Article

Ruling out the need for antibiotics - Are we sending the right message?

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Ángeles, California, United States
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Impact Factor: 4.25). 09/2006; 160(9):945-52. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.945
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine the relationships among physician-parent communication practices, physicians' perceptions of parental expectations for antibiotic treatment, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral upper respiratory tract infections.
Cross-sectional study of pediatric encounters motivated by cold symptoms between October 1, 2000, and June 30, 2001. Each encounter was videotaped. Physicians completed a postvisit survey that measured whether they perceived the parent as expecting antibiotics. Coded communication variables were merged with survey variables. Multivariate analyses identified key predictors of parent-physician communication practices, physician perceptions of parents' expectations for antibiotics, and inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for viral conditions.
Twenty-seven pediatric practices in Los Angeles, Calif.
Thirty-eight pediatricians and 522 consecutively approached parents of children with cold symptoms.
Physicians' perceptions of parental expectations for antibiotics, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, and parental questioning of nonantibiotic treatments.
Physicians were 20.2% more likely to perceive parents as expecting antibiotics when they questioned the physician's treatment plan (P = .004; 95% confidence interval, 6.3%-34.0%). When physicians perceived parents as expecting antibiotics, they were 31.7% more likely to inappropriately prescribe them (P<.001; 95% confidence interval, 16.0%-47.3%). Parents were 24.0% more likely to question the treatment plan when the physician ruled out the need for antibiotics (P = .004; 95% confidence interval, 7.7%-40.3%).
Parental questioning of the treatment plan increases physicians' perceptions that antibiotics are expected and thus increases inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Treatment plans that focus on what can be done to make a child feel better, rather than on what is not needed, ie, antibiotics, may decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

1 Follower
 · 
89 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Conversation Analysis has come to be the dominant approach to the systematic study of social interaction. Mixed methods studies combining CA with quantitative methods have been utilized since the 1980s to test associations between interaction practices and sociodemographic variables, attitudinal variables, outcomes, and even factors such as the economy. However, any sort of formal coding risks a massive reduction and flattening of complex human behavior to simplistic codes. Thus, a question arises as to whether it is possible to make use of formal coding in a way that remains true to CA principles about the study of social interaction. In this article, I argue that the formal coding of interaction behavior is not necessarily antithetical to conversation analysis. Although formal coding of interaction is frequently a top-down process that is not grounded in CA, interaction coding can be done in ways that do not sacrifice a CA sensibility and that are true to CA principles. In this article I discuss the aspects of CA methods that form a natural basis for formal coding and then go on to contrast non-CA-grounded formal coding with CA-grounded formal coding. Finally, I review some of the limitations of mixed methods CA formal coding studies of interaction. Data are in American and British English.
    Research on Language and Social Interaction 01/2015; 48(1). DOI:10.1080/08351813.2015.993837 · 1.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: In acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) antibiotic overprescribingleads toantimicrobialresistance and underprescribing may cause poor patient outcomes. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate changes in over- and underprescribing of antibiotics after two interventions to optimise antibiotic prescribing in AECOPD in Spain. Methods:In 2008 and 2009 general practitioners (GPs) registered patients in 3-week periods before and after interventions. Two types of intervention were conducted: GPs in the full-intervention group (FIG) were exposed to a multifaceted intervention and given access to C-reactive protein (CRP) rapidtest; partial-intervention group (PIG) was only exposed to the multifaceted intervention. Overprescribing was defined as antibioticgiven to type III* exacerbation (≤ one Anthonisen Criteria); underprescribing was defined as no antibiotic given totype I exacerbation (three Anthonisen Criteria). A multivariate logistic regression model was used,considering antibiotic prescribing as the dependent variable. Results:A total of 210 GPs and 70 GPs were assigned to FIG and PIG, respectively,and 952 AECOPD patients were eligible for main analysis. After adjusting for clustering at GP level and for patient age and sex, we found that GPs in FIG significantly reduced antibiotic overprescribing; Odds ratio (OR) =0.35 (95%CI: 0.18 to 0.68, P-value =0.003) and underprescribing was not significantly increased; OR =0.25 (95%CI: 0.06 to 1.0, P-value =0.075).No statistically significant changes were found in the PIG. Conclusion:Antibiotic overprescribing wasonly reduced when CRP test was available.Simultaneously, underprescribing was not significantly increased, but this could be due to sample size limitations.
    Family Practice 04/2015; DOI:10.1093/fampra/cmv020 · 1.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Clinicians prescribe antibiotics to over 65% of adults with acute bronchitis despite guidelines stating that antibiotics are not indicated.Methods To identify and understand primary care clinician perceptions about antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 primary care clinicians in Boston, Massachusetts and used thematic content analysis.ResultsAll the participants agreed with guidelines that antibiotics are not indicated for acute bronchitis and felt that clinicians other than themselves were responsible for overprescribing. Barriers to guideline adherence included 6 themes: (1) perceived patient demand, which was the main barrier, although some clinicians perceived a recent decrease; (2) lack of accountability for antibiotic prescribing; (3) saving time and money; (4) other clinicians¿ misconceptions about acute bronchitis; (5) diagnostic uncertainty; and (6) clinician dissatisfaction in failing to meet patient expectations. Strategies to decrease inappropriate antibiotic prescribing included 5 themes: (1) patient educational materials; (2) quality reporting; (3) clinical decision support; (4) use of an over-the-counter prescription pad; and (5) pre-visit triage and education by nurses to prevent visits.Conclusions Clinicians continued to cite patient demand as the main reason for antibiotic prescribing for acute bronchitis, though some clinicians perceived a recent decrease. Clinicians felt that other clinicians were responsible for inappropriate antibiotic prescribing and that better pre-visit triage by nurses could prevent visits and change patients¿ expectations.
    BMC Family Practice 12/2014; 15(1):194. DOI:10.1186/s12875-014-0194-5 · 1.74 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
77 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014