Norfloxacin vs Ceftriaxone in the Prophylaxis of Infections in Patients With Advanced Cirrhosis and Hemorrhage

IMDM and IDIBAPS, Liver Unit, Hospital Clínic, University of Barcelona, Villaroel 170, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Gastroenterology (Impact Factor: 16.72). 10/2006; 131(4):1049-56; quiz 1285. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.07.010
Source: PubMed


Oral norfloxacin is the standard of therapy in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage. However, during the last years, the epidemiology of bacterial infections in cirrhosis has changed, with a higher incidence of infections caused by quinolone-resistant bacteria. This randomized controlled trial was aimed to compare oral norfloxacin vs intravenous ceftriaxone in the prophylaxis of bacterial infection in cirrhotic patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.
One hundred eleven patients with advanced cirrhosis (at least 2 of the following: ascites, severe malnutrition, encephalopathy, or bilirubin >3 mg/dL) and gastrointestinal hemorrhage were randomly treated with oral norfloxacin (400 mg twice daily; n = 57) or intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g/day; n = 54) for 7 days. The end point of the trial was the prevention of bacterial infections within 10 days after inclusion.
Clinical data were comparable between groups. The probability of developing proved or possible infections, proved infections, and spontaneous bacteremia or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis was significantly higher in patients receiving norfloxacin (33% vs 11%, P = .003; 26% vs 11%, P = .03; and 12% vs 2%, P = .03, respectively). The type of antibiotic used (norfloxacin), transfusion requirements at inclusion, and failure to control bleeding were independent predictors of infection. Seven gram-negative bacilli were isolated in the norfloxacin group, and 6 were quinolone resistant. Non-enterococcal streptococci were only isolated in the norfloxacin group. No difference in hospital mortality was observed between groups.
Intravenous ceftriaxone is more effective than oral norfloxacin in the prophylaxis of bacterial infections in patients with advanced cirrhosis and hemorrhage.

Download full-text


Available from: Ramon Planas,
  • Source
    • "These bacterial infections are present in 35% to 66% of liver cirrhosis patients with variceal bleeding, and is a risk factor for early rebleeding.20 Prophylactic antibiotics can increase the survival rate;21 therefore, the administration of antibiotics in patients with variceal bleeding is essential and is performed as soon as the patient arrives at the hospital.22 Norfloxacin selectively works against the gram-negative bacteria of the gastrointestinal tract and is orally administered at a dose of 400 mg, twice daily, for 1 week.23 When oral administration of antibiotics are impossible, quinolones such as ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin may be administered intravenously. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acute variceal bleeding could be a fatal complication in patients with liver cirrhosis. In patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis accompanied by ascites or hepatic encephalopathy, acute variceal bleeding is associated with a high mortality rate. Therefore, timely endoscopic hemostasis and prevention of relapse of bleeding are most important. The treatment goals for acute variceal bleeding are to correct hypovolemia; achieve rapid hemostasis; and prevent early rebleeding, complications related to bleeding, and deterioration of liver function. If variceal bleeding is suspected, treatment with vasopressors and antibiotics should be initiated immediately on arrival to the hospital. Furthermore, to obtain hemodynamic stability, the hemoglobin level should be maintained at >8 g/dL, systolic blood pressure >90 to 100 mm Hg, heart rate <100/min, and the central venous pressure from 1 to 5 mm Hg. When the patient becomes hemodynamically stable, hemostasis should be achieved by performing endoscopy as soon as possible. For esophageal variceal bleeding, endoscopic variceal ligation is usually performed, and for gastric variceal bleeding, endoscopic variceal obturation is performed primarily. If it is considered difficult to achieve hemostasis through endoscopy, salvage therapy may be carried out while keeping the patient hemodynamically stable.
    Clinical Endoscopy 07/2014; 47(4):308-14. DOI:10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.308
  • Source
    • "First, administration of intravenous antibiotics is theoretically more appropriate than those administered orally in the prophylaxis of infection in patients with active UGIB. Second, it was reported that intravenous ceftriaxone is more effective than fluoroquinolone in areas of a high prevalence of quinolone-resistant organisms [13]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The influential roles of antibiotic prophylaxis on cirrhotic patients with peptic ulcer bleeding are still not well documented. The purpose of this study is to clarify these influential roles and to identify the risk factors associated with rebleeding, bacterial infection and in-hospital mortality. A cross-sectional, chart review study was conducted on 210 cirrhotic patients with acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage who underwent therapeutic endoscopic procedures. Patients were divided into group A (with prophylactic intravenous ceftriaxone, n = 74) and group B (without antibiotics, n = 136). The outcomes were length of hospital days, prevention of infection, rebleeding rate and in-hospital mortality. Our results showed that more patients suffered from rebleeding and infection in group B than group A (31.6% vs. 5.4%; p<0.001 and 25% vs. 10.8%; p = 0.014 respectively). The risk factors for rebleeding were active alcoholism, unit of blood transfusion, Rockall score, model for end-stage liver disease score and antibiotic prophylaxis. The risk factors for infection were active alcoholism, Child-Pugh C, Rockall score and antibiotic prophylaxis. Rockall score was the predictive factor for in-hospital mortality. In conclusions, antibiotic prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients after endoscopic interventions for acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage reduced infections and rebleeding rate but not in-hospital mortality. Rockall score was the predictive factor of in-hospital mortality.
    PLoS ONE 05/2014; 9(5):e96394. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0096394 · 3.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Development of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage are the most direct consequence of portal hypertension.1 When variceal bleeding is suspected, patients should be hemodynamically stabilized, vasopressors, antibiotic2,3 and endoscopic therapy4 can be performed to control the hemorrhage. However, when medical or endoscopic control of bleeding was not achievable, surgical procedures are needed.5 "
    Sen Liu ·
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To evaluate the clinical outcome of emergency and elective operation of splenectomy with periesophagogastric devascularization in treating upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resulted from portal hypertension. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 219 patients of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage resulted from portal hypertension treated using emergency or elective operation between Jul 2002 and Aug 2010. The clinical data were collected and analyzed. Results: In the group of elective operation, four patients with grade B and three with grade C died, and in the group of emergency operation, two patients with Grade B and four with Grade C died. The Grade C patients treated using emergency operation presented with a higher mortality than those treated using elective operation, but no significant difference was found (p>0.05). In the two groups, no patients with Grade A died. 17 cases (11.1%) suffered from complications in the group of elective operation and 11 cases (16.7 %) in emergency operation (p>0.05). The complication rate in patients with Grade C is significantly higher than that in patients with Grade A or B in each group (p<0.05). The hospital stay and cost in group of elective operation are significantly higher than those in group of emergency operation (p<0.05). Conclusion: The patients with Grade A or B treated using emergency operation have similar clinical outcomes as those treated using elective operation, but emergency operation may result in higher rate of death and complication in patients with Grade C.
    Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Online 05/2014; 30(3):574-7. DOI:10.12669/pjms.303.4520 · 0.23 Impact Factor
Show more