Nutritional support for head-injured patients

London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Nutrition & Public Health Intervention Research Unit, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online) (Impact Factor: 5.94). 02/2006; DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001530.pub2
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Head injury increases the body's metabolic responses, and therefore nutritional demands. Provision of an adequate supply of nutrients is associated with improved outcome. The best route for administering nutrition (parenterally (TPN) or enterally (EN)), and the best timing of administration (for example, early versus late) of nutrients needs to be established.
To quantify the effect on mortality and morbidity of alternative strategies of providing nutritional support following head injury.
Trials were identified by computerised searches of the Cochrane Injuries Group specialised register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, National Research Register, Web of Science and other electronic trials registers. Reference lists of trials and review articles were checked. The searches were last updated in July 2006.
Randomised controlled trials of timing or route of nutritional support following acute traumatic brain injury.
Two authors independently abstracted data and assessed trial quality. Information was collected on death, disability, and incidence of infection. If trial quality was unclear, or if there were missing outcome data, trialists were contacted in an attempt to get further information.
A total of 11 trials were included. Seven trials addressed the timing of support (early versus delayed), data on mortality were obtained for all seven trials (284 participants). The relative risk (RR) for death with early nutritional support was 0.67 (95% CI 0.41 to 1.07). Data on disability were available for three trials. The RR for death or disability at the end of follow-up was 0.75 (95% CI 0.50 to 1.11). Seven trials compared parenteral versus enteral nutrition. Because early support often involves parenteral nutrition, three of the trials are also included in the previous analyses. Five trials (207 participants) reported mortality. The RR for mortality at the end of follow-up period was 0.66 (0.41 to 1.07). Two trials provided data on death and disability. The RR was 0.69 (95% Cl 0.40 to 1.19). One trial compared gastric versus jejunal enteral nutrition, there were no deaths and the RR was not estimable.
This review suggests that early feeding may be associated with a trend towards better outcomes in terms of survival and disability. Further trials are required. These trials should report not only nutritional outcomes but also the effect on death and disability.

Download full-text


Available from: Pablo Perel, Jan 14, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the most severe injuries encountered in intensive care units. TBI patients exhibit protein wasting and gastrointestinal dysfunction, which may be risk factors for a septic state. Specific nutritional support may be required for these patients, and we hypothesize that standard nutritional support does not allow restoration of the nutritional state of TBI patients. A well-validated rat model of TBI by fluid percussion was used. Rats were randomized into three groups: healthy rats receiving standard chow diet ad libitum (AL), rats sustaining TBI and receiving standard chow diet (TBI), and rats sustaining TBI and receiving a standard enteral diet (TBI-EN) for 4 days. TBI in rats was characterized by anorexia, body weight loss (AL: +15 +/- 5 g versus TBI: -11 +/- 4 g and TBI-EN: -8 +/- 4 g; p < 0.05), decrease in nitrogen balance (AL: 2.9 +/- 0.2 g versus TBI: 1.0 +/- 0.2 g and TBI-EN: 0.2 +/- 0.2 g, p < 0.05) associated with decrease in muscular protein content (extensor digitorum longus [EDL]: AL: 36 +/- 2 mg versus TBI: 26 +/- 3 mg and TBI-EN: 28 +/- 2 mg; p < 0.05), and intestinal atrophy (ileum: AL: 673 +/- 42 mg versus TBI: 442 +/- 23 mg and TBI-EN: 377 +/- 27 mg; p < 0.05). Interestingly, standard enteral nutrition was not effective in restoring any of these parameters. This work confirms that TBI is associated with profound nutritional alterations and has a major impact on nitrogen metabolism and on intestinal trophicity. It also demonstrates that using standard enteral nutrition cannot reverse this phenomenon. Thus, developing new nutritional strategies to cover TBI patients' specific nutritional requirements appears mandatory.
    Journal of neurotrauma 11/2009; 26(11):1911-20. DOI:10.1089/neu.2008.0737 · 3.97 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction The delivery of adequate nutrition is an integral part of the care of the critically ill surgical patient, and the provision of nutrition may have a greater impact on outcome than many other therapies commonly employed in the treatment of certain disease states. Methods A review of the existing literature was performed to summarize the evidence for utilizing disease-specific nutrition in critically ill surgical patients. Results Enteral nutrition, unless specifically contraindicated, is always preferable to parenteral nutrition. Methodological heterogeneity and conflicting results plague research in immunonutrition, and routine use is not currently recommended in critically ill patients. Conclusion There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the routine initial use of most disease-specific formulas, as most patients with the disease in question will tolerate standard enteral formulas. However, the clinician should closely monitor for signs of intolerance and utilize disease-specific formulas when appropriate.
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery 06/2013; 39(3). DOI:10.1007/s00068-013-0264-8 · 0.38 Impact Factor