Experiences and views of specialist registrars in geriatric medicine on 'do not attempt resuscitation' decisions: A sea of uncertainty?

Department of Medicine for Elderly, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, UK.
QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians (Impact Factor: 2.5). 11/2006; 99(10):691-700. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl096
Source: PubMed


Recent cultural changes place doctors under increasing pressure to work with their patients to reach decisions about end-of-life care.
To survey the experience, practice and opinions of specialist registrars (SPRs) in geriatric medicine regarding 'do not attempt resuscitation' (DNAR) decisions.
Postal questionnaire survey.
A questionnaire was mailed to all members registered as trainees (n = 408) with the British Geriatrics Society in November 2003; a reminder was sent nine weeks later. Responses were analysed using both quantitative and qualitative (thematic) approaches.
Response rate was 62% (251/408), of whom 235 were still SpRs. Respondents played a major role in DNAR decision-making in their day-to-day clinical practice. Over a third of respondents did not feel that locally available guidelines were helpful. More than half sometimes disagreed with their consultants' decision, and a fifth were concerned about the possibility of complaints regarding the decisions they made. The majority felt uncomfortable discussing the issue with the patient, and were more likely to discuss the issue with relatives than with patients.
Further support and training may improve confidence and positive experiences in relation to DNAR decision-making among training-grade doctors in the UK.

Download full-text


Available from: Phyo K Myint, Oct 09, 2015
27 Reads
  • Source
    QJM: monthly journal of the Association of Physicians 11/2006; 99(10):711-5. DOI:10.1093/qjmed/hcl097 · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A number of studies have explored doctors' views and experiences of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but to our knowledge there has been no research to identify the information that doctors take into account when they make decisions about CPR. To investigate factors that influence decisions about CPR. Qualitative study involving six focus groups with 17 doctors and four medical students in Leicester, UK. Doctors and medical students considered a number of factors important when making decisions about CPR-namely, the patient's diagnosis, prognosis, age, quality of life, the opinions of doctors and other medical staff, and the wishes of patients and relevant others. The relative importance of each of these factors varied significantly and was influenced by the doctors' own beliefs and values. Doctors would benefit from greater support for their decision making in relation to resuscitation to reduce variability in clinical practice and to promote appropriate patient care. Identification of factors that influence doctors' individual beliefs, attitudes and values towards resuscitation and improvement in the quality of patient communication may help to guide policy in this area.
    Postgraduate medical journal 11/2009; 85(1009):564-8. DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2009.079491 · 1.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There has been a dramatic change in the way that resuscitation decisions are made for older hospital inpatients in the UK. In less than 20 years many geriatric medicine wards have moved from an "opt-in" policy (where the default position is not to provide resuscitation) to a position where resuscitation is widely available to older patients and clinicians are much more reluctant to make "do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation" decisions on medical grounds alone. The drivers for this change are rooted in societal changes rather than scientific or legal advances. Older patients are increasingly educated and have higher expectations of health care, while doctors are more commonly criticised and have progressively less "power" in the doctor-patient relationship. Doctors in the UK are struggling with the growing volume and complexity of guidelines about resuscitation, which can prove very tricky to enact within current resources and priorities. Many are feeling stressed and under equipped to cope with the ethical and legal dilemmas of resuscitation decision making. The solution lies in better undergraduate and postgraduate training which enhances skills (such as consultation skills and ethical reasoning) and not just knowledge of laws, principles and guidelines.
    Postgraduate medical journal 11/2009; 85(1009):569-72. DOI:10.1136/pgmj.2009.082990 · 1.45 Impact Factor
Show more