Neuropsychological and neurobehavioral correlates of aggression following traumatic brain injury

Swansea University, Swansea, Wales, UK.
Journal of Neuropsychiatry (Impact Factor: 2.77). 02/2006; 18(3):333-41. DOI: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18.3.333
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This study aimed to establish the neuropsychological and neurobehavioral profile of individuals who develop aggression following traumatic brain injury. In a prospective cohort study, 134 brain-injured individuals who exhibited aggression were compared to 153 individuals who had sustained comparable injuries but were not aggressive. In the aggressive group, specific deficits were identified in verbal memory and visuo-perceptual skills. Compared to normative data, this group had impaired executive-attention function. It is tentatively suggested that significant impairment in verbal memory and visuospatial abilities against a background of diminished executive-attention functioning is associated with the development of aggression after brain injury, especially when other risk factors such as low premorbid IQ, low socioeconomic status, and male gender are present.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Although previous research has provided some indication of the association of alexithymia and burnout, this is the first study exploring the association of these two variables in a sample of relatives of individuals who have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI). Objective: To explore the degree to which relatives experience burnout and the extent to which alexithymia acts as a pre-disposing factor, controlling for depression and coping strategies. Method: Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services, Estonian COPE Dispositional Inventory and Beck Depression Inventory-II were completed by 60 relatives of patients with TBI drawn from a tertiary head injury clinic population. Results: Levels of emotional exhaustion, reduced personal accomplishment and depression were significantly higher in the sub-group of relatives with alexithymia than in the sub-group of relatives without alexithymia. Difficulty describing feelings and externally oriented thinking style were significant predictors of emotional exhaustion, while difficulty identifying feelings and difficulty describing feelings were important predictors of depersonalization. Conclusions: Relatives who present with alexithymia need to be identified at an early stage to minimize risks of burnout leading to adverse effects on patient-caregiver relationships.
    Brain Injury 06/2014; DOI:10.3109/02699052.2014.919538 · 1.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Primary objective: To explore the relationships between verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviour following acquired brain injury. Research design: Multivariate statistical modelling of observed verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviour utilizing demographic, pre-morbid, injury-related and neurocognitive predictors. Methods and procedures: Clinical records of 152 participants with acquired brain injury were reviewed, providing an important data set as disordered behaviours had been recorded at the time of occurrence with the Brain Injury Rehabilitation Trust (BIRT) Aggression Rating Scale and complementary measures of inappropriate sexual behaviour. Three behavioural components (verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviour) were identified and subjected to separate logistical regression modelling in a sub-set of 77 participants. Main outcomes and results: Successful modelling was achieved for both verbal and physical aggression (correctly classifying 74% and 65% of participants, respectively), with use of psychotropic medication and poorer verbal function increasing the odds of aggression occurring. Pre-morbid history of aggression predicted verbal but not physical aggression. No variables predicted inappropriate sexual behaviour. Conclusions: Verbal aggression, physical aggression and inappropriate sexual behaviour following acquired brain injury appear to reflect separate clinical phenomena rather than general behavioural dysregulation. Clinical markers that indicate an increased risk of post-injury aggression were not related to inappropriate sexual behaviour.
    Brain Injury 08/2013; 27(10). DOI:10.3109/02699052.2013.804200 · 1.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can give rise to a variety of neuropsychiatric syndromes. The objective of this review is to describe the neurobiological mechanisms that have been proposed to underlie many of these post-TBI syndromes, explore the utility of various investigative modalities and review the mechanisms of treatment available for them. Methods: Six authors reviewed PubMed and Ovid literature that addressed TBI in the context of the neuropsychiatric sequelae, evaluation and management. Results: Depressed mood, anxiety, impulsive/aggressive behaviour, impaired memory and sleep disturbances are among the most prevalent sequelae of severe TBI. Delirium, while less common, can also result from TBI, predisposing individuals to other psychiatric conditions, while psychosis, usually presenting with atypical features, is relatively rare. The evaluation of the brain following TBI has often relied on traditional structural imaging which, according to recent studies, is less sensitive than chemical and functional neuroimaging. A variety of pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments have been investigated with varying degrees of success in managing the spectrum of post-TBI psychiatric illnesses. Conclusions: Neuropsychiatric sequelae are common following TBI. Several of these syndromes are amenable to treatment. Further investigations are required, however, to better understand the mechanistic aetiology of these conditions and the effectiveness of various therapeutic modalities.
    Brain Injury 07/2013; 27(7-8):767-74. DOI:10.3109/02699052.2013.793396 · 1.51 Impact Factor