Article

Hip and non-spine fracture risk reductions differ among antiresorptive agents: Evidence from randomised controlled trials.

Biomedical Research Institute (BIOMED), Hasselt University, Hasselt, Flemish, Belgium
International Journal of Clinical Practice (Impact Factor: 2.54). 12/2006; 60(11):1394-400. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.01148.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A number of antiresorptive agents reduce the risk of vertebral fractures, but few have shown consistent effects on hip and other non-spine fractures. Meta-analysis provides a more precise estimate than individual trials when results are consistent across pooled trials. Earlier meta-analyses summarised the results for vertebral and non-spine fractures. New data have emerged for hormone therapy (HT), alendronate (ALN), risedronate (RIS) and ibandronate (IBN). We surveyed recent reports of randomised, placebo-controlled trials with non-spine and/or hip fracture data, and used meta-analysis where appropriate to test for heterogeneity and derive pooled estimates. The magnitude of effect on hip fracture appears to be similar to that for non-spine fracture for each drug, but differs among drugs. Based on the current data, ALN reduces the risk of hip and non-spine fracture by 49-55%, HT by 25-36% and RIS by 26-27%. There is insufficient and/or inconsistent evidence of an effect on these fractures for IBN, calcitonin and raloxifene.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
95 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose. The aim of this study was to directly compare the efficacy and the safety of the two agents for postmenopausal women. Methods/Principal Findings. Electronic databases were searched for relevant articles that met our predefined inclusion criteria. Seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 4054 women were identified and included. Although Aln was more effective than Rlx in increasing bone mineral density (BMD), no statistical differences were observed in reducing the risk of neither vertebral fractures (P = 0.45) nor nonvertebral fractures (P = 0.87) up to two-year followup. Aln reduced the risk of vasomotor (P = 0.006) but increased the risk of diarrhea compared to Rlx (P = 0.01). Our subgroup analysis further indicated the difference between Aln and Rlx in fracture risk and was not materially altered by the administration pattern, the age. The weekly strategy of Aln would further reduce the upper gastrointestinal (GI) disorders and might gain more bone mass increment at lumbar spine compared to its daily treatment. Conclusion. There was no evidence of difference of fracture risk reduction between Aln and Rlx. In addition, age did not obviously influence their relative antifracture efficacy. For Aln the weekly strategy would further reduce the upper GI disorders and gain more bone mass increment compared to the daily treatment. During clinical decision making, the patients' adherence and the related side-effects associated with both drugs should also be taken into account.
    International Journal of Endocrinology 01/2014; 2014:796510. DOI:10.1155/2014/796510 · 1.52 Impact Factor
  • LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational 07/2011; 25(2). DOI:10.1007/s11639-011-0117-3
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Stroke and Parkinson disease cause disability and immobilization that increase the risk for fractures. The purpose of the present research was to clarify the efficacy of 3 different bisphosphonates against hip fracture in elderly patients with these neurologic diseases. A literature search was performed in Medline, Embase, CBMdisc, and the Cochrane Library until March 1, 2014, with respect to strictly conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a meta-analysis was conducted. Every study was evaluated using the Jadad scale. Eight RCTs met the criteria including 5 RCTs for stroke and 3 for Parkinson disease. According to the results of RCTs, the relative risks (95% confidence interval [CI]) for hip fracture with bisphosphonates treatment compared with control treatment were .20 (.07-.54) for stroke and .26 (.13-.52) for Parkinson disease. Overall, the total relative risk (95% CI) for hip fracture with bisphosphonates treatment was .24 (.14-.42), suggesting hip fracture risks with bisphosphonates treatment were reduced significantly in elderly patients compared with the control group in the 2 neurologic diseases (heterogeneity, .86; P = 1.00 and overall effect, 4.99; P < .0001). Meanwhile, after bisphosphonates treatment, bone mineral density, intact parathyroid hormone, and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D increased, and serum ionized calcium, urinary deoxypyridinoline decreased compared with the placebo group. No severe adverse events were reported for bisphosphonates treatment. The results of a meta-analysis of strictly conducted RCTs suggest that there is efficacy against hip fracture with bisphosphonates treatment in patients with stroke and Parkinson disease.
    Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: the official journal of National Stroke Association 10/2014; 23(10). DOI:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2014.06.022 · 1.99 Impact Factor