Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy with Concomitant Small Field Boost Irradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Phase II Study (KROG 04-01)

Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea.
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (Impact Factor: 3.75). 11/2006; 49(11):1684-91. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-006-0678-z
Source: PubMed


This study was designed to determine the effect of concomitant small field boost irradiation given during preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.
The study prospectively enrolled 38 patients scheduled for preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Pelvic radiotherapy of 43.2 Gy/24 fractions was delivered and boost radiotherapy of 7.2 Gy/12 fractions was concomitantly administered during the latter half of the pelvic radiotherapy treatment period. Two cycles of a bolus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin injection in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy were administered. The median time to surgery after completion of chemoradiotherapy was six weeks. Tumor responses to chemoradiotherapy were assessed by using magnetic resonance volumetry and post-chemoradiotherapy pathology tests to determine tumor downstaging and tumor regression rate.
Thirty-six of 38 patients (94.7 percent) underwent the scheduled surgery. The mean tumor volume reduction rate was 70.3 percent, and the clinical response rate was 66.7 percent. The downstaging rates were 41.7 percent for T classification, 85.2 percent for N classification, and 72.2 percent for stage. Tumor regression grades after preoperative chemoradiotherapy were Grade 1 in 5 patients (13.9 percent), Grade 2 in 24 patients (66.7 percent), Grade 3 in 3 patients (8.3 percent), and Grade 4 in 4 patients (11.1 percent). Ten patients (26.3 percent) experienced > or = Grade 3 acute toxicity.
Our data suggest that concomitant boost irradiation does not improve clinical outcomes compared with other published preoperative chemoradiotherapy regimens. In addition, the clinicians choosing to use concomitant small field boost irradiation should be cautious to minimize the risk of unplanned sphincter ablation.

Download full-text


Available from: Taek-Keun Nam, Oct 04, 2015
14 Reads
  • Source
    • "Nonetheless, some studies concerning innovative RT methods have been done to enhance the efficacy or to decrease the toxicity. Kim et al. [49] treated 38 LARC patients preoperatively with pelvic RT of 43.2 Gy/24 fractions, and a boost treatment with 7.2 Gy/12 fractions was administered concomitantly during the latter half of pelvic RT. This modified RT fractionation was designed to shorten the treatment period and, thus, escalate the effective dose. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Even in patients undergoing an optimal surgical technique (e.g., total mesorectal excision), radiotherapy provides a significant benefit in the local control of rectal cancer. Compared with postoperative treatment, chemoradiotherapy given preoperatively has been shown to decrease local recurrence rates and toxicity. Additionally, preoperative chemoradiotherapy permits the early identification of tumor responses to this cytotoxic treatment by surgical pathology. Pathological parameters reflecting the tumor response to chemoradiotherapy have been shown to be surrogate markers for long-term clinical outcomes. Post-chemoradiotherapy downstaging from cStage II-III to ypStage 0-I indicates a favorable prognosis, with no difference between ypStage 0 and ypStage I. Research is ongoing to develop useful tools (clinical, molecular, and radiological) for clinical determination of the pathologic chemoradiotherapeutic response before surgery, and possibly even before preoperative treatment. In the future, risk-adapted strategies, including intensification of preoperative therapy, conservative surgery, or the selective administration of postoperative chemotherapy, will be realized for locally-advanced rectal cancer patients based on their response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology 08/2012; 28(4):179-87. DOI:10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.179
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to evaluate anal sphincter preservation rates, survival rates, and prognostic factors in patients with rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy.
    The Journal of the Korean Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 01/2008; 26(4). DOI:10.3857/jkstro.2008.26.4.247
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate, in a comparative analysis, the prognostic implications of postchemoradiotherapy (post-CRT) pathologic stage (ypStage) vs. postoperative pathologic stage (pStage) in rectal cancer. Between May 2001 and December 2006, 487 patients with T3 mid or distal rectal cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Concurrent CRT was administered preoperatively (n = 364, 74.7%) or postoperatively (n = 123, 25.3%). The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions. All patients underwent a total mesorectal excision and received adjuvant chemotherapy. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences in DFS, stratified by ypStage and pStage, were compared using the log-rank test. For surviving patients, the median follow-up period was 68 months (range, 12-105 months). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate was not different, at 95.3% and 92.1% in preoperative and postoperative CRT groups, respectively (p = 0.402), but the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was significantly different, at 81.6% (preoperative CRT) vs. 65.4% (postoperative CRT; p = 0.001). The 5-year DFS rate of 78.8% in the preoperative CRT group was significantly better than the 63.0% rate in the postoperative CRT group (p = 0.002). Post-CRT pathologic Stage 0-I occurred in 42.6% (155 of 364) of the patients with preoperative CRT. The 5-year DFS rates were 90.2% (ypStage 0-I), 83.5% (ypStage II), 77.3% (pStage II), 58.6% (ypStage III), and 54.7% (pStage III). The DFS rate of ypStage 0-I was significantly better than that of ypStage II or pStage II. Post-CRT pathologic Stage II and III had similar DFS, compared with pStage II and III, respectively. Disease-free survival predicted by each ypStage was similar to that predicted by the respective pStage. Improved DFS with preoperative vs. postoperative CRT was associated with the ypStage 0-I group that showed a similarly favorable outcome to pStage I rectal cancer.
    International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics 02/2011; 82(2):856-62. DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.079 · 4.26 Impact Factor
Show more