Article

Cognitive processing therapy for veterans with military-related posttraumatic stress disorder

Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (Impact Factor: 4.85). 11/2006; 74(5):898-907. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.5.898
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Sixty veterans (54 men, 6 women) with chronic military-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) participated in a wait-list controlled trial of cognitive processing therapy (CPT). The overall dropout rate was 16.6% (20% from CPT, 13% from waiting list). Random regression analyses of the intention-to-treat sample revealed significant improvements in PTSD and comorbid symptoms in the CPT condition compared with the wait-list condition. Forty percent of the intention-to-treat sample receiving CPT did not meet criteria for a PTSD diagnosis, and 50% had a reliable change in their PTSD symptoms at posttreatment assessment. There was no relationship between PTSD disability status and outcomes. This trial provides some of the most encouraging results of PTSD treatment for veterans with chronic PTSD and supports increased use of cognitive- behavioral treatments in this population.

1 Bookmark
 · 
253 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Experiencing systematic violence and trauma increases the risk of poor mental health outcomes; few interventions for these types of exposures have been evaluated in low resource contexts. The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the effectiveness of two psychotherapeutic interventions, Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression (BATD) and Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), in reducing depression symptoms using a locally adapted and validated version of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist and dysfunction measured with a locally developed scale. Secondary outcomes included posttraumatic stress, anxiety, and traumatic grief symptoms.Methods Twenty community mental health workers, working in rural health clinics, were randomly assigned to training in one of the two interventions. The community mental health workers conducted baseline assessments, enrolled survivors of systematic violence based on severity of depression symptoms, and randomly assigned them to treatment or waitlist-control. Blinded community mental health workers conducted post-intervention assessments on average five months later.ResultsAdult survivors of systematic violence were screened (N¿=¿732) with 281 enrolled in the trial; 215 randomized to an intervention (114 to BATD; 101 to CPT) and 66 to waitlist-control (33 to BATD; 33 to CPT). Nearly 70% (n¿=¿149) of the intervention participants completed treatment and post-intervention assessments; 53 (80%) waitlist-controls completed post-intervention assessments. Estimated effect sizes for depression and dysfunction were 0.60 and 0.55 respectively, comparing BATD participants to all controls and 0.84 and 0.79 respectively, compared to BATD controls only. Estimated effect sizes for depression and dysfunction were 0.70 and 0.90 respectively comparing CPT participants to all controls and 0.44 and 0.63 respectively compared to CPT controls only. Using a permutation-based hypothesis test that is robust to the model assumptions implicit in regression models, BATD had significant effects on depression (p¿=¿.003) and dysfunction (p¿=¿.007), while CPT had a significant effect on dysfunction only (p¿=¿.004).Conclusions Both interventions showed moderate to strong effects on most outcomes. This study demonstrates effectiveness of these interventions in low resource environments by mental health workers with limited prior experience.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00925262. Registered June 3, 2009.
    BMC Psychiatry 12/2014; 14(1):1693. DOI:10.1186/s12888-014-0360-2 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who fail to respond to established treatments are at risk for chronic disability and distress. Although treatment-resistant PTSD (TR-PTSD) is a common clinical problem, there is currently no standard method for evaluating previous treatment outcomes. Development of a tool that could quantify the degree of resistance to previously provided treatments would inform research in patients with PTSD. We conducted a systematic review of PTSD treatment trials to identify medication and psychotherapy interventions proven to be efficacious for PTSD. We then developed a semi-structured clinician interview called the Emory Treatment Resistance Interview for PTSD (E-TRIP). The E-TRIP includes clinician-administered questions to assess the adequacy and benefit derived from past treatment trials. For each adequately delivered treatment to which the patient failed to respond, a score is assigned depending on the strength of evidence supporting the treatment's efficacy. The E-TRIP provides a comprehensive assessment of prior PTSD treatments that should prove valuable for researchers studying TR-PTSD and evaluating the efficacy of new treatments for patients with PTSD. The E-TRIP is not intended to guide treatment; rather, the tool quantifies the level of treatment resistance in patients with PTSD in order to standardize TR-PTSD in the research domain.
    12/2014; 4(4):511-527. DOI:10.3390/bs4040511
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite extensive data from randomized controlled trials supporting the efficacy of evidence-based treatments (EBTs), the adoption of these interventions in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Department of Defense has been markedly slow. Qualitative interviews were conducted with a nationally representative sample of 38 directors of specialized posttraumatic stress disorder outpatient programs in VA medical centers about implementation of two EBTs. Every director confirmed that EBTs, specifically prolonged exposure and cognitive processing therapy, were provided in their program. It was nearly universal, however, for these treatments to be preceded by preparatory groups. The consensus among directors was that these groups improve readiness for trauma-focused EBTs, help veterans to make informed decisions about their treatment plans, improve coping skills and symptom management, and decrease the likelihood of no-shows for scheduled EBTs. The concept of readiness for trauma-focused EBTs guided program development
    Professional Psychology Research and Practice 01/2015; DOI:10.1037/a0038535 · 1.34 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
252 Downloads
Available from
Oct 27, 2014