Productivity and turnover in PCPs: the role of staff participation in decision-making.

Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Medical Care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 11/2006; 44(10):946-51. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000220828.43049.32
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Efforts to redesign primary care practices are beginning to address how decisions are made in the practice setting. This study contributes to these efforts by examining associations between staff participation in decision-making, productivity, and turnover in primary care practices. The study is informed by organizational theories of participation that emphasize cognitive and affective influences on employee output and behavior.
This research used data collected from primary care practices involved in a national initiative sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Cross-sectional survey data on organizational structures and attributes among 49 practices were analyzed. Regression analysis was used to examine associations among practice productivity, staff participation in decision-making, and formal structures such as staff meetings. Associations between staff turnover and participative decision-making were also examined.
Staff participation in decisions regarding quality improvement, practice change, and clinical operations was positively associated with practice productivity, whereas formal structures such as staff meetings were not. In addition, higher levels of participation in decision-making were associated with reduced turnover among nonclinicians and administrative staff.
Examination of organizational features is increasingly recognized as a key to improving primary care performance. Study findings suggest that one important strategy may be implementation of a participative model emphasizing greater staff involvement in practice decisions. This may enhance information-sharing, work satisfaction, and commitment to organizational decisions, all of which can lead to beneficial outcomes such as increased productivity and stability in primary care practices.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Network for the Improvement of Addiction Treatment (NIATx) promotes treatment access and retention through a customer-focused quality improvement model. This paper explores the issue of the "business case" for quality improvement in addiction treatment from the provider's perspective. The business case model developed in this paper is based on case examples of early NIATx participants coupled with a review of the literature. Process inefficiencies indicated by long waiting times, high no-show rates, and low continuation rates cause underutilization of capacity and prevent optimal financial performance. By adopting customer-focused practices aimed at removing barriers to treatment access and retention, providers may be able to improve financial performance, increase staff retention, and gain long-term strategic advantage.
    The Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 09/2011; 39(1):91-100. · 0.78 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study describes a response to eight tragic deaths over an eighteen month times span on a fast track construction project on the largest commercial development project in U.S. history. Four versions of a survey were distributed to workers, foremen, superintendents, and senior management. In addition to standard Likert-scale safety climate scale items, an open-ended item was included at the end of the survey. Safety climate perceptions differed by job level. Specifically, management perceived a more positive safety climate as compared to workers. Content analysis of the open-ended item was used to identify important safety and health concerns which might have been overlooked with the qualitative portion of the survey. The surveys were conducted to understand workforce issues of concern with the aim of improving site safety conditions. Such efforts can require minimal investment of resources and time and result in critical feedback for developing interventions affecting organizational structure, management processes, and communication. The most important lesson learned was that gauging differences in perception about site safety can provide critical feedback at all levels of a construction organization. IMPACT ON THE INDUSTRY: Implementation of multi-level organizational perception surveys can identify major safety issues of concern. Feedback, if acted upon, can potentially result in fewer injuries and fatal events.
    Journal of safety research 06/2010; 41(3):263-81. · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The patient-centered medical home model of primary care requires increased collaboration in care delivery. Recent studies suggest that such a collaborative model of care is aided by physician leaders who practice an inclusive approach to leadership; however, they do not empirically demonstrate what such strategies look like in primary care settings, nor do they provide insights to help physician leaders capitalize on the benefits of such an approach. Our analysis offers extended case illustrations of 3 physician leadership behaviors that exemplify leadership inclusiveness (explicitly soliciting team input; engaging in participatory decision making; and facilitating the inclusion of non-team members) as well as 3 behaviors that are counter to inclusiveness. These 6 cases emerged from our analysis of 8 primary care practices that participated in a 3-month facilitated, team-based quality improvement intervention that encouraged leadership inclusiveness. Qualitative data include observational field notes, interviews, and audio-recorded quality improvement meetings. Through these exemplar and nonexemplar cases, we highlight successes and challenges physicians experienced in their collaborative attempts. Such insights may prove important to physicians, researchers, and policy makers alike as they determine how best to aid physician leaders who are being challenged to recreate themselves as facilitators of collaboration.
    Quality management in health care 07/2012; 21(3):135-45.