Gender, Treatment and Self-Help in Remission from Alcohol Use Disorders

Center for Health Care Evaluation, Department of Veterans Affairs and Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94025, USA.
Clinical Medicine &amp Research 10/2006; 4(3):163-74. DOI: 10.3121/cmr.4.3.163
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To examine gender differences in the influence of treatment, self-help groups and life context and coping factors on remission among initially untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders.
A naturalistic study in which individuals were assessed at baseline and 1, 8 and 16 years later.
Participants initiated help-seeking with the alcoholism service system by contacting an information and referral service or detoxification program.
A total of 461 individuals with alcohol use disorders (50% women).
Participants were assessed by mail surveys and telephone interviews on participation in professional treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), alcohol-related functioning and indices of life context and coping.
Compared to men, women were more likely to participate in treatment and AA, and to experience better alcohol-related and life context outcomes. In general, women and men who participated in treatment and/or AA for a longer duration were more likely to achieve remission. However, women benefited somewhat more than men from extended participation in AA. Continuing depression and reliance on avoidance coping were more closely associated with lack of remission among men than among women.
Compared to men, women with alcohol use disorders were more likely to obtain help and achieve remission. Women tended to benefit more from continued participation in AA and showed greater reductions in depression and avoidance coping than men did. These findings identify specific targets for clinical interventions that appear to be especially beneficial for women and that may also enhance the likelihood of recovery among men.

Download full-text


Available from: Christine Timko, Oct 02, 2014
11 Reads
  • Source
    • "We purposely separated number of meetings attended from AA involvement to see how the two compared in our longitudinal models. Neither of these measures addresses duration or pattern of attendance, known correlates of AA participation and outcomes (Moos et al., 2006 "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Given the widespread use of Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) and other similar groups in the United States and the increasing membership of women, this study compares women with men on their meeting attendance and AA-prescribed behaviors, factors associated with that AA participation, and tests how these relate to women's and men's abstinence across time. All consecutive new admissions (age ≥ 18) from county-wide public and private treatment programs representing the larger population of treatment seekers were approached to be in the study at treatment entry. Those consenting at baseline (n = 926) were sought for follow-up interviews 1, 3, 5, and 7 years later. Generalized linear models were used to test whether various help-seeking factors were associated with AA participation differentially by gender and, controlling for AA and other confounders, whether women differ from men on abstinence. At each follow-up interview, women and men attended AA at similar rates and similarly practiced specific AA behaviors, and they were alike on most factors associated with AA participation and abstention across time including abstinence goal, drink volume, negative consequences, prior treatment, and encouragement to reduce drinking. Relative to men, women with higher drug severity were less likely to participate in AA. Although higher AA participation was a predictor of abstinence for both genders, men were less likely to be abstinent across time. Men were also more likely to reduce their AA participation across time. These findings add to an emerging literature on how women compare with men on factors related to AA participation and subsequent drinking outcomes across time. Findings have clinical implications for service providers referring clients to such groups.
    Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research 06/2011; 35(12):2231-41. DOI:10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01573.x · 3.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Women in the present study were more likely than men to change risky alcohol and drug behaviours. This finding is consistent with other studies [22-24] reporting better treatment results in women with alcohol problems. However, a problem in the present sample is the low numbers of risky alcohol and drug habit levels, resulting in a probable risk of not detecting significant differences in change. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Co-morbidity with substance use disorders negatively influences overall functioning in patients with psychosis. However, frequencies and courses of risky use of alcohol, drugs and cigarettes are rarely investigated in patients at psychosis units. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of alcohol, drugs and cigarettes in patients at a psychosis unit over a 1 1/2 year period after them having taken part in a screening investigation including a feed-back of the results to personnel. Relationships with sex and age are also described. The patients' use of the substances was examined at baseline and at follow-up using three self-reporting instruments: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) and Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND). One hundred and eighty-six patients out of 238 at baseline (78 percent) took part in the follow-up. Total AUDIT score decreased in women. Older men more often developed a risky alcohol use. Older women tended to reduce their risky drug habits. On a group level the habits mostly were stable, but 11 percent changed their alcohol habits and 15 percent changed their smoking habits from risky to no/low risky use, or vice versa. Nine percent changed their drug habits, predominantly from risky to no/low risky use. A more active approach towards alcohol, drug and smoking habits in psychosis units would probably be beneficial.
    BMC Psychiatry 02/2007; 7(1):31. DOI:10.1186/1471-244X-7-31 · 2.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more