Effectiveness of community physiotherapy and enhanced pharmacy review for knee pain in people aged over 55 presenting to primary care: pragmatic randomised trial
ABSTRACT To evaluate the effectiveness of two primary care strategies for delivering evidence based care to people aged 55 or over with knee pain: enhanced pharmacy review and community physiotherapy.
Pragmatic multicentre randomised clinical trial.
15 general practices in North Staffordshire.
325 adults aged 55 years or over (mean 68 years) consulting with knee pain; 297 (91%) reached six month follow-up.
Enhanced pharmacy review (pharmacological management in accordance with an algorithm); community physiotherapy (advice about activity and pacing and an individualised exercise programme); control (advice leaflet reinforced by telephone call).
Change in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Mean baseline WOMAC pain score was 9.1 (SD 3.7), and mean baseline function score was 29.9 (SD 12.8). At three months, the mean reductions in pain scores were 0.41 (SD 2.8) for control, 1.59 (3.2) for pharmacy, and 1.56 (3.4) for physiotherapy; reductions in function scores were 0.80 (8.5), 2.61 (9.8), and 4.79 (10.8). Compared with control, mean differences in change scores for physiotherapy were 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.2 to 2.1) for pain and 3.99 (1.2 to 6.8) for function; those for pharmacy were 1.18 (0.3 to 2.1) for pain and 1.80 (-0.8 to 4.5) for function. These differences were not sustained to six or 12 months. Significantly fewer participants in the physiotherapy group reported consulting their general practitioner for knee pain in the follow-up period, and use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was lower in the physiotherapy and pharmacy groups than in the control group.
Evidence based care for older adults with knee pain, delivered by primary care physiotherapists and pharmacists, resulted in short term improvements in health outcomes, reduced use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and high patient satisfaction. Physiotherapy seemed to produce a shift in consultation behaviour away from the traditional general practitioner led model of care.
UK National Research Register N0286046917; Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN55376150 [controlled-trials.com] .
Full-textDOI: · Available from: George M Peat, Jun 18, 2015
- SourceAvailable from: Marcelo Colucci[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To assess the impact of daily cane use during gait in relation to pain, function, general health and energy expenditure among patients with knee osteoarthritis. Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned to an experimental group (EG) or control group (CG). The EG used a cane every day for 2 months, whereas the CG did not use a cane in this period. The first outcome was pain and the second were function (Lequesne and WOMAC), general health (SF-36) and energy expenditure (gas analysis during the 6-minute walk test (6MWT) with and without a cane). Evaluations were performed at baseline, 30 and 60 days. The groups were homogeneous for all parameters at baseline. Compared with the CG, the EG significantly improved pain (ES 0.18), function - Lequesne (ES 0.13), some domains of SF-36 (role physical, ES 0.07 and bodily pain, ES 0.08) and distance on the 6MWT with the cane (ES 0.16). At the end of the 6MWT with the cane, the EG significantly improved energy expenditure (ES 0.21), carbon dioxide production (ES 0.12) and metabolic equivalents (ES 0.15) compared with the CG. A cane can be used to diminish pain, improve function and some aspects of quality of life in patients with knee osteoarthritis. The prescription of a cane should take into account the substantial increase in energy expenditure in the first month of use, whereas energy expenditure is no longer a factor for concern by the end of the second month due to adaptation to cane use. The trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00698412).Annals of the rheumatic diseases 11/2011; 71(2):172-9. DOI:10.1136/ard.2010.140178 · 9.27 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To investigate improvement in various impairments by exercise interventions in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). We collected data on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of exercise intervention with those of either nonintervention or psychoeducational intervention in patients with knee OA. Data on pain, stiffness, muscle strength, range of motion, flexibility, maximal oxygen uptake, and position sense were synthesized. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to determine the quality of the evidence. Thirty-three RCTs involving 3,192 participants were identified. Meta-analysis provided highquality evidence that exercise intervention improves maximal oxygen uptake, and moderate-quality evidence that exercise intervention also improves pain, stiffness, knee extensor and flexor muscle strength, and position sense. The evidence that exercise intervention improves knee extension and flexion range of motion was deemed as undetermined-quality. In patients with knee OA, improvement in pain, stiffness, muscle strength, maximal oxygen uptake, and position sense with the use of exercise intervention can be expected. Although the quality of evidence of the effect of exercise intervention on range of motion was inconclusive, exercise intervention should be recommended for patients with knee OA to improve various impairments.Journal of the Japanese Physical Therapy Association 01/2013; 16(1):7-21. DOI:10.1298/jjpta.Vol16_003
- British Journal of General Practice 07/2014; 64(624):372-4. DOI:10.3399/bjgp14X680749 · 2.36 Impact Factor