Special issues for building computerized-adaptive tests for measuring patient-reported outcomes: the National Institute of Health's investment in new technology.

National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-7344, USA.
Medical Care (Impact Factor: 2.94). 12/2006; 44(11 Suppl 3):S198-204. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000245146.77104.50
Source: PubMed
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the feasibility of computer adaptive testing (CAT), using an internet or telephonic interface, to collect patient-reported outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation and to examine patient characteristics associated with completion of the CAT-administered measure, and with mode of administration. Prospective cohort study of patients contacted approximately 4 weeks after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Patients selected an internet or telephonic interface. Inpatient rehabilitation hospital. Patients (N=674) with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, or medically complex conditions. None. CAT version of the Community Participation Indicators (CAT-CPI). From an eligible pool of 3221 patients, 674 (21%) agreed to complete the CAT-CPI. Patients who agreed to complete the CAT-CPI were younger and reported slightly higher satisfaction with overall care than did those who did not participate. Among these patients, 231 (34%) actually completed the CAT-CPI; 141 (61%) selected telephonic administration and 90 (39%) selected internet administration. Decreased odds of completing the CAT-CPI were associated with black and "other" race; stroke, brain injury, orthopedic, and "other" impairments; and being a Medicaid beneficiary, whereas increased odds of completing the CAT-CPI were associated with longer length of stay and higher discharge Functional Independence Measure (FIM) cognition measure. Decreased odds of choosing internet administration were associated with younger age, retirement status, and female gender, whereas increased odds of choosing internet administration were associated with higher discharge FIM motor measure. CAT administration by internet and telephone has limited feasibility for collecting post-rehabilitation outcomes for the majority of rehabilitation patients, but is feasible for a subset of patients. Providing alternative ways of answering questions helps assure that a larger proportion of patients will respond.
    Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 01/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.024 · 2.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To develop and calibrate the activities of daily living item bank (ADLib-cardio) as a prerequisite for a Computer-adaptive test (CAT) for the assessment of ADL in patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD). After pre-testing for relevance and comprehension a pool of 181 ADL items were answered on a five-point Likert scale by 720 CVD patients, who were recruited in fourteen German cardiac rehabilitation centers. To verify that the relationship between the items is due to one factor, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted. A Mokken analysis was computed to examine the double monotonicity (i.e. every item generates an equivalent order of person traits, and every person generates an equivalent order of item difficulties). Finally, a Rasch analysis based on the partial credit model was conducted to test for unidimensionality and to calibrate the item bank. Results of CFA and Mokken analysis confirmed a one factor structure and double monotonicity. In Rasch analysis, merging response categories and removing items with misfit, differential item functioning or local response dependency reduced the ADLib-cardio to 33 items. The ADLib-cardio fitted to the Rasch model with a nonsignificant item-trait interaction (chi-square=105.42, df=99; p=0.31). Person-separation reliability was 0.81 and unidimensionality could be verified. The ADLib-cardio is the first calibrated, unidimensional item bank that allows for the assessment of ADL in rehabilitation patients with CVD. As such, it provides the basis for the development of a CAT for the assessment of ADL in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Calibrating the ADLib-cardio in other than rehabilitation cardiovascular patient settings would further increase its generalizability.
    Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 08/2013; 11(1):133. DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-11-133 · 2.10 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of health-related quality of life has a long history in the field of oncology treatment and research. We present a brief history of how the concept has evolved in oncology and the sentinel events in that process. We then focus on advances in measurement science as applied to health-related quality of life measures and argue that a compelling new set of measurement tools is now available, including brief, generic measures with good psychometric qualities (exemplified by the new PROMIS measures and the possibility of a common metric spanning all diseases). The last section of the paper turns to emerging opportunities for these measures, including in clinical trials, healthcare reform, and regulatory deliberations. Our conclusion is that health-related quality of life is more important today than it has ever been, and that the time has come for an even wider adoption of the new measures. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).
    American Psychologist 02/2015; 70(2):175-185. DOI:10.1037/a0037821 · 6.87 Impact Factor