Improving operating room efficiency through process redesign

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Surgery (Impact Factor: 3.38). 10/2006; 140(4):509-14; discussion 514-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.06.018
Source: PubMed


Operating rooms (ORs) are important resources for patient care and revenue, yet a significant portion of OR time is taken up by nonoperative activities. We hypothesized that redesigning the process that occurs between operations would lead to a decrease in nonoperative time (NOT = room turnover time plus anesthesia induction and emergence time).
Following a 3-month multidisciplinary planning process, a prospective study to reduce NOT was initiated in 2 of 17 ORs at a tertiary care academic medical center. Unlike previous reports, which have limited the number of participants, we constructed a process that was restricted only by case duration. The plan focused on minimizing nonoperative tasks in the OR, effecting parallel performance of activities, and reducing nonclinical disruptions. Eligible cases were those with an estimated operative time of 2 hours or less. A target NOT of 35 minutes was established. Cases of similar duration in the remaining ORs served as a concurrent control group.
Twenty-three surgeons, 13 anesthesiologists, and 11 nurses worked in the project ORs over a 3-month period. Residents participated in all cases. There was a significant reduction in NOT (42.2 +/- 12.9 vs 65 +/- 21.7 minutes), turnover time (26.4 +/- 11.2 vs 42.8 +/- 21.7 minutes), and anesthesia-related time (16.9 vs 21.9 minutes, all P < .001) in the project rooms compared with cases of similar duration in control ORs. Process-related delays were identified in 70% of cases when NOT exceeded the 35-minute target.
These results demonstrate that a coordinated multidisciplinary process redesign can significantly reduce NOT. This process is applicable to most ORs and has optimal benefit for cases of 2 hours or less in duration. The high percentage of residual process-related delays suggests that further improvements can be anticipated.

Full-text preview

Available from:
  • Source
    • "Once the earlier patient is moved outside the OR (e.g., to the recovery room), the newly anaesthetised patient is ready to be transferred to the OR. Conducting anaesthesia induction in a separate room can save time for preparing the OR before surgery, thereby improving OR efficiency (Harders et al., 2006). From a BPM viewpoint, it is advantageous to perform the anaesthesia induction on the trolley where: a. there is an anaesthesia room adjacent to the OR; and b. there is another patient in the OR. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The present study brings together for the first time the techniques of hierarchical task analysis (HTA), human error identification (HEI), and business process management (BPM) to select practices that can eliminate or reduce potential errors in a surgical setting. We applied the above approaches to the improvement of the patient positioning process for lumbar spine surgery referred to as 'direct lateral interbody fusion' (DLIF). Observations were conducted to gain knowledge on current DLIF positioning practices, and an HTA was constructed. Potential errors associated with the practices specific to DLIF patient positioning were identified. Based on literature review and expert views alternative practices are proposed aimed at improving the DLIF patient positioning process. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to use BPM in association with HEI/HTA for the purpose of improving the performance and safety of a surgical process - with promising results.
    Applied ergonomics 12/2013; 45(4). DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.11.013 · 2.02 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "By moving care tasks outside the OR while the previous surgery is being completed, non-operative time be decreased and an additional surgery be scheduled for OR block time (Friedman et al., 2006; Hanss et al., 2005; Harders et al., 2006; Sandberg et al., 2005; "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The high variability in the required operating room (OR) time of open heart surgeries with approximately four and a half hours average overall duration is the main challenge in managing OR utilisation. We evaluate, with a discrete-event simulation model, how three different process changes – a four-day OR week, better accuracy in OR time forecasting and having anaesthesia induction take place outside the OR – impact on cost-efficiency in the OR that is dedicated for open heart surgeries. Doing anaesthesia induction outside the OR has the biggest potential effect on the average OR cost per patient. The paper provides new information about the effects of multi-intervention changes on OR cost per patient in open heart surgery.
    International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management 01/2008; 9(1). DOI:10.1504/IJHTM.2008.016848
  • Source

Show more