A Practical Physicians' Guide to the Medicare Drug Benefit Plan
Division of General Internal Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York 10029, USA. Mayo Clinic Proceedings
(Impact Factor: 6.26).
10/2006; 81(9):1217-21. DOI: 10.4065/81.9.1217
Recent commentaries on Medicare Part D highlight both the early failings and the successes of the program. However, regardless of one's opinions about the program, Part D is a reality that millions of Medicare beneficiaries must address now and in the future. The ultimate economic, policy, and clinical success of the Medicare drug benefit plan depends on its transparency and ability to be navigated together by patients, physicians, and other parties. Although Medicare Part D is likely to evolve considerably in the future, it will continue to present elderly adults with numerous plan options and rules and therefore present persistent challenges for patients and physicians. By focusing on a few crucial aspects of Part D and taking advantage of available resources, physicians can simplify Part D for their patients, help them make informed decisions about enrollment and plan selection, and possibly help them save money with their current PDP. This may, in turn, reduce beneficiaries' out-of-pocket prescription costs, thereby improving patients' access to medications and possibly their medication adherence and health outcomes as well.
Available from: PubMed Central
- "Out-of-pocket expenses comprise up to 20% of health care costs in the U.S. . While physicians can play an important role in reducing out-of-pocket drug cost burden for their Medicare Part D patients [6-8], studies suggest that patients and physicians communicate infrequently about out-of-pocket costs [5,7,9,10] and that this communication occurs less often than either of them would like [5,7,8]. "
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Little is known about drug cost communications of Medicare Part D beneficiaries with chronic conditions such as diabetes. The purpose of this study is to assess Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes' levels of communication with physicians regarding prescription drug costs; the perceived importance of these communications; levels of prescription drug switching due to cost; and self-reported cost-related medication non-adherence.
Data were obtained from a cross-sectional survey (58% response rate) of 1,458 Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes who entered the coverage gap in 2006; adjusted percentages of patients with communication issues were obtained from multivariate regression analyses adjusting for patient demographics and clinical characteristics.
Fewer than half of patients reported discussing the cost of medications with their physicians, while over 75% reported that such communications were important. Forty-eight percent reported their physician had switched to a less expensive medication due to costs. Minorities, females, and older adults had significantly lower levels of communication with their physicians regarding drug costs than white, male, and younger patients respectively. Patients with < $25 K annual household income were more likely than higher income patients to have talked about prescription drug costs with doctors, and to report cost-related non-adherence (27% vs. 17%, p < .001).
Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes who entered the coverage gap have low levels of communication with physicians about drug costs, despite the high perceived importance of such communication. Understanding patient and plan-level characteristics differences in communication and use of cost-cutting strategies can inform interventions to help patients manage prescription drug costs.
BMC Health Services Research 06/2010; 10(1):164. DOI:10.1186/1472-6963-10-164 · 1.71 Impact Factor
Disease Management and Health Outcomes 02/2007; 15(2):69-71. DOI:10.2165/00115677-200715020-00001 · 0.35 Impact Factor
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 07/2007; 55(7):1106-1109. DOI:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01286.x · 4.57 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.