Article

Density functional theory in transition-metal chemistry: A self-consistent Hubbard U approach

Department of Materials Science and Engineering , Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Physical Review Letters (Impact Factor: 7.73). 10/2006; 97(10):103001. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.103001
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Transition-metal centers are the active sites for a broad variety of biological and inorganic chemical reactions. Notwithstanding this central importance, density-functional theory calculations based on generalized-gradient approximations often fail to describe energetics, multiplet structures, reaction barriers, and geometries around the active sites. We suggest here an alternative approach, derived from the Hubbard U correction to solid-state problems, that provides an excellent agreement with correlated-electron quantum chemistry calculations in test cases that range from the ground state of Fe2 and Fe2- to the addition elimination of molecular hydrogen on FeO+. The Hubbard U is determined with a novel self-consistent procedure based on a linear-response approach.

2 Followers
 · 
135 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Gutzwiller projector technique has long been known as a method to include correlations in electronic structure calculations. We describe a model implementation for a Gutzwiller + LDA calculation in a localized-orbital restricted basis framework, emphasizing the protocol step by step and illustrating our specific procedure for this and future applications. We demonstrate the method with a classic problem, the ferromagnetism of bulk bcc Fe, whose nature is attracting fresh interest. In the conventional Stoner-Wohlfarth model, and in spin-polarized LDA calculations, the ferromagnetic ordering of iron sets in so that the electrons can reduce their mutual Coulomb repulsion, at the cost of some increase of electron kinetic energy. This balance may, however, be altered by correlations, which are strong for localized d orbitals. The present localized basis Gutzwiller + LDA calculation demonstrates how the ferromagnetic ordering of Fe may, in fact, entrain a decrease of kinetic energy at the cost of some increase of potential energy. This happens because, as foreshadowed long ago by Goodenough and others and more recently supported by LDA-DMFT calculations, correlations cause e(g) and t(2g) d orbitals to behave differently, with the weakly propagating e(g) states fully spin polarized and almost localized, and only t(2g) states forming a broad partly filled itinerant band. Owing to an intra-atomic Hund's rule exchange that aligns e(g) and t(2g) spins, the propagation of itinerant t(2g) holes is favored when different atomic spins are ferromagnetically aligned. This suggests a strong analogy with double exchange in iron ferromagnetism.
    Physical Review B 09/2014; 90(12). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.125102 · 3.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hydrogen abstraction reactions of the ferryl [FeO] 2+ moiety are investigated theoretically using a simple molecular model (OH)2FeO by DFT methods. Obtained thermochemical and structural data are compared with high-level electron-correlated methods: CCSD(T), BD and MCQDPT2. Two bonding patterns are observed: triple oxo-iron bond Fe +≡O+ and single Fe-O• bond with radical oxygen. Predicted thermochemistry and reactivity with H2 and CH4 molecules for the later one fits well with available experimental data on the N2O + FeZSM5 catalytic system.
    Chemical Physics Letters 01/2015; 622:69-74. DOI:10.1016/j.cplett.2015.01.024 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We successfully proposed a newly corrected density functional theory plus Hubbard U parameter (DFT+U) based on partial core correction on the orbitals within norm-conserving lanthanide atomic pseudopotentials. A related and comprehensive investigation of native point defects in cerium oxides has also been performed as an examine by practice.
    Philosophical Magazine 08/2014; 94(26):3052-3071. DOI:10.1080/14786435.2014.933908 · 1.43 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
6 Downloads
Available from