Auditing outcomes and costs of integrated complementary medicine provision--the importance of length of follow up.

Centre for Complementary Healthcare & Integrated Medicine (CCHIM), Faculty of Health & Human Sciences, Thames Valley University, Walpole House, 4th Floor, 18-22 Bond Street, Ealing, London W5 5AA, UK.
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 11/2006; 12(4):249-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2006.07.007
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A retrospective audit was carried out on 58 patients with chronic health problems who were referred by 22 general practitioners (GPs) for acupuncture, aromatherapy, homeopathy, massage and osteopathy, or a combination. Costs of GP consultations, prescriptions, secondary care referrals, and diagnostic tests from records of 33 of these patients were compared pre (24 months), during (mean 4.3 months) and post (mean 5.7 months) complementary medicine (CM) treatment. Patient centred outcome data included the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) and content analysis of patient and practitioner comments. Costs of GP consultations/patient/month were significantly higher during (20.10 pounds, p<0.001) and post (17.53 pounds, p<0.01) CM treatment compared with pre-treatment costs (11.27 pounds). Total prescription costs were not significantly higher during and post-treatment than pre-treatment. Prescription costs for referred conditions were lower during (2.26 pounds) and higher post-treatment (3.75 pounds) compared with costs pre-treatment (3.24 pounds). Pre- and post-treatment MYMOP scores indicated significant improvements in health and well-being. Longer follow up, is required in order to demonstrate significant cost savings related to CM provision. Cost comparisons with conventional medicine should consider quantitative and qualitative data to capture the wider benefits experienced by patients.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integrative oncology focuses on the roles of complementary therapies to increase the effectiveness of conventional cancer treatment programs by improving defined outcomes such as symptom control, quality of life, rehabilitation, and prevention of recurrence. Implementation of integrative oncology programs should be based on the best evidence and must continually be evaluated to ensure quality, optimization of techniques, collection of new data, and cost-effectiveness. Useful domains that can be evaluated include symptom control, adherence to treatment protocols, quality of life, individual outcomes, prevention, rehabilitation, potential advantages of a whole-systems health approach, and economics of health services.
    Current Oncology 09/2008; 15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):s78-82. DOI:10.3747/co.v15i0.271
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Integrative medicine (blending the best of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) with conventional medicine) is becoming increasingly popular. The objectives of this paper are to compare and contrast the development of two teams that set out to establish integrative medical clinics, highlighting key issues found to be common to both settings, and to identify factors that appear to be necessary for integration to occur. At St Michael's Hospital (an inner-city teaching hospital in Toronto, Canada), a total of 42 interviews were conducted between February 2004 and August 2006 wi18 key participants (4 administrators, 2 chiropractors, 2 physiotherapists and 10 family physicians). At the CARE (Complementary and Alternative Research and Education) Program at Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Canada, 44 interviews were conducted with 24 people on four occasions: June 2004, March 2005, November 2006, and June 2007. Basic content analysis was used to identify the key themes from the transcribed interviews. Despite the contextual differences between the two programs, a striking number of similar themes emerged from the data. The five most important shared themes were: 1) the necessity of "champions" and institutional facilitators to conceive of, advocate for, and bring the programs to fruition; 2) the credibility of these champions and facilitators (and the credibility of the program being established) was key to the acceptance and growth of the program in each setting; 3) the ability to find the "right" practitioners and staff to establish the integrative team was crucial to each program's ultimate success; 4) the importance of trust (both the trustworthiness of the developing program as well as the trust that developed between the practitioners in the integrative team); and 5) the challenge of finding physical space to house the programs. The programs were ultimately successful because of the credibility of the champions, institutional facilitators and the staff members. Selection of excellent clinicians who were able to work well as a team facilitated the establishment of trust both within the team itself as well as between the team and the host institution.
    BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 02/2008; 8:32. DOI:10.1186/1472-6882-8-32
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives To understand the following about patients using an acupuncture teaching clinic: 1) Sociodemographic characteristics and main complaints. 2) Self-reported level of patient-centered outcomes regarding pain management. Methods/Design: Retrospective chart review. Subjects 458 new patients at NESA clinic during October 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010. Interventions A variety of styles of Oriental medicine: primarily Chinese and Japanese style acupuncture, and also heat treatments (MOXA or heat lamps) and Tui Na (Asia bodywork). Results Results from Objective 1 were descriptive (n=421). Objective 2 focused on the 59 patients from the larger sample who completed both an initial and a follow-up Measure Your Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) form and who used acupuncture for pain management of 1) diseases of the musculoskeletal system and/or connective tissue or 2) migraine/headache. Both the symptom severity and activity of daily living/well-being scales of the MYMOP showed over 15.8% improvement from baseline to at least 6 weeks of treatment: 28.6% for Symptom 1, 19.4% for Symptom 2, 35.7% for activities of daily living, and 25.0% for wellbeing. The relative majority for each sociodemographic trait investigated were as follows: female, about 40 years old, white, not Hispanic or Latino, married, highly educated, and employed, respectively. Most patients were confident in acupuncture treatment. Out of the 421 acupuncture patients, 68.2% wanted acupuncture in order to manage pain. 20.6% patients (59, N=287) completed 6th week follow-up MYMOP who used acupuncture for pain management for diseases of the musculoskeletal system and/or connective tissue, or migraine or headache. Of these, 57.6% (34, N=59) patients returned for 6 acupuncture treatments, and reported clinical improvement in at least one MYMOP severity score and no score got worse. Conclusions The information about sociodemographic characteristic and patient-centered outcomes of pain management can be used for service provision, future study planning, and marketing. Future studies should address the low follow-up rate, the quality of self-reported clinic data, and the reasons that patients chose acupuncture treatments and teaching clinics.
    EXPLORE The Journal of Science and Healing 09/2014; 10(5). DOI:10.1016/j.explore.2014.06.004