Psychiatric Symptoms and Community Violence Among High-Risk Patients: A Test of the Relationship at the Weekly Level

Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 11/2006; 74(5):967-79. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.967
Source: PubMed


Given the availability of violence risk assessment tools, clinicians are now better able to identify high-risk patients. Once these patients have been identified, clinicians must monitor risk state and intervene when necessary to prevent harm. Clinical practice is dominated by the assumption that increases in psychiatric symptoms elevate risk of imminent violence. This intensive study of patients (N = 132) at high risk for community violence is the first to evaluate prospectively the temporal relation between symptoms and violence. Symptoms were assessed with the Brief Symptom Inventory and threat/control override (TCO) scales. Results indicate that a high-risk patient with increased anger in 1 week is significantly more likely to be involved in serious violence in the following week. This was not true of other symptom constellations (anxiety, depression, TCO) or general psychological distress. The authors found no evidence that increases in the latter symptoms during 1 week provide an independent foundation for expecting violence during the following week.

Download full-text


Available from: Edward Patrick Mulvey, Sep 30, 2015
35 Reads
    • ") is a 53-item measure of psychological symptoms experienced during the past week that includes specific symptom scales and a global severity index (GSI). Following Skeem et al. (2006), we report only on the GSI ( .96) and four subscales: anxiety (6 items; . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are a number of prominent trait-based models and assessments of psychopathy that posit the existence of a varying number of central traits, which differ in their relation to one another and the degree to which they manifest similar empirical networks. In the current study (N = 347), we examined Lilienfeld's popular 3-factor model and measure (Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Short Form; Kastner, Sellbom, & Lilienfeld, 2012; Lilienfeld & Andrews, 1996) in relation to adverse developmental factors, self and informant ratings of general personality and "near neighbor" personality styles from the Dark Triad (e.g., narcissism), as well as internalizing symptoms and externalizing behaviors. The 3 factors-Fearless Dominance, Self-centered Impulsivity, and Coldheartedness-manifested relatively limited relations with one another (median r = .22) and demonstrated varying empirical networks such that Self-centered Impulsivity was associated with substantial maladaptivity, Fearless Dominance was associated with a mixture of adaptive and maladaptive correlates, and Coldheartedness' relations to the external criteria fell in between and manifested a relatively small number of significant correlations. There was little evidence that the psychopathy factors in general, and Fearless Dominance more specifically, interacted with one another in the prediction of externalizing behaviors or interacted with adverse developmental/parental experiences to predict these behaviors. These results are relevant to ongoing discussions regarding the manner in which psychopathy is conceptualized and assessed. (PsycINFO Database Record
    Psychological Assessment 09/2015; DOI:10.1037/pas0000221 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Anger dysregulation is part of a broad range of clinical disorders (DiGiuseppe & Tafrate, 2007; Novaco, 2010), and its relevance for clinical and forensic populations centrally concerns it being a dynamic risk factor for violence. Studies with multiple control variables show anger to be related to the violent behavior of psychiatric patients before, during, and after hospitalization (Doyle & Dolan, 2006a, 2006b; McNiel, Eisner, & Binder, 2003; Monahan et al., 2001; Novaco & Taylor, 2004; Skeem et al., 2006; Swogger et al., 2012) and to physical aggression within institutions by incarcerated adults (Wang & Diamond, 1999). Anger is not only an important clinical need, it also bears on the therapeutic milieu and on the well-being of clinical and custodial staff. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anger has high prevalence in clinical and forensic settings, and it is associated with aggressive behavior and ward atmosphere on psychiatric units. Dysregulated anger is a clinical problem in Danish mental health care systems, but no anger assessment instruments have been validated in Danish. Because the Novaco Anger Scale and Provocation Inventory (NAS-PI) has been extensively validated with different clinical populations and lends itself to clinical case formulation, it was selected for translation and evaluation in the present multistudy project. Psychometric properties of the NAS-PI were investigated with samples of 477 nonclinical, 250 clinical, 167 male prisoner, and 64 male forensic participants. Anger prevalence and its relationship with other anger measures, anxiety/depression, and aggression were examined. NAS-PI was found to have high reliability, concurrent validity, and discriminant validity, and its scores discriminated the samples. High scores in the offender group demonstrated the feasibility of obtaining self-report assessments of anger with this population. Retrospective and prospective validity of the NAS were tested with the forensic patient sample regarding physically aggressive behavior in hospital. Regression analyses showed that higher scores on NAS increase the risk of having acted aggressively in the past and of acting aggressively in the future. © The Author(s) 2015.
    Assessment 05/2015; DOI:10.1177/1073191115583713 · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, anger is also a " fundamental and functional human emotion " that is a robust dynamic risk factor for violence among both general offenders and psychiatric inpatients (Gardner, Lidz, Mulvey, & Shaw, 1996; Novaco, 1994; Novaco, 2011a, p. 661a; Novaco, 2011b). In an intensive study of 132 psychiatric patients at high risk for community violence, Skeem et al. (2006) found that anger robustly predicted violence, unlike symptoms that were more unique to serious mental illness (e.g., delusions). In short, approaching anger as a symptom of mental illness runs the risk of pathologizing a normal emotional state (Novaco, 2011a). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although offenders with mental illness are overrepresented in the criminal justice system, psychiatric symptoms relate weakly to criminal behavior at the group level. In this study of 143 offenders with mental illness, we use data from intensive interviews and record reviews to examine how often and how consistently symptoms lead directly to criminal behavior. First, crimes rarely were directly motivated by symptoms, particularly when the definition of symptoms excluded externalizing features that are not unique to Axis I illness. Specifically, of the 429 crimes coded, 4% related directly to psychosis, 3% related directly to depression, and 10% related directly to bipolar disorder (including impulsivity). Second, within offenders, crimes varied in the degree to which they were directly motivated by symptoms. These findings suggest that programs will be most effective in reducing recidivism if they expand beyond psychiatric symptoms to address strong variable risk factors for crime like antisocial traits. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Law and Human Behavior 04/2014; 38(5). DOI:10.1037/lhb0000075 · 2.16 Impact Factor
Show more