Costs of refractive correction of distance vision impairment in the United States, 1999-2002.
ABSTRACT Correctable vision impairment caused by refractive error is common in the United States population. We estimated the direct costs of providing eyeglasses to all Americans (age> or =12) who need refractive correction to achieve good distance vision.
Cross-sectional study of a nationally representative sample of United States citizens.
Participants in the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), age > or = 12 years. The NHANES examines a nationally representative sample of the U.S. noninstitutionalized, civilian population.
Presenting and corrected visual acuity data were obtained using an autorefractor from 13,211 (93.0%) of the 14,203 participants who visited the NHANES Mobile Examination Center in 1999 through 2002. Need for refractive correction was defined by current use of corrective lenses for distance vision, improvement to good visual acuity following autorefractor correction (using several cutpoints to define good visual acuity), or both.
Estimates of direct cost for refractive correction (1 pair of complete eyeglasses and a refraction examination) were computed based on Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services fee schedules for 2000 and also based on expenditure data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.
The NHANES results indicate that >110 million Americans could or do achieve normal vision with refractive correction. The annual direct cost of correcting distance vision impairment is at least $3.8 billion. Of this amount, $780 million represents the annual cost of providing distance vision correction for persons > age 65.
Correctable vision impairment due to refractive error is common in the United States population. These cost estimates provide useful information for public health endeavors aimed at provision of refractive correction to those who need it.
- SourceAvailable from: James Loughman[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The economic burden of uncorrected refractive error (URE) is thought to be high in Mozambique, largely as a consequence of the lack of resources and systems to tackle this largely avoidable problem. The Mozambique Eyecare Project (MEP) has established the first optometry training and human resource deployment initiative to address the burden of URE in Lusophone Africa. The nature of the MEP programme provides the opportunity to determine, using Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA), whether investing in the establishment and delivery of a comprehensive system for optometry human resource development and public sector deployment is economically justifiable for Lusophone Africa.BMC Health Services Research 09/2014; 14(1):422. · 1.66 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Resources devoted to the development of burden-of-disease studies detract from much needed cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit studies. Practitioners need to help funders of burden-of-disease projects recognize the potential of all tools of decision analysis and economic evaluation in improving the efficiency and equity for the health care system.PharmacoEconomics 08/2014; 32(12). · 3.34 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To determine ocular optical parameters that affect axial length elongation in myopic children undergoing overnight orthokeratology.Ophthalmology 09/2014; · 6.17 Impact Factor