Televised movie trailers - Undermining restrictions on advertising tobacco to youth

Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States
Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (Impact Factor: 5.73). 10/2006; 160(9):885-8. DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.160.9.885
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the proportion of televised movie trailers that included images of tobacco use during 1 year and the extent of youth exposure to those trailers.
Content analysis combined with Nielsen data measuring media exposure. All movie trailers (N = 216) shown on television from August 1, 2001, through July 31, 2002.
Exposure among youth aged 12 to 17 years to televised movie trailers that included smoking imagery.
Of the movie trailers televised during the study period, 14.4% (31 trailers) included images of tobacco use. Tobacco use was shown in 24.0% of the 23 trailers for R-rated (restricted) movies and 7.5% of the 8 trailers for PG-13- and PG-rated (parental guidance) movies. Ninety-five percent of all youth aged 12 to 17 years in the United States saw at least 1 movie trailer depicting tobacco use on television during this 1 year, and 88.8% saw at least 1 of these trailers 3 or more times.
Nearly all US youth aged 12 to 17 years were exposed to images of tobacco use on television in the context of a movie trailer during the study period. Given the relationship between youth exposure to tobacco use in movies and smoking initiation, the public health community should work to enact policy to reduce or eliminate the influence of tobacco use in televised movie trailers.

Download full-text


Available from: Donna M Vallone, Sep 26, 2015
35 Reads
  • Source
    • "This has led some public authorities (e.g., in England and California) to consider requiring films containing smoking scenes to have an adult rating [38]. However, even though such measures have yet to be implemented, they may already need to be adapted given evidence of the use of televised trailers to portray smoking scenes to those who may not be able to view the actual movies legally [39]. A third is the way in which the industry is circumventing measures of packaging. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tobacco control is an area where the translation of evidence into policy would seem to be straightforward, given the wealth of epidemiological, behavioural and other types of research available. Yet, even here challenges exist. These include information overload, concealment of key (industry-funded) evidence, contextualization, assessment of population impact, and the changing nature of the threat. In the context of Israel's health targeting initiative, Healthy Israel 2020, we describe the steps taken to develop a comprehensive tobacco control strategy. We elaborate on the following: a) scientific issues influencing the choice of tobacco control strategies; b) organization of existing evidence of effectiveness of interventions into a manageable form, and c) consideration of relevant philosophical and political issues. We propose a framework for developing a plan and illustrate this process with a case study in Israel. Broad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies. Scientific challenges include integration of complex and sometimes conflicting information from authoritative sources, and lack of estimates of population impact of interventions. Philosophical and political challenges include the use of evidence-based versus innovative policymaking, the importance of individual versus governmental responsibility, and whether and how interventions should be prioritized.The proposed framework includes: 1) compilation of a list of potential interventions 2) modification of that list based on local needs and political constraints; 3) streamlining the list by categorizing interventions into broad groupings of related interventions; together these groupings form the basis of a comprehensive plan; and 4) refinement of the plan by comparing it to existing comprehensive plans. Development of a comprehensive tobacco control plan is a complex endeavour, involving crucial decisions regarding intervention components. "Off the shelf" plans, which need to be adapted to local settings, are available from a variety of sources, and a multitude of individual recommendations are available. The proposed framework for adapting existing approaches to the local social and political climate may assist others planning for smoke-free societies. Additionally, this experience has implications for development of evidence-based health plans addressing other risk factors.
    Health Research Policy and Systems 05/2010; 8(1):17. DOI:10.1186/1478-4505-8-17 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With contributions from David Brake, Jesse Elvin, Rebecca Gooch, Judith Livingstone and Russell Luyt. Key points from the evidence on harm and offence: * Research shows some harmful effects of the media under certain circumstances, with media content being part of a multi-factor explanation of social concerns (violence, sexuality, stereotyping, etc). * Harm and offence must be balanced against a consideration of the benefits of the various media, although this was beyond the scope of the present review. * Much of the available research comes from the US and is based in a different media regulatory environment from that of the UK. In the UK there are specific regulatory systems in place to restrict access to inappropriate content or, in the case of children, to enable parents to regulate their children's consumption of inappropriate material. * The majority of research has been carried out in the field of television but this does not necessarily mean that television has a greater effect. There is some evidence for harm from film and games, but there is little current research into the effects of radio, music or print. There is very little research examining the influence of new media. * The evidence for harm is stronger in relation to children, especially boys and psychologically vulnerable people. Women and older people are more likely to be offended by what they watch. * The types of harm include cognitive (eg stereotypes about others), emotional (eg fear), and behavioural (eg aggressive behaviour). There is more evidence for harm in terms of aggression/violence and it seems to apply across a range of media. * There is less academic research into areas of offence but it is clear that individuals and certain groups find some media content offensive. * A range of factors are found to affect how audiences react to the different media. These include the context of media use (such as viewer choice) as well as editorial issues such as the narrative context in which the content appears or the way in which the characters are drawn. It is unclear how content which does not have these types of framework (such as user-generated content) might affect the audience. * The evidence base remains problematic to some extent, partly because not all researchers agree on the interpretation of the findings, especially for experimental research. There are also ethical and practical problems which prevent certain concerns being researched, for instance the long term effects of viewing violent material or the impact of pornography on children.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Several studies have linked seeing smoking in movies with adolescent smoking, but none have determined how much movie smoking adolescents see. Our aim was to determine exposure to movie smoking in a representative sample of young US adolescents. METHODS. We surveyed 6522 nationally representative US adolescents aged 10-14 years. We content analyzed 534 contemporary box-office hits for movie smoking. Each movie was assigned to a random subsample of adolescents (mean: 613) who were asked whether they had seen the movie. Using survey weights, we estimated the total number of US adolescents who had seen each movie and then multiplied by the number of smoking depictions in each movie to obtain gross smoking impressions seen by adolescents. The 534 movies were mainly rated PG-13 (41%) and R (40%), and 74% contained smoking (3830 total smoking occurrences). On average, each movie was seen by 25% of the adolescents surveyed. Viewership was higher with increased age and lower for R-rated movies. Overall, these movies delivered 13.9 billion gross smoking impressions, an average of 665 to each US adolescent aged 10-14 years. Although this sample's R-rated movies contained 60% of smoking occurrences, they delivered only 39% of smoking impressions because of lower adolescent viewership. Thirty popular movies each delivered > or =100 million gross smoking impressions. Thirty actors each delivered >50 million smoking impressions, such that just 1.5% of actors delivered one quarter of all character smoking to the adolescent sample. Popular movies deliver billions of smoking images and character smoking depictions to young US adolescents. Removing smoking from youth-rated films would substantially reduce exposure from new box-office hits. Furthermore, the popular actors who frequently smoke in movies could have a major impact on adolescent movie smoking exposure by choosing not to portray characters who smoke.
    PEDIATRICS 06/2007; 119(5):e1167-76. DOI:10.1542/peds.2006-2897 · 5.47 Impact Factor
Show more