Increased Amygdala and Decreased Dorsolateral Prefrontal BOLD Responses in Unipolar Depression: Related and Independent Features

Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Biological Psychiatry (Impact Factor: 10.25). 02/2007; 61(2):198-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.05.048
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Major depressive disorder is characterized by increased and sustained emotional reactivity, which has been linked to sustained amygdala activity. It is also characterized by disruptions in executive control, linked to abnormal dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) function. These mechanisms have been hypothesized to interact in depression. This study explored relationships between amygdala and DLPFC activity during emotional and cognitive information processing in unipolar depression.
Twenty-seven unmedicated patients with DSM-IV unipolar major depressive disorder and 25 never-depressed healthy control subjects completed tasks requiring executive control (digit sorting) and emotional information processing (personal relevance rating of words) during event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) assessment.
Relative to control subjects, depressed subjects displayed sustained amygdala reactivity on the emotional tasks and decreased DLPFC activity on the digit-sorting task. Decreased relationships between the time-series of amygdala and DLPFC activity were observed within tasks in depression, but different depressed individuals showed each type of bias.
Depression is associated with increased limbic activity in response to emotional information processing and decreased DLPFC activity in response to cognitive tasks though these may reflect separate mechanisms. Depressed individuals also display decreased relationships between amygdala and DLPFC activity, potentially signifying decreased functional relationships among these structures.

  • Source
    • "Coping behavior on the SPDB test may also be subject to modulation by the mPFC. Lesioning or pharmacologically reducing activity in the mPFC of rodents decreased burying behavior on the SPDB test (Shah et al. 2004a, b; Siegle et al. 2007). Our lab and others have shown that active coping, i.e., burying the probe following shock, reduced hypothalamicpituitary adrenal axis activation (Bondi et al. 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute low-dose administration of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ketamine, produces rapid and sustained antidepressant-like effects in humans and rodents. Recently, we found that the long-lasting effect of ketamine on the forced swim test requires ventral hippocampal (vHipp) activity at the time of drug administration. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), a target of the vHipp dysregulated in depression, is important for cognitive flexibility and response strategy selection. Deficits in cognitive flexibility, the ability to modify thoughts and behaviors in response to changes in the environment, are associated with depression. We have shown that chronic stress impairs cognitive flexibility on the attentional set-shifting test (AST) and induces a shift from active to passive response strategies on the shock-probe defensive burying test (SPDB). In this study, we tested the effects of ketamine on chronic stress-induced changes in cognitive flexibility and coping behavior on the AST and SPDB, respectively. Subsequently, we investigated vHipp-mPFC plasticity as a potential mechanism of ketamine's therapeutic action. Ketamine reversed deficits in cognitive flexibility and restored active coping behavior in chronically stressed rats. Further, high frequency stimulation in the vHipp replicated ketamine's antidepressant-like effects on the forced swim test and AST, but not on the SPDB. These results show that ketamine restores cognitive flexibility and coping response strategy compromised by stress. Activity in the vHipp-mPFC pathway may represent a neural substrate for some of the antidepressant-like behavioral effects of ketamine, including cognitive flexibility, but other circuits may mediate the effects of ketamine on coping response strategy.
    Psychopharmacology 05/2015; DOI:10.1007/s00213-015-3957-3 · 3.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Elevated medial PFC activity has been observed during self-referential processing in depression (Lemogne et al., 2009), and in response to mood challenge in both subclinical (Farb et al., 2010) and remitted (Farb, Anderson, Bloch, & Segal, 2011) patients. Although decreased DLPFC activity may be a marker for MDD that normalizes with symptom remission (Brody et al., 2001; Siegle et al., 2007; Zhong et al., 2011), the medial PFC continues to display elevated stress reactivity (Lemogne et al., 2010) and resting-state connectivity (Li et al., 2013). Similarly, ADM reduces medial PFC reactivity to negative self-descriptors in individuals at high risk for MDD (Di Simplicio, Norbury, & Harmer, 2012), but medial PFC reactivity to mood challenge persists in medicated, remitted patients , with reactivity in this region predicting future relapse/ recurrence (Farb et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The substantial health burden associated with major depressive disorder (MDD) is a product of both its high prevalence and the significant risk of relapse, recurrence, and chronicity. Establishing recurrence vulnerability factors (VFs) could improve the long-term management of MDD by identifying the need for further intervention in seemingly recovered patients. We present a model of sensitization in depression vulnerability, with an emphasis on the integration of behavioral and neural systems accounts. Evidence suggests that VFs fall into 2 categories: dysphoric attention and dysphoric elaboration. Dysphoric attention is driven by fixation on negative life events, and is characterized behaviorally by reduced executive control, and neurally by elevated activity in the brain's salience network. Dysphoric elaboration is driven by rumination that promotes overgeneral self- and contextual appraisals, and is characterized behaviorally by dysfunctional attitudes, and neurally by elevated connectivity within normally distinct prefrontal brain networks. Although few prospective VF studies exist from which to catalogue a definitive neurobehavioral account, extant data support the value of the proposed 2-factor model. Measuring the continued presence of these 2 VFs during recovery may more accurately identify remitted patients who would benefit from targeted prophylactic intervention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    Journal of Abnormal Psychology 02/2015; 124(1):38-53. DOI:10.1037/abn0000031 · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "INHIBITION IN DEPRESSED ADOLESCENTS (Halari et al., 2009; Koenigs & Grafman, 2009), decreased DLPFC activation during cognitive information processing in depressed adults (Siegle et al., 2007), and increased DLPFC activation with greater symptom remission in depressed adults (Koenigs & Grafman, 2009). The DLPFC is a key node in the executive network of the brain and is posited to be specifically involved in guiding and maintaining attention toward task-relevant goals in the face of interference (Banich, 2009; Miller & Cohen, 2001; Munakata et al., 2011). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Adults diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) have been found to be characterized by selective attention to negative material and by impairments in their ability to disengage from, or inhibit the processing of, negative stimuli. Altered functioning in the frontal executive control network has been posited to underlie these deficits in cognitive functioning. We know little, however, about the neural underpinnings of inhibitory difficulties in depressed adolescents. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging in 18 adolescents diagnosed with MDD and 15 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (CTLs) while they performed a modified affective Go/No-Go task that was designed to measure inhibitory control in the presence of an emotional distractor. Participants were presented with either a happy or a sad face, followed by a go or a no-go target to which they either made or inhibited a motor response. A group (MDD, CTL) by valence (happy, sad) by condition (go, no-go) analysis of variance indicated that MDD adolescents showed attenuated BOLD response in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and in the occipital cortex bilaterally, to no-go targets that followed a sad, but not a happy, face. Adolescents diagnosed with MDD showed anomalous recruitment of prefrontal control regions during inhibition trials, suggesting depression-associated disruption in neural underpinnings of the inhibition of emotional distractors. Given that the DLPFC is associated with the maintenance of goal-relevant information, it is likely that sad faces differentially capture attention in adolescents with MDD and interfere with task demands requiring inhibition.
    Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 01/2015; DOI:10.1080/15374416.2014.982281 · 1.92 Impact Factor
Show more