Article

Monoamine transporter gene polymorphisms and antidepressant response in Koreans with late-life depression

Department of Psychiatry, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 10/2006; 296(13):1609-18. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.13.1609
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Polymorphisms in the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) may influence antidepressant response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The norepinephrine transporter (NET) is the analogous target for norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (NRIs).
To determine whether antidepressant responses to SSRIs or NRIs are associated with genetic polymorphisms of the corresponding monoamine transporters.
A 6-week naturalistic treatment study with blinded outcome evaluation of 241 Korean inpatients and outpatients with major depression at an academic psychiatry service. Patients were recruited to the study from March 1998 through February 2003.
Treatment with an SSRI (fluoxetine or sertraline; n = 136) or an NRI (nortriptyline; n = 105) antidepressant. Adherence was assessed by measuring plasma concentration at 4 weeks. Patients were genotyped for s/l polymorphisms in 5-HTT promoter region (5-HTTLPR), 5-HTT intron 2 s/l variation, and NET G1287A variation of exon 9.
An SSRI and NRI response (defined as > or =50% decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score at 6 weeks).
NRI response was associated with the NET G1287A polymorphism (odds ratio [OR], 7.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.53-22.49; P<.001). An SSRI response was associated with the 5-HTT intron 2 s/l variation (OR, 20.11; 95% CI, 4.27-94.74; P<.001). The 5-HTTLPR was also associated with an SSRI response (OR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.41-7.91; P = .006). In contrast to studies in white patients, the favorable allele for SSRI response was S 5-HTTLPR. The S 5-HTTLPR was associated also with NRI response (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.32-10.53; P = .01). The NET polymorphism was not associated with an SSRI response. The NET G1287A GG genotype (56% of the population) was associated with better response to the NRI (83.3% [35/42]) than to SSRI (58.7% [44/75]) (OR, 3.52; 95% CI, 1.39-8.95; P = .006). Some genotype combinations were associated with high rates of antidepressant response and others with low rates of response.
Monoamine transporter gene polymorphisms were associated with response to antidepressants with homologous monoamine transporter targets. Combinations of polymorphisms were informative for response and nonresponse. Confirmation of these preliminary findings would permit refined pharmacogenetic selection of antidepressant treatment.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Bernard J Carroll, Sep 30, 2014

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Monoamine transporter gene polymorphisms and antidepressant response in Koreans with late-life depression

184.76 KB

See full-text
1 Follower
 · 
125 Views
  • Source
    • "The T allele of the norepinephrine transporter T-182C polymorphism was associated with a better antidepressant response , whereas the A/A genotype of the norepinephrine transporter G1287A polymorphism was associated with a slower onset of therapeutic response to milnacipran (Yoshida et al., 2004). These finding were supported by another study that found the A/A and G/A genotypes of the norepinephrine transporter G1287A polymorphism were associated with poorer responsiveness to nortriptyline, but not fluoxetine (Kim et al., 2006). Mouse studies have confirmed the role of the norepinephrine transporter, as well as other noradrenergic-related genes, in the behavioral responses to antidepressants. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Major depression is a prevalent and debilitating disorder and a substantial proportion of patients fail to reach remission following standard antidepressant pharmacological treatment. Limited efficacy with currently available antidepressant drugs highlights the need to develop more effective medications for treatment resistant patients and emphasizes the importance of developing better preclinical models that focus on treatment resistant populations. This review discusses methods to adapt and refine rodent behavioral models that are predictive of antidepressant efficacy to identify populations that show reduced responsiveness or are resistant to traditional antidepressants. Methods include separating antidepressant responders from non-responders, administering treatments that render animals resistant to traditional pharmacological treatments, and identifying genetic models that show antidepressant resistance. This review also examines pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments regimes that have been effective in refractory patients and how some of these approaches have been used to validate animal models of treatment-resistant depression. The goals in developing rodent models of treatment- resistant depression are to understand the neurobiological mechanisms involved in antidepressant resistance and to develop valid models to test novel therapies that would be effective in patients that do not respond to traditional monoaminergic antidepressants. Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.
    European Journal of Pharmacology 11/2014; 753. DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.10.063 · 2.68 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "These associations are mechanistically plausible given the rs2242446 polymorphism is located in the NET promoter region and appears to alter transcription (Zill et al., 2002). In addition, the synonymous rs5569 polymorphism in exon 6 has been linked to alternative mRNA splicing and reduced NET functioning (Sogawa et al., 2010), and has been associated with preferential response to noradrenergic antidepressants (Kim et al., 2006). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Predicting differential antidepressant efficacy remains an elusive goal in major depressive disorder (MDD). The aims of this study were three-fold. Firstly, to examine if psychomotor retardation symptoms (item 8 on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) improve preferentially to venlafaxine (VEN) over escitalopram (ESC) treatment. Secondly, whether the 18 item CORE psychomotor signs scale predicted antidepressant remission. Finally, to investigate the role of two norepinephrine transporter gene (NET) polymorphisms (rs2242446 and rs5569) on antidepressant efficacy. Adults with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. MDD (n=113) were treated with ESC or VEN prospectively for 8 weeks and rated serially with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. In a subsample (n=51) of patients from one of the three recruitment sites, the CORE psychomotor signs scale was also administered at baseline. Participants treated with VEN had significantly greater reduction in psychomotor retardation symptoms than those treated with ESC. The CORE scale did not predict antidepressant response or remission. Neither NET polymorphism moderated antidepressant efficacy. Findings suggest possible preferential utility of a selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor in cases of MDD presenting with greater psychomotor retardation. The moderate to small sample size makes a type II error risk possible, and the negative findings need to be interpreted with caution. The positive finding of preferential efficacy of VEN for psychomotor retardation symptoms has potential translational utility.
    International clinical psychopharmacology 03/2013; 28(3). DOI:10.1097/YIC.0b013e32835f1b9f · 3.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "GSK3B is regulated by several neurotransmitter systems, including serotonergic (Li et al., 2004), dopaminergic (Gil et al., 2003), cholinergic and glutamatergic systems (De Sarno et al., 2006). No correlation between the norepinephrine transporter T182C/G1287A polymorphisms and SSRI response was observed (Kim et al., 2006; Min et al., 2009). There are also studies showing evidence for the involvement of the glutamate system on sexual dysfunction, a well-known side effect of SSRI treatment. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most widely prescribed drugs in psychiatry. Based on the fact that SSRIs increase extracellular monoamine levels in the brain, the monoamine hypothesis of depression was introduced, postulating that depression is associated with too low serotonin, dopamine and noradrenaline levels. However, several lines of evidence indicate that this hypothesis is too simplistic and that depression and the efficacy of SSRIs are dependent on neuroplastic changes mediated by changes in gene expression. Because a coherent view on global gene expression is lacking, we aim to provide an overview of the effects of SSRI treatment on the final targets of 5-HT receptor signal transduction pathways, namely the transcriptional regulation of genes. We address gene polymorphisms in humans that affect SSRI efficacy, as well as in vitro studies employing human-derived cells. We also discuss the molecular targets affected by SSRIs in animal models, both in vivo and in vitro. We conclude that serotonin transporter gene variation in humans affects the efficacy and side-effects of SSRIs, whereas SSRIs generally do not affect serotonin transporter gene expression in animals. Instead, SSRIs alter mRNA levels of genes encoding serotonin receptors, components of non-serotonergic neurotransmitter systems, neurotrophic factors, hypothalamic hormones and inflammatory factors. So far little is known about the epigenetic and age-dependent molecular effects of SSRIs, which might give more insights in the working mechanism(s) of SSRIs.
    Pharmacology [?] Therapeutics 08/2012; 136(3). DOI:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.08.015 · 7.75 Impact Factor
Show more