Aesthetic labia minora reduction with inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction.

Abstract

Aesthetic surgery of female genitalia is an uncommon procedure, and of the techniques available, labia minora reduction can achieve excellent results. Recently, more conservative labia minora reduction techniques have been developed, because the simple isolated strategy of straight amputation does not ensure a favorable outcome. This study was designed to review a series of labia minora reductions using inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction.
Twenty-one patients underwent inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 46 months. Aesthetic results and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively and evaluated.
Twenty patients (95.2 percent) underwent bilateral procedures, and 90.4 percent of patients had a congenital labia minora hypertrophy. Five complications occurred in 21 patients (23.8 percent). Wound-healing problems were observed more frequently. The cosmetic result was considered to be good or very good in 85.7 percent of patients, and 95.2 percent were very satisfied with the procedure. All complications except one were observed immediately after the procedure.
The results of this study demonstrate that inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction is a simple and consistent technique and deserves a place among the main procedures available. The complications observed were not unexpected and did not extend hospital stay or interfere with the normal postoperative period. The success of the procedure depends on patient selection, careful preoperative planning, and adequate intraoperative management.

Full text

Page 1

COSMETIC
Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction with Inferior
Wedge Resection and Superior Pedicle
Flap Reconstruction
Alexandre Mendonc ¸a
Munhoz, M.D.
Jose ´ Roberto Filassi, M.D.,
Ph.D.
Marcos Deside ´rio Ricci, M.D.
Claudia Aldrighi, M.D.
Leila Domingues Correia,
M.D.
Jose ´ Mendes Aldrighi, M.D.,
Ph.D.
Marcus Castro Ferreira, M.D.,
Ph.D.
Sa ˜o Paulo, Brazil
Background: Aesthetic surgery of female genitalia is an uncommon proce-
dure, and of the techniques available, labia minora reduction can achieve
excellent results. Recently, more conservative labia minora reduction tech-
niques have been developed, because the simple isolated strategy of straight
amputation does not ensure a favorable outcome. This study was designed
to review a series of labia minora reductions using inferior wedge resection
and superior pedicle flap reconstruction.
Methods: Twenty-one patients underwent inferior wedge resection and su-
perior pedicle flap reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 46 months.
Aesthetic results and postoperative outcomes were collected retrospectively
and evaluated.
Results: Twenty patients (95.2 percent) underwent bilateral procedures,
and 90.4 percent of patients had a congenital labia minora hypertrophy. Five
complications occurred in 21 patients (23.8 percent). Wound-healing prob-
lems were observed more frequently. The cosmetic result was considered to
be good or very good in 85.7 percent of patients, and 95.2 percent were very
satisfied with the procedure. All complications except one were observed
immediately after the procedure.
Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that inferior wedge re-
section and superior pedicle flap reconstruction is a simple and consistent
technique and deserves a place among the main procedures available. The
complications observed were not unexpected and did not extend hospital
stay or interfere with the normal postoperative period. The success of the
procedure depends on patient selection, careful preoperative planning, and
adequate intraoperative management.
2006.)
(Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 118: 1237,
A
the main procedures available, labia minora re-
duction can achieve excellent results, and the
new genitalia greatly enhance self-esteem.1–7In
addition to the aesthetic outcome, better local
hygiene, relief of chronic irritations, and lower
interference with sexual intercourse have been
reported as the main additional benefits.4,5,7Re-
cently, increased attention has been focused on
cosmetic results and surgical techniques for labia
esthetic surgery of female genitalia is an
uncommon procedure performed by gy-
necologists and plastic surgeons. Among
minora reduction.1–7Among the main options,
simple protuberant tissue resection is the most
simple and commonly used technique.1,8–13De-
spite the reproducibility of the technique, this
procedure removes the natural contour of the
labia minora and replaces it with an irregular
suture line with an unsatisfactory aesthetic
result.2–7In addition, wide and simple resection
of the protuberant tissue can occasionally ex-
tend to the clitoris and put sexuality at risk.4,7
To avoid these undesirable aesthetic and func-
tional outcomes, since 1998 we have used a sim-
ple and reliable technique based on inferior
wedge labia minora resection and superior pedi-
cle flap reconstruction.7This study was designed
to review a series of labia minora reductions
performed using this technique. The demo-
graphic characteristics of patients, aesthetic re-
sults, and postoperative outcomes regarding flap
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Sa ˜o Paulo
School of Medicine.
Received for publication May 11, 2005; accepted June 30,
2005.
Copyright©2006bytheAmericanSocietyofPlasticSurgeons
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237003.24294.04
www.PRSJournal.com1237

Page 2

and resection area complications were collected
retrospectively and evaluated. These findings are
reported, as well as the main indications, advan-
tages, and limitations of other techniques, pa-
tient satisfaction, and operative planning.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Between May of 1998 and December of 2004,
21 patients underwent aesthetic surgical reduc-
tion of the labia minora at the Hospital das Clı ´ni-
cas, University of Sa ˜o Paulo School of Medicine,
and the senior authors’ (A.M.M. and J.R.F.) pri-
vate practice. Surgical treatment was requested by
the patient, who sought surgical correction for a
better labia minora appearance and functional
problems. The reasons for surgical treatment var-
ied and were as follows: aesthetic complaints, 21
patients (100 percent); interference with sexual
intercourse, 13 (61.9 percent); poor hygiene, 10
(47.6 percent); and difficulty wearing tight-fitting
pants, 7 (33.3 percent) (Table 1). Regarding eti-
ology, 19 patients (90.4 percent) had congenital
labia minora hypertrophy, one patient (4.7 per-
cent) had congenital genital malformation asso-
ciated with vaginal agenesis, and one patient (4.7
percent) had Paget’s disease with a unilateral in-
traepithelial vulvar carcinoma. The technique was
indicated in patients with moderate to large labia
minora hypertrophy with a dimension more than
3 cm measured horizontally from the midline
when placed in lateral traction with minimal ten-
sion.Theaveragefollow-upwas46months(range,
6 to 77 months). All patients were followed closely
in the postoperative period by the gynecologist
and plastic surgeon. Normally, the patients were
followed with physical examination, which was
performed weekly during the first month after
surgery and monthly thereafter.
Flap and resection area complications were
evaluated. The latter included flap necrosis,
wound dehiscence or retraction, infection, and
hematoma. To perform a preoperative and post-
operative comparison, standard anteroposterior
digital color photographs were obtained. An ac-
quired informal questionnaire was used to grade
the patient’s level of satisfaction with the aesthetic
results. The patients classified their level of satis-
faction as very satisfied, satisfied, mixed, disap-
pointed, or regretted their decision. The aesthetic
evaluation was performed by an independent sur-
geonafteraminimumperiodof3monthsandwas
classified as very good or good, satisfactory, or
poor. Data were collected retrospectively from
personal communications, physical examinations,
and charts.
Patient Selection and Flap Design
All patients with moderate and large labia mi-
nora hypertrophy are potential candidates for in-
ferior wedge resection and superior pedicle flap
reconstruction. Preoperatively, with the patient in
the lithotomy position, the genital region is care-
fully examined. This fact is important, because
superior flap reconstruction relies on the redun-
dancy of the skin and mucosa in this region. Pa-
tients with minimal hypertrophy or absence of
skin laxity are not good candidates for the proce-
dure. With a small forceps, the middle portion of
the labia minora is stretched inferiorly until the
posterior part of the vaginal introitus (pinching
test). If skin tension is observed, the forceps is
moved upward; otherwise, if skin laxity is noted,
the forceps is moved downward to resect more
tissue. According to this maneuver, it is possible to
simulate the final aesthetic result and estimate the
amount of tissue necessary to be resected and the
extension of the superior flap. In addition, this
approachprovidesatension-freesuperiorflapclo-
sure. The ideal point grasped by the forceps in the
middle portion of the labia minora is defined as
point A and represents the tip of the flap. The
posterior part of the vagina is defined as point B.
A wedge-shaped area located between the two
points,thelabiaedgeanditsbase,isthendesigned
and represents the area of tissue to be resected.
The angle and extent of the wedge resection vary,
dependingonthetissueexcessandthecutaneous-
mucosal laxity. The superior wedge-shaped flap is
designed on the remaining upper part of the labia
minora between point A (tip) and the clitoral
region (base). This design is based on the dense
network of perforating vessels near the midline in
the perineum. For moderate hypertrophy, the
area to be resected is planned as an isosceles tri-
angle located exclusively on the inferior aspect of
the labia minora. For large hypertrophy, the area
toberesectedcanreachtheanteriorregionofthe
labia minora, and the limits are designed more
obliquely with curved borders. This convex design
allows a large amount of skin and mucosa to be
resected, resulting in a thin superior flap (Figs. 1
and 2).
Table 1. Reasons for Surgical Treatment
Reason
Aesthetic complaints
Interference with sexual intercourse
Poor hygiene
Difficulty wearing tight pants
No. of Patients (%)
21 (100.0)
13 (61.9)
10 (47.6)
7 (33.3)
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • October 2006
1238

Page 3

Fig. 1. Intraoperative views of the basic surgical plan demonstrating the resected area and the superior flap design. With a small
forceps, the middle portion of the labia minora is stretched inferiorly until the posterior part of the vaginal introitus (pinching test)
(above,leftandright,andcenter,left).Thesurgicalmarkingsaredesigned.Theidealpointgraspedbyforcepsinthemiddleportionof
thelabiaminoraisdefinedaspointA,andtheposteriorportionofthevaginaisdefinedaspointB(center,right).Awedge-shapedarea
locatedbetweenthetwopointsisthendesignedandrepresentstheareaoftissuetoberesected.Theangleandextentofthewedge
resection vary, depending on the excess tissue and the cutaneous-mucosal laxity (below, left and right).
Volume 118, Number 5 • Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction
1239

Page 4

Surgical Technique
Withthepatientinthedorsallithotomyposition
and under local anesthesia (1% lidocaine with
1:200,000 epinephrine), the surgical plan is de-
signed in the redundant tissue of the labia minora.
In addition to the benefits of vasoconstriction, local
infiltration increases the virtual subcutaneous space
between lateral and medial skin layers of each la-
biumandfacilitatestissueresectionandinsertionof
skinsutures.Theskinincisioniscarrieddowntothe
subcutaneous tissue on the medial layer of the labia
minora. The complementary incision is performed
onthelaterallayer,andthenthetotalwedge-shaped
areaisresected.Carefulhemostasisofthefinevessels
is performed before closure. Because the flap’s vas-
cular supply derives from the base near the upper
partofthelabiaminora,caremustbetakentoavoid
wide undermining and hemostasis in this region.14
The tip of the flap represented by point A is then
approximated to the inferior point represented by
point B. The medial and lateral incisions are closed
in layers with resorbable sutures. No drains are in-
serted. All patients receive treatment with intrave-
nous antibiotics, and oral administration of antibi-
otics is continued until the third postoperative day.
Thepatientsareinstructedtorest,tomaintaingood
hygiene, to keep the surgical wounds dry, and to
apply antibiotic ointment for approximately 10 days
(Figs. 3 and 4).
RESULTS
Twenty-one patients were treated with inferior
wedge resection and superior pedicle flap recon-
struction for labia minora hypertrophy (Figs. 5
through 7). Mean age of the patients was 38 years
(range, 31 to 49 years). Mean operative time was
Fig. 2. Illustrative views of the surgical plan demonstrating the resected area and the superior flap design. With a small forceps, the
pinchingtestisperformed(above,leftandright).Theidealpointgraspedbyforcepsinthemiddleportionofthelabiaminoraisdefined
aspointA,andtheposteriorportionofthevaginaisdefinedaspointB.Awedge-shapedarealocatedbetweenthetwopointsisthen
designed(below,leftandright).
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • October 2006
1240

Page 5

37 minutes (range, 28 to 55 minutes). Most pa-
tients in our series were discharged on the day of
the operation.
Twenty patients (95.2 percent) underwent bi-
lateral procedures, and only one patient under-
went unilateral resection. In the bilateral group,
Fig.3. Intraoperativeviewsofinferiorwedgelabiaminoraresectionandsuperiorpedicleflapreconstruction.Withthepatientinthe
dorsal lithotomy position, the skin incision is carried down to the subcutaneous tissue on the medial layer of the labia minora. The
complementaryincisionisperformedonthelaterallayer,andthenthetotalwedge-shapedareaisresected(above,leftandright,and
center,left).Thetipoftheflap(pointA)isthenapproximatedtotheinferiorpoint(pointB)(center,right).Themedialandlateralincisions
are closed in layers with resorbable sutures. The same procedure is performed on the opposite side (below, left and right).
Volume 118, Number 5 • Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction
1241

Page 6

14 patients (70 percent) underwent symmetric cu-
taneous-mucosal resection. Because of an asym-
metric deformity in six patients (30 percent), tis-
sue resection required different planning. The
patient with Paget’s disease and unilateral intra-
epithelial vulvar carcinoma underwent partial vul-
vectomy of the affected side and a contralateral
aesthetic inferior wedge resection and superior
pedicle flap reconstruction technique. Mean di-
mensions of the removed specimens were 2.3 cm
(free border) and 2.7 cm (wedge length).
Flap and Resection Area Complication Rates
Fivecomplicationsoccurredin21patients(23.8
percent). All complications except one were ob-
served immediately after the procedure. Distal flap
necrosis was observed in one patient (4.7 percent),
small local hematoma was observed in one patient
(4.7percent),andsuperficialinfectionwasobserved
in one patient (4.7 percent). Wound dehiscence
betweentheflapandtheresectedareawasobserved
in two patients (9.5 percent), with one in the im-
mediate postoperative period (fifth day) and one in
the late postoperative period (1 month). One pa-
tient (4.7 percent) had two complications repre-
sentedbydistalflapnecrosisandwounddehiscence
(Table2).Theonepatientwithinfectionwastreated
with oral antibiotics with satisfactory outcome. No
patient reported sexual dysfunction, late local pain,
orskinretraction,andaestheticalterationofthefree
border of the labia minora was not observed.
Cosmetic Results and Level of Satisfaction
The overall cosmetic result was evaluated at a
minimalperiodof3months(range,3to7months).
The cosmetic result was considered to be good or
very good in 18 patients (85.7 percent) and satisfac-
toryinthreepatients(14.2percent).Nopatienthad
Fig.4. Theskinincisioniscarrieddowntothesubcutaneoustissueonthemediallayer.Thecomplementaryincisionisperformedon
thelaterallayer,andthenthetotalwedge-shapedareaisresected(above,leftandright).PointAisthenapproximatedtopointB(below,
left). The medial and lateral incisions are closed (below, right).
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • October 2006
1242

Page 7

a poor result. The three patients with satisfactory
results had complications represented by distal flap
necrosis and wound dehiscence. In these cases, an
unaesthetic scar, distortion of the remaining labia
minora wedge, and local fibrosis were noted. Five
patients (23.8 percent) with previous labia minora
asymmetry had a small residual cutaneous-mucosal
asymmetry. In this group, the patients were satisfied
withtheaestheticresult,andnosurgicalrevisionwas
indicated. Twenty patients (95.2 percent) were very
satisfied, and one patient (4.7 percent) was satisfied
with the aesthetic appearance of the external geni-
talia. All patients mentioned smaller and finer labia
minora with a more youthful appearance. None of
the patients were disappointed or regretted the op-
eration.
DISCUSSION
Currently, labia minora hypertrophy consti-
tutes a well-recognized physical deformity; how-
ever, there is no consensus about the objective
clinical definition.1–13,15Friedrich11utilized a
length of 5 cm or less calculated horizontally from
the midline. Other investigators have suggested
that normal labia minora length is less than 4 cm
when measured between the base and its free
edge.4,15In our study, combined with the objective
parameterdefinedas3cm,skinlaxityandphysical
symptoms were also taken into consideration. In
addition, individual aesthetic evaluation was also
performed for reduction surgery, and it is our
impression that most patients have their own idea
of what constitutes normal aesthetic appearance.
In the past, external genitalia operations were
usually reserved for patients with ambiguous gen-
italia and adrenogenital syndrome1; however,
more patients are seeking surgical treatment for
aesthetic purposes. One might surmise that this
behavioral alteration can be partly explicated by
Fig.5. Preoperativeviewofa41-year-oldpatientwithseveresymmetricbilaterallabiaminorahypertrophy(above,left).Thesurgical
markings showing planned inferior wedge labia minora resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction, with the superior limit
designed more obliquely and the angle greater than 120 degrees permitting resection of a large amount of tissue (above, right, and
below, left). Immediate postoperative appearance with a very good result (below, right).
Volume 118, Number 5 • Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction
1243

Page 8

the high exposure of female genitals in the pop-
ular media.5In addition, in some cultures, labia
minora enlargement is usually associated with ex-
cessive masturbation or sexual intercourse.4,5
Traditionally, labia minora hypertrophy has
been treated by simple straight amputation of the
excesstissue.1,8–13Despitethesimplicityofthispro-
cedure, by its nature, it often results in a poor
aesthetic outcome and sometimes even sexual
dysfunction.4,7Moreover, with this technique, the
labia minora margin is replaced by a breakable
suture line that is associated with local irritation
and discomfort.2–7
Recently, more conservative labia minora re-
duction techniques have been developed.2–7Inde-
pendently of the technique used, the main prin-
ciple is based on hidden incisions and free labia
minora edge preservation.
Up to now, there has been no consensus con-
cerning the best procedure for labia minora re-
duction. The main advantages of the technique
utilized should include reproducibility, low inter-
ferencewiththephysiologicalfunctions,andlong-
termresults.Probably,thesegoalsarenotattained
by any single procedure, and each technique has
its advantages and limitations depending on the
excess of cutaneous-mucosal tissue, skin laxity,
and the patient’s sexual and athletic activities.
In the present study, the surgical treatment
was always requested by the patient, who sought
surgicalcorrectionforbettergenitalia.Besidesthe
aesthetic complaints, 61.9 percent of patients also
mentioned problems related to sexual inter-
course, and 47.6 percent indicated difficulty in
performingadequatelocalhygiene.Similartoour
findings, Rouzier et al.4observed aesthetic dissat-
Fig. 6. Preoperative view of a 42-year-old patient with moderate symmetric bilateral labia minora hypertrophy (above, left). The
surgical markings showing planned inferior wedge labia minora resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction, with a moderate
reductionandtheanglebetweenthetwolinesofgreaterthan90degrees(above,right,andbelow,left).Latepostoperativeappearance
(18 months) with a very good result (below, right).
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • October 2006
1244

Page 9

isfaction in 87 percent of patients and discomfort
in clothing and taking part in sports in 64 and 26
percent, respectively, as the main reasons for sur-
gical treatment. Contrary to our experience, Maas
andHage3andChoiandKim5observedfunctional
symptoms in all patients, and fewer patients men-
tionedtheaestheticcomplaintsasthemainreason
for surgical treatment.
Preoperative patient evaluation is crucial to
determinetheamountoftissuetoberesectedand
to allow optimal positioning of the incisions to
avoid an ischemic flap. Care must be taken to
make certain that the labia minora enlargement is
not overresected to prevent a tight introitus or
pullingduringsexualintercourse.Whenplanning
the wedge-shaped resection area through the
pinching test, the surgeon should place two or
three fingers inside the introitus and stretch the
labia minora, in this manner estimating the safe
size of tissue resection.
In terms of aesthetic outcome and surgical
morbidity,wedgeresectionwithflapadvancement
has some advantages. Skin texture and color are
similar, the technique is simpler and less aggres-
sive, and the free margin of the labia minora is
always preserved. All these factors are important
Fig. 7. Preoperative view of a 28-year-old patient with moderate symmetric bilateral labia minora hypertrophy (above, left). The
surgical markings showing planned inferior wedge labia minora resection and superior pedicle flap reconstruction, with a small re-
ductionandtheanglebetweenthetwolinesoflessthan90degrees(above,right,andbelow,left).Immediatepostoperativeappearance
with a very good result (below, right).
Table 2. Overall Complication Rates
Complication
Flap*
Skin necrosis
Infection
Wound dehiscence
Resected area*
Infection
Hematoma
Total
*One patient had more than one complication.
No. of Patients (%)
1 (4.7)
1 (4.7)
2 (9.5)
0
1 (4.7)
5 (23.8)
Volume 118, Number 5 • Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction
1245

Page 10

because some patients are young or engage in
sexual activity.
Wedge resection and flap advancement tech-
niques have been previously described.2,4,6Basi-
cally, all techniques use a wedge-shaped resection
located in the upper,2central,6or inferior4part of
thelabiaminora.Inthetechniquewhereupperor
inferior resection is performed, an inferior or su-
perior labia minora flap is advanced into the re-
sected area. In the technique in which central
wedge resection is performed, the remaining su-
perior and inferior margins are directly approxi-
mated by means of single stitches.
Inferior wedge resection and superior pedicle
flap reconstruction is a modification of the orig-
inal technique described by Alter2in 1998 and
modified by Rouzier et al.4in 2000. In Alter’s
original article, he mentioned a wedge-shaped re-
sectionintheinferiorpartofthelabiaminoraand
superiorflapreconstructioninthecaseswherethe
labiaminoraaremoreprotuberantthroughoutits
extension. Correspondingly, Rouzier et al. de-
scribed a “V”-shaped redundant labial tissue re-
section located in the inferior region of the labia
minora. The surgical planning was performed
through rigid marking where the investigators uti-
lized two Kocher clamps. The first clamp was
placed on the posterior part of the labia minora
close to its base, and the second was placed across
the labia minora, together forming an angle of
approximately 90 degrees.
Differently from the technique of Rouzier et al.,
we avoid rigid marking because the tissue redun-
dancyvariesconsiderably.Moreover,combinedwith
the tissue volume, skin laxity can contribute to en-
largement. For moderate hypertrophy, we prefer a
small reduction with an angle between the two lines
of equal to or less than 90 degrees. In the presence
ofseverehypertrophyandifthepatientdesiresmore
aggressive reduction, the angle can be more than
120 degrees. In both situations, a superior flap
is maintained to reconstruct the inferior defect
(Fig. 8).
In our study, most complications with inferior
wedge resection and superior pedicle flap recon-
struction occurred in the early postoperative pe-
riodandwererelatedtowound-healingproblems.
Despite23.8percentofpatientshavingsomecom-
plications, all were minor, predictable, and com-
parable to those in previous clinical trials3,4,6(Ta-
ble 3). These complications did not extend
hospital stay and were treated on an outpatient
basis by conservative methods.
Wound-related problems can be a potential
cause of an unsatisfactory aesthetic result. This
complication was not frequently mentioned in
other clinical series, but it was observed in 14.2
percent of our patients. In these cases, distal flap
necrosis and wound dehiscence resulted in an un-
aesthetic scar, distortion of the remaining labia
minora wedge, and local fibrosis. Therefore, care
must be taken in planning the flap and resection
area because wound tension closure may be in-
volved. Moreover, with the objective of avoiding
additional tissue damage, we refrain from using
Kocher clamps to perform skin incision markings
as proposed by Rouzier et al.4
Cosmetic evaluation was performed after a
minimal postoperative period of 3 months. At this
time, 85.7 percent of patients had good or very
goodaestheticresults,and95.2percentofpatients
were either very satisfied or satisfied with their
result. All patients mentioned smaller and finer
labia minora with a more youthful appearance.
Compared with other reduction techniques
that involve straight amputation of labia minora,
the technique of inferior wedge resection and su-
perior pedicle flap reconstruction has positive as-
pects in terms of aesthetic outcome and safety.
The wedge resection with superior flap advance-
ment leaves no continuous scar at the labial edge
and avoids longitudinal scar contraction once the
final scar runs more obliquely close to the base of
the labia minora. Because no interrupted sutures
areplacedatthefreeedgeofthelabium,thisedge
will turn out more natural.
Despite its main benefits, inferior wedge re-
section with superior pedicle flap reconstruc-
Fig. 8. Illustrative views of the surgical plan demonstrating the
resectedareaandthesuperiorflapdesign.Formoderatehyper-
trophy, we prefer a small reduction with an angle between the
two lines of ?90 degrees (A=–B). In the presence of severe hy-
pertrophy and if the patient desires more aggressive reduction,
the angle can be ?120 degrees (A–B).
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery • October 2006
1246

Page 11

tion has some disadvantages. Because the flap is
not an axial flap, tissue vascularization to the
most distant parts is difficult to predict. This
situation can result in partial necrosis and an
undesirable result. Even though our study dem-
onstrated a very low incidence of flap compli-
cations, care must be taken in high-risk patients
such as smokers and patients with comorbid
associated diseases. Furthermore, care must be
taken to avoid wide undermining and hemosta-
sis near the base of the superior flap because the
vascular supply derives from this region.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study demonstrate that in-
ferior wedge resection with superior pedicle flap
reconstruction is a simple and consistent tech-
nique that has its place among the main proce-
dures available. The complications observed were
expected and did not extend hospital stay and
interfere with the normal postoperative period.
The success of the procedure depends on patient
selection, careful preoperative planning, and ad-
equate intraoperative management.
Alexandre Mendonc ¸a Munhoz, M.D.
Division of Plastic Surgery
University of Sa ˜o Paulo School of Medicine
Rua Oscar Freire 1702 ap 78
05409-011 Sa ˜o Paulo, SP, Brazil
munhozalex@uol.com.br
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Teresa Curi for the English re-
vision and Falcetti for the illustrations.
REFERENCES
1. Hodgkinson, D., and Hait, G. Aesthetic vaginal labioplasty.
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 74: 414, 1983.
2. Alter, G. J. A new technique for aesthetic labia minora re-
duction. Ann. Plast. Surg. 40: 287, 1998.
3. Maas, S., and Hage, J. J. Functional and aesthetic labia mi-
nora reduction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 1453, 1999.
4. Rouzier, R., Sylvestre, C., Paniel, B., and Haddad, B. Hyper-
trophy of labia minora: Experience with 163 reductions. Am.
J. Obstet. Gynecol. 182: 35, 2000.
5. Choi, H., and Kim, K. A new method for aesthetic reduction
of labia minora (the deepithelialized reduction labioplasty).
Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 105: 419, 2000.
6. Giraldo, F., Gonzalez, C., and de Haro, F. Central wedge
nymphectomy with a 90-degree Z-plasty for aesthetic reduc-
tion of the labia minora. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 1820, 2004.
7. Filassi, J. R., Munhoz, A. M., Ricci, M. D., and Melo, N. R.
Aplicac ¸a ˜o do retalho labial superior para correc ¸a ˜o ciru ´rgica
da hipertrofia de pequenos la ´bios. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet.
26: 37, 2004.
8. Radman, H. M. Hypertrophy of the labia minora. Obstet.
Gynecol. 48: 78, 1976.
9. Chavis, W. M., LaFerla, J. J., and Niccolini, R. Plastic repair
of elongated hypertrophic labia minora. J. Reprod. Med. 34:
374, 1989.
10. Caparo, V. J. Congenital anomalies. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 14:
988, 1971.
11. Friedrich, E. G. Vulvar Disease, 2nd Ed. Philadelphia: Saun-
ders, 1983.
12. Sakamoto, H., Ichikawa, G., Shimizu, Y., Kikuchi, A., and
Yamamoto,T.Extremehypertrophyofthelabiaminora.Acta
Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 83: 1225, 2004.
13. Girling, V. R., Salisbury, M., and Ersek, R. A. Vaginal labio-
plasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 115: 1792, 2005.
14. Hwang, W., Chang, T., Sun, P., and Shung, T. Vaginal re-
construction using labia minora flaps in congenital total
absence. Ann. Plast. Surg. 18: 534, 1983.
15. Jeffcoate, N. Hypertrophy of the labia minora: “Spaniel ear
nymphae.” In Principles of Gynecology, 4th Ed. London: But-
terworths, 1975. P. 151.
Table 3. Aesthetic Reduction of Labia Minora: Patients, Follow-Up, Technique, and Main Complications
Study
Hodgkinson and
Hait,11983
Alter,21998
Choi and Kim,5
2000
Rouzier et al.,4
2000
Maas and Hage,3
1999
Giraldo et al.,6
2004
Munhoz et al.,
2006
No. of
Patients
Follow-
Up (mo)
60
Reduction Technique
Straight amputation
Necrosis
0
Infection
0
Wound
Dehiscence
0
Hematoma
03
4
6
*
*
Central wedge resection
Central deepithelialized
reduction labioplasty
Inferior V-shaped
resection
Running W-shaped
resection
90-degree Z-plasty
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16330†011 (7) 60
137200 1 (7.6)1 (7.6)
15 30002 (13.3)6 (40)
2146 Inferior wedge
resection and
superior pedicle flap
reconstruction
1 (4.7)1 (4.7) 2 (9.5)1 (4.7)
*Not specified.
†The complication was mentioned, but the incidence was not specified.
Volume 118, Number 5 • Aesthetic Labia Minora Reduction
1247