Article

Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis.

Institute for Surgical Research, Ludwig Maximilian University, Munich, Germany.
Child s Nervous System (Impact Factor: 1.16). 03/2007; 23(2):201-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00381-006-0209-1
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We designed several distraction devices and applied these instruments in 14 patients with varying types of craniosynostosis. The aim of this report is to clarify the advantages and disadvantages of these surgical methods and to discuss current concepts for the surgical strategy in the treatment of craniosynostosis.
From January 2000 to July 2005, 28 patients with craniosynostosis were retrospectively analyzed. Surgical treatment was performed on 14 patients using the distraction method with internal distraction devices that we designed, in which 5 patients had plagiocephaly, 3 brachycephaly, and 6 scaphocephaly. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative evaluations, which included the patient's neurological state, and three-dimensional CT.
With distraction devices, the time required for the surgery could be shortened almost 3 1/3 h; the bleeding during the surgery was decreased with reduced requirement of more than 200 ml of blood transfusion as compared with remodeling surgery. Postoperatively achieved distraction distances varied from 30.0 to 47.5 mm (mean, 42.99 mm). The average increased volume percent of cranium in distraction surgery group was 20.9% (range, -11.5 to 58.9%) after full distraction.
With distraction surgery, satisfactory cranial volume expansion and aesthetically pleasing morphological states were achieved in all cases, and the efficacy was statistically significantly high as compared with remodeling method.

0 Followers
 · 
109 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Non-syndromic coronal synostoses oxycephaly and brachycephaly (NSCSOB) are rare. Their natural history, surgical management, and outcome are debated. We reviewed the available literature on NSCSOB. In addition, we reviewed retrospectively our experience with cases of NSCSOB, managed and operated by our joint craniofacial team since 1984. Newborns underwent perifrontal craniectomy, while infants and older children underwent fronto-orbital advancement with frontoparietal remodeling. Cases with delayed onset of faciosynostosis were excluded. Some cases of NSCSOB present at birth or even prenatally with gross dysmorphism and severe brachycephaly; others present later in life with harmonious restriction of intracranial volume and are at risk for development and vision. Some NSCSOB evolve from initially unisutural synostoses. We treated 61 cases, operated aged 1.4 to 106.7 months, 30 with brachycephaly and 31 with oxycephaly. Twelve of these (19.7 %), had been treated initially for sagittal or unicoronal synostosis, and evolved into NSCSOB. Intracranial hypertension was present initially in 28 (45.9 %), with ophthalmological consequences in 13 (21.3 %) and mental retardation in 6 (9.6 %). No patient had hydrocephalus; only two had asymptomatic Chiari malformation. The mean postoperative follow-up was 113.6 months. At last control, 21 patients had developmental delay and 5 had visual impairment. NSCSOB are a complex entity. They have in common a high risk of severe intracranial hypertension and rare hydrodynamic complications. Genetic screening is necessary to assert their non-syndromic nature. Prolonged follow-up of all craniosynostoses is necessary because unisutural synostoses can evolve into NSCSOB, and NSCSOB can evolve into craniofaciosynostosis.
    Child s Nervous System 09/2012; 28(9):1439-46. DOI:10.1007/s00381-012-1800-2 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article, we review some of the traditional techniques used to treat craniosynostosis. In addition to sharing our current approach to treating craniosynostosis with open techniques, we discuss our opinions on the evolving roles of newer modalities such as spring-assisted cranioplasty and cranial vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis.
    The Journal of craniofacial surgery 01/2012; 23(1):229-34. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241b93a · 0.68 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Posterior vault expansion using distraction osteogenesis has become a vital instrument in our institution, particularly as a first-line treatment in syndromic craniosynostosis. In this review, we highlight the several advantages, diverse utility, and technicalities of the operative procedure. Methods A review of the literature and explanation of the technical details of the procedures were described in this manuscript. Results/conclusion Posterior cranial vault distraction offers several benefits over traditional expansion procedures.
    Child s Nervous System 09/2012; 28(9). DOI:10.1007/s00381-012-1802-0 · 1.16 Impact Factor