Article

The Prevalence of Distal and Proximal Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients Awaiting Lung Transplantation

Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0790, USA.
Annals of Surgery (Impact Factor: 7.19). 11/2006; 244(4):491-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000237757.49687.03
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To determine the prevalence and proximal extent of gastroesophageal reflux (GERD) in patients awaiting lung transplantation.
GERD has been postulated to contribute to accelerated graft failure in patients who have had lung transplantations. However, the prevalence of reflux symptoms, esophageal motility abnormalities, and proximal esophageal reflux among patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting lung transplantation are unknown.
A total of 109 patients with end-stage lung disease awaiting lung transplantation underwent symptomatic assessment, esophageal manometry, and esophageal pH monitoring (using a probe with 2 sensors located 5 and 20 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter).
Reflux symptoms were not predictive of the presence of reflux (sensitivity, 67%; specificity, 26%). Esophageal manometry showed a high prevalence of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (55%) and impaired esophageal peristalsis (47%) among patients with reflux. Distal reflux was present in 68% of patients and proximal reflux was present in 37% of patients.
These data show that in patients with end-stage lung disease: 1) symptoms were insensitive and nonspecific for diagnosing reflux; 2) esophageal motility was frequently abnormal; 3) 68% of patients had GERD; 4) in 50% of the patients with GERD, acid refluxed into the proximal esophagus. We conclude that patients with end-stage lung disease should be screened with pH monitoring for GERD.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Charles W Hoopes, Aug 14, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
88 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The association between gastroesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis has not been fully characterized. The aims of this study were to determine in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (1) the prevalence of reflux symptoms, (2) the esophageal manometric profile, and (3) the prevalence of proximal and distal esophageal reflux. Between May 1999 and March 2006, 30 patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis were referred to the Swallowing Center at the University of California San Francisco. Each patient underwent a structured symptom assessment, esophageal manometry, and 24-hour dual sensor ambulatory pH monitoring. Twenty (67%) patients had abnormal esophageal reflux. Typical reflux symptoms, although more common in those with reflux, were not reliable as a screening test (sensitivity 65%, specificity 71%). Sixty-five percent of patients with abnormal reflux had a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter. Abnormal esophageal peristalsis was more common among those with reflux (50% vs 10%; P = .03). In 9 (30%) patients, acid refluxed into the proximal esophagus for over 1% of the study time. A majority of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis have pathologic reflux. Symptoms do not distinguish between those with and without reflux. In these patients, reflux is associated with a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter and abnormal esophageal peristalsis, and often extends into the proximal esophagus.
    The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery 05/2007; 133(4):1078-84. DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.085 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: More than 50 years have passed since Rudolf Nissen astutely noticed the effects of his gastroplication on prevention of gastroesophageal reflux. Much progress has been made in understanding the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Antireflux surgery is an important component of the treatment options, applicable in 10% to 15% of patients with symptoms of GERD. Its application, however, is more complex than meets the eye. Considerable judgment in patient selection, careful preoperative evaluation, appropriate selection of the ideal procedure, and proper surgical technique are required to achieve a high degree of success. The data reviewed here show that when these factors are present, outcomes are reproducible and excellent. Recent clinical research focusing on the physiology of fundoplication, symptom control, patient satisfaction, and the postoperative quality of life have taught us much, as has the careful analysis of complications and surgical failures. We anticipate that advances in our understanding of GERD will continue to enable clinicians to treat this disease with increasing effectiveness and efficiency.
    Current GERD Reports 11/2007; 1(4):233-240. DOI:10.1007/s12171-007-0023-z
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Gastroesophageal reflux is associated with lung transplantation (LT) and bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, limiting allograft functional longevity. LT patients may also develop post-operative oropharyngeal dysphagia, exposing the allograft to further risk. However, the magnitude of this problem is unknown. We examined LT recipients post-operatively for swallowing disorders and correlated findings with pre- and post-operative variables. Two hundred sixty-three LT patients (January 2001 to July 2005) at a single center were retrospectively reviewed. Each underwent clinical swallowing assessment. Provocative swallowing evaluation (SE) was performed in 149 patients (Group 1); 114 patients did not receive formal SE (Group 2). SE studies were considered positive with laryngeal penetration (PEN) or tracheal aspiration (ASP) of thin liquids. Groups were compared with respect to pre-, peri- and post-operative variables using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. After LT, 56.7% of patients underwent post-operative SE (mean 19 +/- 20 days), most of whom (87.9%) had fiber-optic endoscopic studies. SE was positive for PEN or ASP in 70.5% (n = 105). Aspiration occurred in 63.8% (n = 67) of positive SEs; 77.6% (n = 52) of ASP assessments were clinically silent. Pre-operative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and post-operative complications, including vocal cord paresis, pleural processes, venous thromboses and severe rejection episodes, were more common among Group 1. Group 2 had a significantly reduced hospital length of stay (p = 0.004). Prospective SE identified strikingly high rates of dysphagia after LT. Because many of these deficits are silent, aggressive pulmonary toilet is especially important after post-operative LT. Pre-operative SE may clarify those at increased risk for new-onset oropharyngeal dysphagia after LT.
    The Journal of heart and lung transplantation: the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation 12/2007; 26(11):1144-8. DOI:10.1016/j.healun.2007.07.038 · 5.61 Impact Factor