment plan increases physicians' perceptions that antibiotics are expected and thus increases inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Treatment plans that focus on what can be done to make a child feel better, rather than on what is not needed, ie, antibiotics, may decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John Heritage, Aug 21, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
102 Views
  • Source
    • "According to this analysis, communication skills and diagnostic uncertainty rank among the principal indirect factors influencing antibiotic prescription and may provide an attractive basis for improving prescribing practices. Although physicians reported communication skills as a problem in only five of the studies selected [16] [23] [25] [34] [35], we nevertheless believe that, on the basis of complacency, this factor is an attitude related to patient expectations , in line with published papers which show that improvement in physician–patient communication can reduce patient expectations of antibiotic treatment [61] [62]. In the case of diagnostic uncertainty, the current findings suggest that this may have an indirect impact by influencing physicians' attitudes, such as fear or confidence. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Inappropriate prescription has been associated with mounting rates of antibiotic resistance worldwide, demanding more detailed studies into physicians' decision-making process. Accordingly, this study sought to explore physicians' perceptions of factors influencing antibiotic prescribing. A systematic search was performed for qualitative studies focused on understanding physicians' perceptions of the factors, attitudes and knowledge influencing antibiotic prescription. Of the total of 35 papers selected for review purposes, 18 solely included physicians and the remaining 17 also included patients and/or other healthcare providers. Data collection was based mainly on interviews, followed by questionnaires and focus groups, and the methodologies mainly used for data analysis were grounded theory and thematic analysis. Factors cited by physicians as having an impact on antibiotic prescribing were grouped into those that were intrinsic (group 1) and those that were extrinsic (group 2) to the healthcare professional. Among the former, physicians' attitudes, such as complacency or fear, were rated as being most influential on antibiotic prescribing, whilst patient-related factors (e.g. signs and symptoms) or healthcare system-related factors (e.g. time pressure and policies/guidelines implemented) were the most commonly reported extrinsic factors. These findings revealed that: (i) antibiotic prescribing is a complex process influenced by factors affecting all the actors involved, including physicians, other healthcare providers, healthcare system, patients and the general public; and (ii) such factors are mutually dependent. Hence, by shedding new light on the process, these findings will hopefully contribute to generating new and more effective strategies for improving antibiotic prescribing and allaying global concern about antibiotic resistance.
    International journal of antimicrobial agents 11/2012; 41(3). DOI:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2012.09.003 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "D.J. Opel et al. / Vaccine 30 (2012) 1269– 1275 1271 strep " ) has the effect of implicitly conveying a parent's expectation for antibiotics [35]. Two investigators (JR, JH) separately reviewed each videotape using CA to identify recurrent physician practices of communication regarding immunizations and patterns of parent response to those physician practices. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To determine the feasibility of using direct observation of provider-parent immunization discussions and to characterize provider communication practices with vaccine-hesitant parents. Over a 6 month period in 2010, we videotaped immunization discussions between pediatric providers and vaccine-hesitant parents during health supervision visits involving children 2-15 months old (N=24) in the Seattle area, Washington, USA. Videotapes were analyzed using the qualitative method of conversation analysis. We approached 96 parents seen by 9 different providers. Of those who were eligible (N=56), we enrolled 43% (N=24). Four videotaped visits were excluded from analysis for failure to obtain parental HIPAA authorization. Of the remaining 20 visits, there were ≥2 visits each that involved children aged 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months, and all videotaped visits contained at least a brief immunization discussion. We identified 6 communication practices and several behavior types within each practice relevant to immunization: Practice 1, providers' initiations of the topic of vaccination; Types: participatory or presumptive format; Practice 2, parents' responses to providers' topic initiations; Types: strong or weak acceptance or resistance; Practice 3, providers' follow-ups to parent's responses; Types: no, immediate, or delayed pursuit; Practice 4, parents' vaccine-related questions or statements; Types: fact- or concern-based; Practice 5, providers' explicit solicitations of parent's questions/concerns; Types: designed to discourage or encourage discussion; and Practice 6, parents' responses to providers' solicitations of questions/concerns; Types: no question or fact- or concern-based inquiry. Direct observation of immunization discussions in the primary care pediatric setting is feasible and yields insight into several provider-parent immunization communication practices that are worthy of further study to determine which are effective at improving parental acceptance of immunization.
    Vaccine 02/2012; 30(7):1269-75. DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.129 · 3.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A nested cross-sectional design was employed, consisting of 570 videotaped pediatric encounters for children with upper respiratory tract infection symptoms clustered within 38 pediatricians in 27 community pediatric practices around Los Angeles County conducted between October, 2000 and June, 2001. In the course of analyzing the data with regard to how parents and physicians arrive at a treatment decision [18] [19] [20] – the reason for the constraint on URTIs – it became clear that the extent to which children are involved in the encounter varies greatly. A new aim emerged—to identify predictors of child participation in these medical encounters. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of the study is to examine predictors of children answering questions during primary care pediatric visits. Relying on a sample of 322 video-taped community practice encounters, this study identifies predictors of when children answer physicians' questions. Multi-level multivariate regressions were used to model the relationships among communication and socio-demographic variables and whether or not children answered questions pediatricians asked them. Whereas race and education predict whether physicians select children to answer questions, these factors are not associated with whether children answer physicians' questions. Instead, a child's performance is associated with communication practices specific to physician-child interaction such as the grammatical type of question and doctor gaze. Children are less responsive to physicians' questions than their parents but their failure to answer is predictable and thus can be improved. By increasing their participation in the visit, physicians may (a) secure more information about children's health and (b) socialize children to be more pro-active patients. Physicians can improve the likelihood that children will answer their questions by (a) asking them social questions early in the visit, (b) phrasing their questions as yes-no questions, and (c) and directing their gaze at the children during each question.
    Patient Education and Counseling 08/2011; 87(1):3-9. DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.007 · 2.60 Impact Factor
Show more