Effects of testosterone and corticosterone on immunocompetence in the zebra finch.

Centre for Ecology and Conservation, School of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9EZ, UK.
Hormones and Behavior (Impact Factor: 3.74). 02/2007; 51(1):126-34. DOI:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2006.09.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The original immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (ICHH) suggested that testosterone has a handicapping effect in males by both promoting the development of sexual signals and suppressing immune function. A modified version, the stress-linked ICHH, has recently proposed that testosterone is immunosuppressive indirectly by increasing production of corticosterone. To test both the original and stress-mediated versions of the ICHH, we implanted male zebra finches taken from lines selected for divergent maximum stress-induced levels of corticosterone (high, low and control) with either empty or testosterone-filled implants. Their humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were then assessed by challenge with diphtheria:tetanus vaccine and phytohemagglutinin respectively. We found no effect of the hormone manipulations on either PHA or tetanus antibody responses, but found a significant interaction between titers of both testosterone and corticosterone on diphtheria secondary antibody response; antibody response was greatest in individuals with high levels of both hormones. There was also a significant interactive effect between testosterone treatment group and corticosterone titer on body mass; the body mass of males in the elevated testosterone treatment group decreased with increasing corticosterone titer. These results suggest that, contrary to the assumption of the stress-mediated version of the ICHH, high plasma levels of corticosterone are not immunosuppressive, but are in fact immuno-enhancing in the presence of high levels of plasma testosterone. Equally, the central assumption of the ICHH that testosterone is obligately immunosuppressive is also not supported. The same individuals with the highest levels of both hormones and consequently the most robust antibody response also possessed the lowest body mass.

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A challenge to ecologists and evolutionary biologists is predicting organismal responses to the anticipated changes to global ecosystems through climate change. Most evidence suggests that short-term global change may involve increasing occurrences of extreme events, therefore the immediate response of individuals will be determined by physiological capacities and life-history adaptations to cope with extreme environmental conditions. Here, we consider the role of hormones and maternal effects in determining the persistence of species in altered environments. Hormones, specifically steroids, are critical for patterning the behaviour and morphology of parents and their offspring. Hence, steroids have a pervasive influence on multiple aspects of the offspring phenotype over its lifespan. Stress hormones, e.g. glucocorticoids, modulate and perturb phenotypes both early in development and later into adulthood. Females exposed to abiotic stressors during reproduction may alter the phenotypes by manipulation of hormones to the embryos. Thus, hormone-mediated maternal effects, which generate phenotypic plasticity, may be one avenue for coping with global change. Variation in exposure to hormones during development influences both the propensity to disperse, which alters metapopulation dynamics, and population dynamics, by affecting either recruitment to the population or subsequent life-history characteristics of the offspring. We suggest that hormones may be an informative index to the potential for populations to adapt to changing environments.
    Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 06/2012; 367(1596):1647-64. · 6.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Handicap models link the evolution of secondary sexual ornaments to physiological costs and thus provide a mechanistic explanation for signal honesty in sexual selection. Two commonly invoked models, the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (ICHH) and the oxidative stress handicap hypothesis (OSHH), propose suppression of immunocompetence or increase of oxidative stress by testosterone, but empirical evidence for both models is controversial and based on morphological and physiological assays. Here, we investigated these two models on the gene transcription level using microarrays to quantify the transcriptomic response of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scoticus) caecal, spleen and liver tissues to experimental manipulation of testosterone levels. We used a geneontology framework to identify genes related to immune function and response to reactive oxygen species and examined how transcription levels changed under experimentally increased testosterone levels in birds with parasites present or absent. Contrary to our expectations, testosterone had virtually no effect on gene transcription in spleen and liver. A small number of genes were significantly differentially regulated in caecum, and while their functions and transcription changes are consistent with the ICHH, we found little support for the OSHH. More genes responded to testosterone in the presence rather than absence of parasites, suggesting that handicap mechanisms may be context dependent and more pronounced in the presence of adverse environmental conditions. These findings illustrate the utility of transcriptomics to investigating handicap models, suggest that classic models may not underlie the handicap mechanism, and indicate that novel emerging models involving different mediators and physiological systems should be examined.
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 01/2013; 67(2). · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Songbirds have emerged as attractive model systems in many areas of biological research. Notably, songbirds are used in studies of the neurobiological and neuroendocrine mechanisms that shape vocal communication, and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) are the most commonly studied species. In these studies, some form of chemical restraint is often needed to facilitate procedures and to minimize the risk of injury during handling. To determine the minimum dose of the benzodiazepine diazepam that is adequate to achieve deep sedation across individual birds, a low dose (5 mg/kg) and a high dose (10 mg/kg) was administered intramuscularly to 20 zebra finches. Results showed that a 10 mg/kg dose of diazepam resulted in deep sedation, defined by dorsal recumbency, which was achieved in minutes and lasted for several hours. Sedation was induced without complication, because no birds displayed signs of distress during sedation or lethargy after recovery, and was adequate to permit minimally invasive surgical procedures. In addition, the duration of sedation was dose dependent, which provides additional information for researchers who seek to match the depth of sedation to their experimental requirements. Finally, complete recovery from the deeply sedated state was induced by a 0.3 mg/kg dose of the antagonist flumazenil, which enabled birds to more rapidly resume homeostatic behaviors to promote well-being and survival. Together, these results indicate that diazepam is a safe and reliable sedative for use in zebra finches and support specific recommendations to achieve rapid and reliable sedation and recovery.
    Journal of Avian Medicine and Surgery 06/2012; 26(2):76-84. · 0.52 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Sep 20, 2013