Article

Polypharmacy and prescribing quality in older people

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 11/2006; 54(10):1516-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00889.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To evaluate the relationship between inappropriate prescribing, medication underuse, and the total number of medications used by patients.
Cross-sectional study.
Veterans Affairs Medical Center.
One hundred ninety-six outpatients aged 65 and older who were taking five or more medications.
Inappropriate prescribing was assessed using a combination of the Beers drugs-to-avoid criteria (2003 update) and subscales of the Medication Appropriateness Index that assess whether a drug is ineffective, not indicated, or unnecessary duplication of therapy. Underuse was assessed using the Assessment of Underutilization of Medications instrument. All vitamins and minerals, topical and herbal medications, and medications taken as needed were excluded from the analyses.
Mean age was 74.6, and patients used a mean+/-standard deviation of 8.1+/-2.5 medications (range 5-17). Use of one or more inappropriate medications was documented in 128 patients (65%), including 73 (37%) taking a medication in violation of the Beers drugs-to-avoid criteria and 112 (57%) taking a medication that was ineffective, not indicated, or duplicative. Medication underuse was observed in 125 patients (64%). Together, inappropriate use and underuse were simultaneously present in 82 patients (42%), whereas 25 (13%) had neither inappropriate use nor underuse. When assessed by the total number of medications taken, the frequency of inappropriate medication use rose sharply from a mean of 0.4 inappropriate medications in patients taking five to six drugs, to 1.1 inappropriate medications in patients taking seven to nine drugs, to 1.9 inappropriate medications in patients taking 10 or more drugs (P<.001). In contrast, the frequency of underuse averaged 1.0 underused medications per patient and did not vary with the total number of medications taken (P=.26). Overall, patients using fewer than eight medications were more likely to be missing a potentially beneficial drug than to be taking a medication considered inappropriate.
Inappropriate medication use and underuse were common in older people taking five or more medications, with both simultaneously present in more than 40% of patients. Inappropriate medication use is most frequent in patients taking many medications, but underuse is also common and merits attention regardless of the total number of medications taken.

0 Followers
 · 
121 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Given a great number of elderly people using medications, the main objective of the analysis was to determine the prevalence of prescribing inappropriate medications to the elderly in 2006. Potentially inappropriate medications were identified on the basis of the Beers 2002 and the Laroche 2007 criteria and according to the combined criteria of inappropriate prescribing. Methods: We analysed the anonymous database of dispensed outpatient medications prescribed in 2006 provided by The Health Insurance Institute of Slovenia. Beers's 2002 criteria were used for the elderly people aged 65 or more and the Laroche 2007 and the combined criteria for the age group of 75 years and over. Results: According to the Beers 2002 criteria, 22.41 per cent of the elderly patients were prescribed at least one inappropriate medical ingredient; by the Laroche 2007 criteria, the percentage of older people receiving inappropriate drugs was 25.72 and by the combined criteria 35.95. Judging by the published data, these shares are rather high. The prevalence of inappropriately prescribed medications (with respect to all prescriptions) was 3.43 per cent by the Beers 2002 criteria, 4.01 per cent, according to the Laroche 2007 criteria and 6.03 per cent according to the combined criteria. These shares are higher than in Croatia mainly because of the greater quantity of inappropriate medications used in Slovenia. Further it was discovered, that the probability of being prescribed an inappropriate medication increases along with the number of prescribed medications. Discussion: Despite the established high prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions, there is no unanimity in the literature concerning the influence of inappropriate prescribing on the health of older people. We would emphasise here that the criteria discussed are intended to help rather than convince physicians to choose the appropriate therapy. They are also meant to be used in pharmacoepidemiological studies. Ways to reduce the rate of inappropriate medication prescribing are put forward.
    01/2011; 50(1). DOI:10.2478/v10152-010-0026-5
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Scientific evidence on treatments of chronic diseases in patients 85 years old or older is very limited, as is available information on inappropriate prescription (IP) and its associated factors. The study aimed to describe medicine prescription, potentially inappropriate medicines (PIM) and potentially prescribing omissions (PPO) and their associated factors on this population. In the context of an observational, prospective and multicentric study carried out in elderly patients admitted to seven Spanish hospitals for a year, a sub-analysis of those aged 85 years and over was performed. To assess PIMs, the Beers and STOPP criteria were used, and to assess PPOs, the START and the ACOVE-3 criteria were used. To assess factors associated with IP, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Patients were selected randomly every week on consecutive days from the hospitalization lists. A total of 336 patients were included in the sub-analysis with a median (Q1-Q3) age of 88 (86-90) years. The median medicines taken during the month prior to admission was 10 (7-13). Forty-seven point two per cent of patients had at least one Beers-listed PIM, 63.3% at least one STOPP-listed PIM, 53.6% at least one START-listed PPO, and 59.4% at least one ACOVE-3-listed PPO. Use of benzodiazepines in patients who are prone to falls (18.3%) and omission of calcium and vitamin D supplements in patients with osteoporosis (13.3%) were the most common PIM and PPO, respectively. The main factor associated with the Beers-listed and the STOPP-listed PIM was consumption of 10 or more medicines (OR = 5.7, 95% CI 1.8-17.9 and OR = 13.4, 95% CI 4.0-44.0, respectively). The main factors associated with the START-listed PPO was a non-community dwelling origin (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.0-5.0), and multimorbidity (OR1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.1). Prescribed medicines and PIM and PPO prevalence were high among patients 85 years and over. Benzodiazepine use in those who are prone to falls and omission of calcium and vitamin D in those with osteoporosis were the most frequent PIM and PPO, respectively. Factors associated with PIM and PPO differed with polypharmacy being the most important factor associated with PIM.
    BMC Geriatrics 04/2015; 15(1):42. DOI:10.1186/s12877-015-0038-8 · 2.00 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Elderly people are the principal consumers of prescription drugs. The more the medication used by the patient, the greater the likelihood there is of the patient being subjected to potentially inappropriate drug therapy (PIDT). PIDT has been measured in the literature with both implicit and explicit tools. The purpose of this review was to assess the use of tools to detect PIDT in various studies and to determine which terms are used to refer to PIDT in practice. A systematic review was conducted according to the following steps: the first was identification. In this step, studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors 'aged', 'elderly', 'inappropriate prescribing' and 'drug utilization' in three different languages, using the Embase, Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Second, the papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria for data extraction were carefully examined by three evaluators to determine the tools used and terms that referred to PIDT. From the combinations of keywords, 8610 articles were found. At the end of the selection process, 119 of the articles complied with the specified criteria. The degree of agreement among evaluators was moderate for the study titles (κ1 = 0·479) and substantial for abstracts (κ2 = 0·647). With respect to the PIDT evaluation criteria used by the studies, 27·7% used two criteria. Of the 27 evaluation criteria identified, the Beers criteria were used by 82·3% of the studies. More than 50 different terms to identify PIDT were found in the literature. This review is the first study to conceptualize and discuss terms that refer to PIDT. At present, there is no consensus regarding terms used to refer to PIDT, with over 50 different terms currently in use. This review shows an increase in the number of articles aimed at evaluating PIDT using implicit and explicit tools. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 02/2015; DOI:10.1111/jcpt.12246 · 1.53 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
6 Downloads
Available from
Feb 20, 2015